Advertise on podcast: AgNet News Hour

The February 3 edition of the AgNet News Hour wrapped up a powerful three-part interview series with Rick Roberti, President of the California Cattlemen’s Association, as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill explored what lies ahead for California agriculture — and why complacency could be its greatest threat. The conversation blended hard truths about politics, land use, and regulation with a clear call to action for farmers, ranchers, and ag supporters statewide. Roberti explained that cattle production remains one of the least automated and most hands-on segments of agriculture. Raising beef is a three-year investment, from breeding to harvest, requiring constant care, daily labor, and long-term financial risk. “You don’t just flip a switch,” Roberti said. “Every animal represents years of work before it ever reaches a plate.” Despite record-high cattle prices driven by strong consumer demand, Roberti warned that profitability is still fragile. Rising costs, regulatory pressure, predator losses, and uncertainty around water and land access continue to strain producers. He pointed out that California cattle numbers are historically low, and rebuilding herds takes years — not months — making policy mistakes especially dangerous right now. A major theme of the episode was land conversion. Roberti said thousands of acres of productive farmland are lost every year to housing and development, and once land is paved over, it never comes back. In many rangeland areas, cattle are the only viable use of the land. Remove livestock, he warned, and those landscapes either become unmanaged fire hazards or targets for urban sprawl. Politics also took center stage. Roberti acknowledged frustration within agriculture but urged producers not to disengage. “Giving up guarantees you lose,” he said. He believes progress is still possible by working with moderate lawmakers who are beginning to recognize that California’s current approach isn’t working. Local government, he emphasized, is where agriculture can make the biggest difference — from city councils to county boards of supervisors. Roberti encouraged farmers and ranchers to tell their story directly. He shared an example where public understanding shifted dramatically once officials explained the realities of wolf depredation and livestock losses. “Most people don’t hate agriculture,” he said. “They just don’t understand it — because no one has explained it to them.” The episode also featured updates on World Ag Expo, with Papagni and McGill reminding listeners that innovation remains one of agriculture’s strongest tools. Precision technology, smarter agronomy, and efficient equipment are helping growers stretch inputs and stay competitive, even as regulatory pressure increases. As the series concluded, Roberti struck an optimistic tone. California, he said, still has unmatched climate, soil, and production capacity. What’s missing is leadership with vision and common sense. “This state isn’t lost,” he said. “But agriculture has to stand up for itself — or someone else will decide its future.” Papagni summed it up plainly: “As long as people eat, farming matters. And California farmers deserve a fair shot.”

The February 2 edition of the AgNet News Hour continued the powerful, multi-part conversation with Rick Roberti, President of the California Cattlemen’s Association, as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill dug deeper into what ranchers are really facing on the ground. From unchecked predators to workforce uncertainty and food security, Roberti warned that California is drifting dangerously far from common sense — and the consequences are already showing. Roberti explained that California’s wolf problem has moved well beyond theory and into daily reality. In regions like Sierra Valley, ranchers documented more than 100 livestock kills in just a few months, despite constant monitoring and intervention by state and federal agencies. Wolves in California, he said, have never been pressured or deterred, making them fearless around cattle and people. “They don’t know what consequences are,” Roberti said. “They’ve never had any.” State agencies attempted extensive non-lethal methods, including round-the-clock wardens, night-vision surveillance, and even USDA drone teams. None of it stopped the killings. Roberti said the idea that ranchers can solve the problem with guard dogs or range riders ignores reality. “If drones and helicopters couldn’t stop them, how is a guy on horseback supposed to?” he asked. The impact goes far beyond livestock losses. Ranchers are now pulling cattle out of mountain grazing areas entirely, making it impossible to sustain operations that have relied on that land for generations. That decision ripples outward — reducing county revenue, increasing wildfire risk due to unmanaged vegetation, and weakening already-fragile rural economies. Roberti tied the wolf crisis into a broader pattern of policy failure. He said California continues to lose farmland to development while importing more food than it exports — a shift he called alarming. “A nation that can’t feed itself isn’t free,” he said, warning that the U.S. is edging closer to that reality. Another major concern is succession. Roberti said fewer young people are willing to take over ranches that require seven-day-a-week commitment with constant regulatory pressure and financial risk. When families sell, land is often purchased by investors with no long-term connection to agriculture. “They’ll still run cows,” he said, “but it’s not the same when it’s not your life.” Water management and forest policy also entered the discussion. Roberti argued that decades of mismanagement — including halting logging and controlled burns — have contributed to catastrophic wildfires and habitat loss, which in turn pushes predators closer to livestock and communities. “This isn’t climate change,” he said. “This is fuel buildup and bad decisions.” Despite the challenges, Roberti stressed that cattle producers are not asking to eliminate wolves or abandon environmental responsibility. They want balance — and the right to protect their livelihoods. “Give us the ability to defend our property,” he said. “The wolves will learn fast.” Papagni and McGill closed the episode by emphasizing that the cattle industry’s struggle reflects a larger disconnect between policymakers and rural California. As Roberti put it, “You can’t manage agriculture from a desk and expect it to work in the real world.”

The January 30 edition of the AgNet News Hour delivered one of the most graphic and hard-hitting conversations yet on California’s escalating wolf crisis, as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill continued their in-depth interview with Rick Roberti, President of the California Cattlemen’s Association. This first installment of a three-part series pulled back the curtain on what ranchers are facing in real time — and why many believe state policy has gone dangerously off the rails. Roberti explained that California’s wolf population did not organically re-establish itself, but instead migrated from Yellowstone wolves introduced decades ago. Once a single wolf crossed into California roughly a dozen years ago, the state quickly listed wolves under its own Endangered Species Act, creating some of the strictest predator protections in the country. That decision, Roberti said, left ranchers defenseless. Under California law, ranchers are prohibited from hazing, deterring, or defending against wolves — even when livestock are actively being attacked. “You couldn’t even chase them off,” Roberti said. “That’s hard for people to believe, but it’s true.” As packs expanded, wolves adapted quickly, losing their fear of humans and learning that cattle herds offered easy prey. Roberti described in disturbing detail how wolves kill livestock — often not to eat, but for sport. Unlike mountain lions, which kill quickly and return to their prey, wolves maim animals over long periods, leaving calves and cows paralyzed and suffering before consuming only select portions. In open valleys like Sierra Valley, ranchers have been able to document the damage firsthand, revealing daily losses that would otherwise go unnoticed in rough terrain. The situation is compounded by declining wildlife populations. With deer and elk numbers collapsing due to unchecked predators like mountain lions and bears, wolves have shifted closer to human communities. Roberti said wolves are now being spotted near homes and ranch yards, creating safety concerns far beyond livestock losses. Beyond wolves, Roberti highlighted the broader pressure facing the cattle industry. U.S. cattle numbers are at their lowest level since 1951, and rebuilding a herd takes years — not months. While producers have improved meat quality and efficiency, challenges like labor costs, regulation, border issues, and threats such as the New World screwworm continue to strain operations. Despite the grim realities, Roberti emphasized that California cattle producers still have unique advantages, including year-round grass growth and fall calving that produces premium-timed animals for the market. But he warned that without policy changes, those advantages won’t be enough. Papagni and McGill stressed that this issue goes beyond cattle — it reflects a growing disconnect between decision-makers and the realities of rural life. As Roberti put it, “You can’t manage wildlife from a desk in Sacramento and expect it to work on the ground.” This episode served as a stark reminder that California agriculture isn’t asking for special treatment — just the ability to survive.

The January 29 edition of the AgNet News Hour delivered one of the most wide-ranging and passionate interviews of the year as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill sat down with Dayna Ghirardelli, Executive Director of the Sonoma County Farm Bureau. From animal-rights extremism to water insecurity, vineyard market shifts, and the rising cost of simply staying in business, Ghirardelli laid out why farming in Sonoma County has become a daily fight — and why giving up is not an option. Ghirardelli opened by acknowledging the beauty of Sonoma County, while making it clear that agriculture there faces relentless pressure. Wine grapes remain under market strain, the Potter Valley Project threatens regional water reliability, and animal-rights activists continue to target dairies and poultry operations despite strong local voter support for agriculture. “It’s another day in agriculture in Sonoma County,” she said. “And it never slows down.” A major focus of the conversation was Measure J, a ballot initiative backed by animal-rights groups that aimed to ban so-called “factory farms” in the county. Ghirardelli explained that the measure deliberately misused the EPA’s CAFO definition, which is meant to regulate water quality — not eliminate animal agriculture. Had it passed, she said, the fallout would have devastated poultry, dairy, and the many businesses that support them. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the measure, stopping what she called an attempt to turn Sonoma County into a statewide test case for eliminating animal agriculture altogether. The interview also addressed the recent conviction of Zoe Rosenberg, an activist tied to the Measure J campaign who was found guilty of felony conspiracy and multiple misdemeanors after trespassing, tampering with vehicles, and stealing livestock. While Ghirardelli welcomed accountability, she expressed frustration that the sentence amounted to just ten days in jail. “It sends a dangerous message,” she said, warning that weak penalties embolden extremists who view arrest as a badge of honor. Water and environmental policy were another major theme. While Sonoma County hasn’t faced the wolf pressure seen in other regions, Ghirardelli noted that predator issues, NGOs, and environmental lawsuits are increasingly being used as tools to financially bleed farmers dry. “They don’t need to win,” she said. “They just need to make it expensive enough to keep farming.” Education, she emphasized, is agriculture’s strongest defense. Ghirardelli said the industry has done a good job marketing, but not nearly enough educating. Programs like Ag Days, Farm Fest, and school outreach events are critical to reconnecting the public with where food actually comes from — especially in a state where many residents believe it comes straight from a grocery shelf. Looking ahead to 2026, Ghirardelli called the moment urgent. Rising costs, regulatory overload, housing challenges, and political polarization are pushing California toward a breaking point. “People need to stop voting by party and start voting by reality,” she said. “Quality of life is on the line.” Papagni summed it up simply: Dayna Ghirardelli isn’t just defending agriculture — she’s defending common sense.

The January 28 edition of the AgNet News Hour delivered one of the most detailed and urgent updates yet on the unfolding Potter Valley water crisis, as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill sat down with longtime local veterinarian Rich Brazil to explain what’s truly at stake if the Potter Valley Project dams are removed. The message was clear: this isn’t just a Northern California issue — it’s a warning for every rural community in the state. Brazil, who has lived and worked in Potter Valley for 38 years, explained that the region’s farms, ranches, homes, and businesses exist because of a century-old water diversion system connecting the Eel River to the Russian River watershed. That small diversion — roughly 30,000 acre-feet — represents less than one-half of one percent of the Eel River’s annual flow, yet supports agriculture, domestic water supplies, fire protection, and entire rural economies downstream. Environmental groups are pushing to remove Scott Dam and Cape Horn Dam, arguing that free-flowing rivers will restore fish populations. Brazil countered that argument with hard data. Over the past 20 years, diversion flows have already been cut by 60 to 80 percent, yet salmon numbers have continued to decline. “That tells you the problem isn’t the water diversion,” Brazil said. “It’s habitat issues, predators, and offshore impacts.” One of the most alarming consequences Brazil outlined is what would happen if the dams were removed outright. Behind the dams sit an estimated 20 to 40 million cubic yards of sediment. If released, that material could bury the river system in silt, destroying spawning habitat and harming the very fish the removals are meant to protect. Meanwhile, communities would lose reliable water overnight. Domestic wells would dry up, farmland would be abandoned, and property values would collapse. Brazil emphasized that local leaders have repeatedly proposed compromise solutions — including fish ladders and infrastructure upgrades — that would allow fish recovery while preserving water reliability for people. Those options, he said, were rejected outright. “This isn’t about sharing,” he warned. “This is about taking everything.” The conversation also touched on the broader political landscape. Brazil believes the Potter Valley dams have become symbolic targets in California’s aggressive environmental agenda, and that rural communities are being treated as expendable. However, he expressed cautious optimism thanks to recent engagement from U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins and NRCS Chief Aubrey J. D. Bettencourt, calling their involvement a turning point after years of being ignored at the state level. Papagni and McGill stressed that the Potter Valley fight mirrors other California battles — from wolves to water storage — where policy decisions are made far from the people who live with the consequences. As Brazil put it, “If this can happen here, it can happen anywhere.” The episode closed with a call for awareness, engagement, and persistence. “Sunlight matters,” Brazil said. “When people understand what’s really happening, common sense still has a chance.”

The January 27 edition of the AgNet News Hour took a deep and urgent look at one of California agriculture’s most emotionally charged and fast-growing crises: wolves. Hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill were joined by Assemblymember Heather Hadwick, who represents California’s massive and rural District 1, stretching across much of the state’s northern tier. Her message was blunt—California’s current wolf policies are failing ranchers, rural families, and public safety. Hadwick explained that while wolves have been present in Northern California for several years, the situation has escalated dramatically. Declining deer, elk, and antelope populations have left wolves without adequate natural food sources, pushing them closer to ranches, schools, and neighborhoods. In some areas, wolf packs have killed more than 100 head of cattle in a single season, devastating family ranching operations that were already struggling with rising costs. What frustrates ranchers most, Hadwick said, is that California law leaves them virtually powerless. Wolves are so heavily protected that ranchers cannot haze them, deter them, or defend their livestock without risking legal consequences. “They’re being asked to watch their livelihoods be destroyed,” she said, “and they aren’t even allowed to protect their own property.” The problem goes beyond livestock losses. Hadwick described growing fear in rural communities, where wolves have been spotted near schools, playgrounds, and homes. Parents are hesitant to let their children play outside, and ranchers are spending sleepless nights patrolling calving grounds. “There’s an emotional and mental toll here that no compensation check can fix,” she said. Hadwick contrasted California’s approach with neighboring states and even Canada, where wolf populations are managed with clearer rules that balance wildlife conservation and human safety. In California, she said, predator management is fragmented, with wolves, bears, and mountain lions all handled separately—despite exploding populations and shrinking habitat. Bears alone are now estimated at more than 65,000 statewide, with some of the highest concentrations in her district. To address the crisis, Hadwick is introducing legislation aimed at improving transparency, response time, and public safety authority. One proposal would allow local sheriffs to act when wolves pose an immediate threat, while another would require real-time tracking data so ranchers know when wolves are nearby—rather than learning hours later after livestock has been killed. Papagni and McGill agreed the issue isn’t about eliminating wolves, but about restoring balance. Other states have proven coexistence is possible when policy reflects reality on the ground. Hadwick warned that without change, California risks pushing ranchers into desperate situations—and losing more of its rural communities in the process. “This is about common sense,” she said. “And it’s about protecting the people who produce our food.”

The January 26 edition of the AgNet News Hour focused on a crop that helped build the Central Valley—but is now fighting for survival: California raisins. Hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill welcomed legendary raisin industry leader Kalem Barserian, former CEO of the Raisin Bargaining Association, for a blunt, behind-the-scenes look at why raisin consumption is falling, why growers are struggling, and what it will take to keep the industry alive. Barserian, who’s spent 65 years in the raisin business, explained that California used to dominate the world raisin market. But today, the state has dropped to fourth globally, and he warned it could slide even further. The biggest issue isn’t just foreign competition—it’s demand. “People aren’t eating dry grapes,” Barserian said, pointing to changing consumer habits since COVID, more snack options on grocery shelves, and a major lack of domestic advertising. The numbers paint a stark picture. In 2016, California shipped about 320,000 tons of raisins. Last season, that total fell to around 170,000 tons—nearly cut in half in less than a decade. Production this year is expected to land near 180,000 tons, which means if sales don’t increase, surplus inventory will keep growing and prices to growers will stay weak. Barserian also emphasized how rapidly raisin grape acreage has collapsed. He said California once had about 280,000 acres of Thompson Seedless raisin grapes in 2000—but now that number is down to roughly 70,000 acres, with another 20,000 acres in newer overhead drying systems. He predicted that within ten years, traditional Thompson vineyards could be nearly gone, replaced by newer varieties and drying methods that are fully mechanized and more reliable in unpredictable weather. A major focus of the episode was a critical meeting in Washington, D.C., where raisin industry leaders were meeting with USDA to request additional government support. Barserian said USDA has already committed to purchasing $20 million worth of raisins, and the industry is pushing for another $70 million to support school lunch and food assistance programs. If approved, that could remove roughly 15,000 tons from the supply chain and help stabilize the market. Nick and Josh also debated the marketing problem—especially how to get kids eating raisins again. With milk and other products using colorful packaging and fun messaging to reach young consumers, Papagni argued raisins need that same energy, even suggesting the return of the classic “Dancing Raisins” campaign. Barserian agreed that the old campaign worked, but stressed that private-label dominance makes generic advertising difficult unless the industry unites behind a bigger effort. The takeaway from this episode was clear: raisins aren’t just a snack—they’re part of California’s farming identity. But if growers are going to survive, the industry needs stronger demand, stronger support, and a path forward that rewards farming families instead of pushing them out.

The January 23 edition of the AgNet News Hour delivered one of the most emotional and urgent interviews of the year as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill zeroed in on the growing crisis in Potter Valley—a Northern California farming region now facing the potential removal of two dams that support water, jobs, and everyday life for hundreds of thousands of people. Papagni opened the show by saying this issue should stop every listener in their tracks, because what’s happening in Potter Valley isn’t just a local fight—it’s a warning for rural communities across the state. The guest was Todd Lands, Vice Mayor and former Mayor of Cloverdale, who explained how the Potter Valley Project depends on two dams: Scott Dam (which forms Lake Pillsbury) and Cape Horn Dam, which diverts water to help create Lake Mendocino and supports power generation. Lands said the state’s long-running push to remove dams in the name of “free-flowing rivers” would devastate the region. If the dams are removed, Potter Valley becomes a dry basin, farmland values collapse, and farming and ranching communities could disappear almost overnight. Even areas far beyond Potter Valley—including wine country—depend heavily on this system because the diversion supplies a large portion of the Russian River’s flow. One of the most striking moments of the episode came when Lands described what daily life could look like without the water system in place: families choosing between taking a shower or doing laundry, residents losing gardens that help feed their households, and water shortages weakening local fire protection during peak wildfire season. He warned that the situation would also trigger enormous cost increases for residents, estimating that utility bills could become unbearable for most working families. Lands also challenged the argument that dam removal will restore a thriving fishery. He said the dams only block about two miles of river, and there is evidence that removal won’t meaningfully improve salmon and trout recovery. In fact, he warned it could make conditions worse by reducing water volume and raising river temperatures—creating a tougher environment for fish survival. Perhaps most frustrating, Lands said, is that there was a practical compromise. An independent engineering report identified upgrading the dams and installing a fish ladder as the best, most cost-effective option—but that path was reportedly shut down because it didn’t satisfy activist demands. The hosts emphasized that this is not a partisan issue. Lands noted that both Republicans and Democrats have voiced support for keeping the Potter Valley dams because “water is life,” and because the consequences of losing the project would ripple far beyond one small town. Papagni and McGill agreed—calling this the same “fish versus people” fight California has seen before, with real communities paying the price. Lands said local leaders tried to work through state channels but were repeatedly told it was “too late” and the outcome was already decided. That’s when the effort reached the federal level. He credited U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins and NRCS Chief Aubrey Bettencourt for stepping in, saying their involvement gave the community hope when state leadership would not. As the episode wrapped, Lands issued a call to action for California agriculture: write letters, contact elected officials, and demand transparency. His warning to every farming community was simple—if the state can do this to Potter Valley, it can do it to anyone.

The January 22 edition of the AgNet News Hour tackled a growing concern many California growers know all too well—foreign competition flooding the market during peak domestic seasons. Hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill focused the conversation on California pears, featuring an interview with Chris Zanobini, Executive Director of the California Pear Advisory Board, who laid out why the state’s pear industry is fighting for survival. Zanobini explained that California’s pear industry is relatively small, with only about 60 growers remaining—many of them fifth- and sixth-generation family farmers. Pear orchards can remain productive for decades, meaning these farms represent long-term investment and deep roots in rural communities. But now, he says, the industry’s short and carefully managed marketing window is being disrupted by imported pears arriving at the worst possible time. California pears typically harvest beginning in early July and aim to finish shipping by late October to avoid competing with other domestic pear-growing regions like Oregon and Washington. The problem, Zanobini said, is that Argentine pears are coming into the U.S. in heavy volume during June, July, and even into September, right when California is trying to sell its crop. The result is a market that starts the season already flooded, with retailers delaying California programs by weeks. One major concern Zanobini highlighted is a product commonly used overseas called 1-MCP, a ripening inhibitor that allows pears to store for an extremely long time, but often prevents them from ripening properly. That can lead to a poor consumer experience—hard, disappointing fruit that hurts pear demand overall. California, he noted, made a commitment years ago not to use 1-MCP because of its impact on eating quality. The competitive imbalance comes down to cost. Zanobini said California growers face the highest production standards in the world—labor, chemical restrictions, water requirements, and environmental compliance—yet they aren’t paid extra for meeting those standards. Imported pears, meanwhile, can arrive cheaper by $5 to $10 per box, making them attractive to retailers focused on price and margins. Zanobini also shared a jaw-dropping stat: Argentina imported more than 1.3 million boxes of pears, which exceeded California’s production of Bartlett pears this year—California’s primary variety. He said the industry can’t tolerate that trajectory much longer, and without change, more multi-generation pear farms could disappear. Papagni and McGill pointed out that this isn’t just a pear problem—it’s a California agriculture problem, impacting everything from citrus to tomatoes to raisins. Their message to listeners was simple: California growers need a fair playing field, and consumers can help by asking for domestic fruit and supporting local farmers when it’s in season.

The January 21 edition of the AgNet News Hour was a full-on technology showcase as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill explored the fast-changing world of ag automation—from spray drones to millimeter-accurate weed control to bloom-time disease protection in almonds. The message was clear: for California growers facing rising labor costs and tighter margins, innovation isn’t a luxury anymore—it’s survival. The show opened with Papagni on the road in Salinas, sharing a quick reminder about heavy fog across the Central Valley and then jumping into a conversation about why marketing matters, even in agriculture. The hosts pointed to how companies like Crystal Creamery are adding kid-friendly games and facts to milk cartons, small changes that can boost long-term consumer demand through smart branding. From there, the episode shifted hard into ag tech with a featured interview with Arthur Erickson, co-founder of Hylio, a U.S.-based company manufacturing large agricultural drones designed for heavy-payload crop applications. Erickson described Helio’s newest machine, the Atlas drone, as a massive unit capable of operating at around 550 pounds fully loaded, making it more like a small flying workhorse than a hobby drone. He also shared major industry news: the administration is moving toward restricting foreign-made drones and critical drone components, opening the door for American manufacturers to grow quickly and compete at scale. Erickson explained that drone applications can generate strong return on investment depending on the crop and use case, with research showing drones can outperform traditional tractor applications due to improved canopy penetration and reduced spray volume. Just as importantly, he emphasized ease of use: because the drones fly autonomously, both young operators and older farmers can learn quickly and put the technology to work. Next, Papagni interviewed Chad Yagow of Verdant Robotics, a company turning heads with its “aim before it applies” system called the Sharpshooter. Yagow explained that the machine uses AI and 3D field mapping to identify weeds and crops in real time and deliver micro-targeted applications, reducing liquid use by 96 to 99 percent compared to broadcast spraying. The system mounts on a standard three-point hitch tractor and is designed to be lightweight, fuel-efficient, and usable in softer field conditions where heavier rigs struggle. To close out the episode, Cowboy Dale interviewed Kendall Johnson of UPL, focusing on almond bloom-time disease protection. Johnson stressed that bloom is the most vulnerable window for disease entry and highlighted threats like brown rot, jacket rot, blossom blight, shot hole, scab, bacterial blast, and botrytis. He recommended strong timing from pink bud through bloom and emphasized rotating fungicide modes of action to prevent resistance. Johnson also highlighted Axios 20SC, a newer fungicide option with a unique mode of action and potential value for summer diseases like Alternaria as well. Between drones in the sky, precision sprayers on the ground, and smarter bloom programs in the orchard, this episode was a reminder that the future of farming is arriving fast—and California growers are right in the middle of it.

The January 20 edition of the AgNet News Hour tackled one of the biggest questions facing farmers right now: Can California agriculture stay competitive when costs keep rising and regulations never seem to slow down? Hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill opened the show with a safety reminder for Central Valley drivers dealing with heavy fog, then shifted into an eye-opening interview with national keynote speaker, farmer, and ag business host Damian Mason, an “outsider looking in” who didn’t hold back on what he sees happening in California. Mason, who farms in Indiana and has spent significant time speaking to California agriculture groups, said California’s biggest challenge is simple: farmers are outnumbered politically, and the economic engine of the Bay Area distorts how the state treats agriculture. He explained that California can “punish” farming with regulations without feeling immediate pain statewide, because most residents don’t directly work in the industry, yet the impact lands hard on the people producing the food. One of the most striking points Mason made was about the unique advantage California has, a Mediterranean climate found in only a handful of places worldwide. He warned that strangling farming in a state that grows hundreds of crops isn’t just bad policy, it’s reckless. “You have something God-given that other places can’t replicate,” Mason said, urging leaders to stop treating agriculture like an afterthought. Papagni and McGill agreed that growers are expected to comply with expensive rules—without getting paid more for it, while cheaper commodities roll in from countries with lower labor costs and less regulation. Mason compared California to Peru and pointed out that global competitors now have stronger infrastructure and investment than they did a decade ago, meaning the old U.S. advantage in transport and scale is shrinking fast. The discussion also turned to labor and automation, with the hosts noting that California growers are desperate for innovation, yet policies like Cal/OSHA restrictions make it harder to adopt technologies like autonomous tractors. Mason said California’s energy contradictions, like blackouts while mandating electric systems, are part of the bigger pattern of policy not matching reality. Still, Mason ended with optimism. He said national attention on real food, produce, and protein could be a major tailwind for California. If consumer trends continue shifting toward whole foods, specialty crops could benefit, especially in the state that grows more fresh commodities than anywhere else in the country. To wrap the episode, Papagni also caught up with Todd Burkdoll of Valent USA, who shared timely seasonal advice for citrus and almond growers, including winter orchard floor management and staying ahead of disease threats like Red Leaf Blotch with early fungicide timing.

The January 19 episode of the AgNet News Hour kicked off with plenty of energy as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill mixed farm talk, policy, and global trade into a show that felt like a preview of what 2026 could bring for California agriculture. Early in the episode, Papagni and McGill reacted to Governor Gavin Newsom’s newly announced $348.9 billion California budget, noting it’s grown dramatically since he took office. The hosts raised concerns about what that kind of spending means for small businesses and agriculture in the most heavily regulated state in the country. Papagni pointed out that the budget has increased by more than 70% and warned that California “has no idea how to spend money” while farmers and rural communities keep feeling squeezed. From state politics, the show shifted into soil health and crop efficiency with Russell Taylor of Live Earth, a company mining humate deposits in Utah and turning them into soil amendments designed to help farmers make better use of fertilizer and water. Taylor explained humates as an ancient plant deposit—essentially “really old compost”—that can improve soil structure, nutrient retention, and water holding capacity, especially in tough California conditions like high salt and low organic matter. Taylor also noted that California’s evolving regulations around soil amendments and biostimulant labeling could actually be favorable for growers and manufacturers in 2026. He stressed that products like humic and fulvic acids aren’t “fancy chemicals,” but natural tools that help form soil aggregates—reducing compaction, improving infiltration, and keeping fertilizer in the root zone longer. For farmers trying to stretch every dollar, Taylor said the goal isn’t necessarily “use less fertilizer,” but to get more yield out of the same inputs through better efficiency. One of the most memorable parts of the interview was Taylor’s backstory. He shared how Live Earth began as a family operation after his father left coal mining following a tragic mine fire. What started with shovels, bathroom scales, and hand-sewn bags has grown into a product now widely recognized across the Central Valley. As Papagni put it, “That could be a movie.” Later in the show, listeners got a major international update from Cowboy Dale’s interview with USDA Undersecretary Luke Lindberg, who had just returned from a trade mission in Malaysia. Lindberg explained that the agreement is designed to reduce barriers by having Malaysia formally recognize the U.S. food system as safe—something he said could unlock broad new opportunities for American agriculture, including California tree nuts, apples, wine, and more. Lindberg also highlighted efforts to improve access for halal-certified U.S. beef and dairy, noting strong demand in Malaysia and a big jump in exports like cheese. He emphasized that the administration is focused on shrinking the trade deficit and creating more reciprocal agreements, saying the U.S. is forecasted to improve its trade deficit by roughly $13 billion compared to last year. The bottom line from this episode: California farmers are dealing with major pressures at home, but new tools in the soil and new markets overseas could provide real momentum in 2026—if the state can stop getting in its own way.

The January 16 edition of the AgNet News Hour delivered one of the most wide-ranging conversations of the week as hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill continued their coverage from Anaheim and welcomed Shannon Douglas, President of the California Farm Bureau, for a deep look at the biggest issues facing California agriculture in 2026. From water storage and labor reform to predator pressure and autonomous equipment, Douglas made one thing clear: California farmers are resilient—but they can’t keep carrying the weight of broken policies forever. Douglas opened by emphasizing how important it is for agriculture leaders across the country to see the real California—not just the beaches and Hollywood. She reminded listeners that California agriculture is a $62 billion industry, and many out-of-state farmers were stunned by how much food is actually grown in the Golden State. A major theme of the episode was the overwhelming question Douglas hears everywhere: How do California farmers survive under this many regulations? Douglas credited that survival to the toughness of the people who farm here. “California farmers adapt, they get creative, and they find ways to survive,” she said—but she also acknowledged that it’s a brutally hard time, and that support is needed now. Douglas said Farm Bureau’s top priorities moving forward include labor reform at the federal level, where she believes there may finally be a window of opportunity to improve the system. She also pointed to predator issues, including wolves, as a growing crisis that is costing producers heavily and expanding into new areas. Recent incidents have even included wolves taking down a horse near homes—an alarming signal that the situation is escalating. Another major 2026 focus will be the fight to legalize and modernize autonomous farm equipment in California. Douglas highlighted the absurd reality that some manufacturers are releasing autonomous equipment for every contiguous state—except California—because it still isn’t legal here. She said Farm Bureau is preparing to push hard to ensure California farmers aren’t left behind while the rest of the country moves forward. Water was also front and center, with Douglas saying that being “out of drought” doesn’t mean water security has been solved. Farmers still need reliable allocation, groundwater recharge planning, and real infrastructure. She expressed cautious optimism about renewed momentum for major storage projects like Sites Reservoir, saying there are signs of activity that could finally move the project forward. Papagni and McGill wrapped the show by identifying what they called California agriculture’s “big five” challenges: regulations, water, labor, freight, and foreign competition, with wolves quickly rising as another major pressure point. The message of the episode was simple: California farming is still the best in the world—but if the state wants agriculture to remain strong, it’s time to bring back common sense.

The AgNet News Hour brings listeners inside the 2026 American Farm Bureau Federation Convention in Anaheim, California, highlighting the latest in farm policy, California agriculture, and industry trends. Hosts Nick Papagni, “the Ag Meter”, and Sir Josh McGill provide firsthand coverage from the convention floor, where farmers, ranchers, policymakers, and industry leaders come together to share insights and discuss solutions to the biggest challenges facing agriculture today. A key highlight of the episode is Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins’ speech, detailing significant initiatives for U.S. farmers. From H-2A labor reforms projected to save farmers over $2 billion annually, to expanded Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) programs, enhanced dairy support, and efforts to rebuild the cattle herd, Rollins emphasizes both immediate and long-term support for producers. The hosts note the importance of federal engagement in California agriculture, especially amid water challenges, regulatory pressures, and emerging predation concerns. The podcast also features an in-depth interview with Bailey Corwine, Communications Manager for the American Farm Bureau Federation. She explains how the convention functions as a “family reunion” for farmers nationwide, showcasing award-winning county and state programs, fostering young farmer and rancher initiatives, and promoting national advocacy. Listeners also get up-to-date California agriculture insights, including almond market news. December shipments exceeded expectations, with strong export demand from India, the Middle East, and Europe pushing total 2025 crop receipts over 2.5 billion pounds. High-quality almonds continue to strengthen California’s position in global markets. From exclusive interviews with Farm Bureau leaders to updates on water, predator control, and crop policy, this episode offers a complete look at California agriculture today. Tune in to hear expert insights, convention highlights, and on-the-ground reporting that every farmer, rancher, and agriculture enthusiast will value.

The January 14 edition of the AgNet News Hour brought a packed lineup for California farmers—covering everything from federal attention on state ag issues to real-world energy solutions growers can actually use. Hosts Nick Papagni and Josh McGill broadcast with a strong message: 2026 is shaping up to be a major turning point for California agriculture. One of the biggest highlights came from Anaheim, where Papagni attended the American Farm Bureau Federation gathering and spoke with U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins. Rollins made it clear she’s paying close attention to California—especially when it comes to regulations, water, labor, and the future of farming in the state. Her visit alone sent a signal that Washington sees California ag as too important to ignore, even with ongoing political tension between state and federal leadership. A major topic Rollins addressed was Potter Valley, where local stakeholders are fighting to preserve the Scott and Cape Horn dams—dams that have supported water needs in the region for over a century. Rollins called the push to remove them “reckless,” arguing that tearing them out in the name of environmental extremism puts “fish over people” and threatens food security. She said she formally stepped into the issue on December 19 by intervening in proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and promised updates soon. Rollins also highlighted a long list of federal actions aimed at easing the pressure on farmers nationwide, including changes to labor rules, trade deals, and support programs. Most importantly, she emphasized that her goal isn’t for growers to “farm for a government check,” but to be profitable enough to support their families and pass farms down to the next generation. Later in the program, the spotlight shifted to farm energy and input costs as the show featured an interview with Mike Newland of the Propane Education & Research Council. Newland explained how propane is becoming a stronger option for agriculture—especially as power grid strain increases nationwide. He discussed propane applications ranging from backup generators and irrigation engines to innovative tools like steam-based soil treatments that can reduce reliance on fumigants, plus flame weeding systems that may help organic growers control weeds efficiently. Papagni and McGill agreed the message was clear: whether it’s water fights, regulatory battles, or on-farm energy decisions, California growers need more tools in the toolbox. And with input costs still high and uncertainty ahead, planning for alternatives—and staying plugged into what’s happening at both the state and federal level—has never been more important.