Advertise on podcast: SafetyAtWorkBlog

What does good leadership really look like when it comes to creating mentally healthy, safe workplaces? In Episode 2 of Safe Work Real Talk, Michael Plowright and Kevin Jones unpack the difference between leadership and management, challenge familiar leadership clichés, and explore how decisions made by boards, executives and middle managers shape psychosocial safety. They discuss what happens when a leader becomes a workplace hazard, why HR and OHS need to work together, and how fair processes, risk management and systems thinking can support healthier organisational cultures. It’s an honest, practical conversation about accountability, psychological safety, workplace conflict and the systems organisations need to select, support and assess leaders effectively. Duration: 41 minutes Get in touch: [email protected]

Safe Work, Real Talk is a limited-series conversation about psychosocial hazards and psychological safety at work. Hosts Kevin Jones and Michael Plowright bring together OHS practice, workplace-bullying research and lived workplace realities to examine what causes harm, and what organisations can do differently. Drawing on their experiences, Kevin and Michael discuss bullying and harassment, leadership, work design, risk management, regulation, support after harm and the future of healthier workplaces. Each episode combines candid discussion with practical takeaways for workers, leaders, OHS practitioners and anyone interested in safer, more respectful work. Questions are welcome at [email protected] Note: The podcast reflects the hosts’ personal views and experiences and is provided for general discussion only. It is not legal advice.

This episode examines Victoria’s work-from-home debate through an occupational health and safety lens, cutting through the political noise, business lobby claims, and media commentary to ask what evidence is actually being used. Rather than treating working from home as a workplace perk or productivity threat, the script argues that it is a redesign of work — and therefore a redesign of risk. It explores psychosocial hazards, fatigue, surveillance, commuting risks, hazard reporting, supervision, vulnerable workers, and the responsibilities of employers and government. At its core, the episode calls for Victoria’s Parliamentary Committee and business groups to move beyond slogans and self-reported sentiment, and to engage with independently verified OHS evidence about how remote work can be made safe, fair, and sustainable.

This episode examines Victoria’s new Royal Commission into the integrity of major construction projects, arguing that occupational health and safety must be treated as more than a compliance phrase or political shield. I explore how safety can be used, ignored or manipulated across procurement, government contracts, builders and unions, and ask whether the inquiry will confront the shared responsibility behind unsafe or unethical practices in the construction sector. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com. If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

This commentary offers a critical look at BHP’s latest Annual Report, exploring how the company presents safety, how it buries sexual harassment data in its Sustainability chapter, and why psychosocial hazards deserve to sit alongside traditional injury metrics. It reflects on the cultural challenges of retrofitting modern OHS expectations into a 141 year old organisation, questions the effectiveness of BHP’s prevention claims, and argues for greater transparency, stronger contractor oversight and genuine cultural leadership across Australia’s mining sector. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer. ________________________________________

This episode examines concussion, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), duty of care and occupational health and safety in Australian sport, drawing on many SafetyAtWorkBlog articles about the AFL, Nick Lowden, player welfare, junior football, contact training, compensation and the limits of “awareness” as a safety response. It asks whether professional sport should be treated more clearly as work, whether repeated head impacts are a foreseeable workplace hazard, and what sporting bodies must do when prevention may require changing the game itself. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

This episode looks at the HR spin on burnout and exposes what’s really going on: unsafe work design and breached OHS duties. Using a recent media story about a government IT contract demanding 24/7 availability, I ask why psychosocial hazards aren’t “invisible threats”; they’re predictable outcomes of poor procurement, bad management, and ignored legal obligations. Burnout isn’t complex through an OHS lens: redesign the work, resource it properly, and stop pretending prevention is optional. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

This episode explores how Farm Safety Week continues to repeat familiar themes while WorkSafe Victoria quietly shifts its messaging toward the real issue: farmers becoming desensitised to risk. Drawing on Sam Jenkin’s recent Country Hour interview and WorkSafe’s powerful new farm safety advertisement, the monologue examines the fine line regulators must walk between honesty and diplomacy, the dangers of normalising hazardous tasks, and the role of engineering controls, PPE and personal responsibility in preventing tractor and vehicle rollovers. It’s a reflection on complacency, culture and the emotional pull of returning home safely — and a reminder that farm safety improves through deliberate effort, not habit or folklore. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

This episode examines why some Australian business leaders continue to resist working from home despite evidence showing no productivity loss and clear mental‑health benefits. With Victoria preparing to legislate a limited WFH right, the debate has become more ideological than evidence‑based, shaped by political positioning, managerial mistrust, and even leadership psychology. Drawing on recent research from the AFR, The Conversation and ANU, this episode explores the gap between what the data shows and what some bosses prefer to believe, arguing that hybrid work is already the practical middle ground, whether business groups want to admit it or not. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

Kevin Jones reflects on the death of Brodie Panlock, the workplace bullying case that helped reshape Australian thinking about psychosocial hazards, prevention, and OHS responsibility. This episode considers what workplaces should have learned from the tragedy, beyond just law reform and public outrage. It contains discussion of work-related suicide. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

KPMG is the latest major firm exposed for unethical conduct — misusing confidential client data, misleading investigators, and failing to protect whistleblowers. It follows a decade of corporate scandals across banking, finance, consulting and law, all involving cultural failures that intersect with OHS obligations. This episode examines why these repeated leadership failures matter for psychological health and safety, why traditional corporate “culture change” is largely illusory, and why regulators may now be the only credible mechanism left to address organisational harm. In a landscape where executives exit comfortably and workers exit damaged, the case for stronger regulatory intervention has never been clearer. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer

A 23‑year‑old footballer, Nick Lowden, died with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), the youngest known case linked to Australian rules football. His story exposes a risk the AFL can no longer treat as “rough and tumble” or part of the game. Concussion protocols were ignored, symptoms escalated, and the cumulative impacts of routine head knocks were never explained to him or his family. This episode examines how foreseeable harm intersects with SFAIRP duties, why cumulative brain trauma is now a governance issue rather than a medical debate, and what Nick’s case reveals about the gap between AFL messaging and its legal obligations. It’s a sober look at a system that still treats brain injury as an acceptable cost of play, and the consequences when it does

In this episode, Kevin Jones reflects on key insights from the 2026 International Association on Workplace Bullying and Harassment conference in Canberra. He explores why policies, training, and awareness campaigns often fall short in managing psychosocial risks at work, and argues that lasting change requires stronger systems, clearer definitions, and deeper organisational reform. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

A clear-eyed look at why Australia’s productivity debate is really a debate about work design. This episode unpacks the mismatch between old industrial‑era metrics and today’s knowledge‑and‑care economy, showing how performance, psychosocial risk, and productivity are all symptoms of the same system. A call for OHS to step into the national conversation with the maturity it has long developed. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.

A sharp look at the latest corporate scandal and what it reveals about the widening gap between leadership rhetoric and workplace reality. This episode argues that repeated ethical failures across major firms aren’t just governance issues — they’re psychosocial hazards — and makes the case for stronger regulatory intervention when organisations refuse to change themselves. For the full article with quotes and references, subscribe at www.safetyatworkblog.com . If you like what you hear, consider engaging Kevin as an OHS advisor or writer.