Advertise on podcast: NJ Criminal Podcast

How reliable is facial recognition technology in criminal investigations, and what information must prosecutors disclose when that technology helps identify a suspect? In this episode of the New Jersey Criminal Podcast, Deputy Public Defender Tamar Lehrer examines the New Jersey Supreme Court's consideration of facial recognition technology (FRT), criminal discovery, and the constitutional implications of technology-assisted suspect identification. At the center of the discussion is State v. Tibere Miles, a case arising from a Jersey City shooting investigation involving surveillance footage, a confidential informant, an Instagram identification, and a subsequent facial recognition search. Lehrer explores how investigators use facial recognition software, why a potential match is not necessarily a reliable identification, and what defense attorneys need to know to meaningfully challenge technology-generated evidence. Topics discussed include: How facial recognition technology is used in New Jersey criminal investigations. The role of confidential informants and surveillance video in suspect identification. Why facial recognition results can produce multiple possible matches. Criminal discovery obligations when prosecutors rely on facial recognition evidence. The defense's ability to examine the technology, procedures, and underlying identification process. The broader implications for due process, evidence reliability, and wrongful convictions. Why This Matters As law enforcement increasingly relies on artificial intelligence and automated identification tools, New Jersey courts face important questions about transparency, reliability, and defendants' rights. This conversation examines the intersection of emerging technology and established criminal procedure, with practical implications for criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, investigators, and anyone interested in the future of digital evidence. Listen to the New Jersey Criminal Podcast for legal analysis and conversations with attorneys examining criminal law, constitutional protections, and significant developments in New Jersey's justice system. This podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Understanding Self-Defense in New Jersey: A Case Study with Melissa Rosenblum In a recent discussion, we dive into the intricacies of self-defense laws in New Jersey, particularly focusing on a high-profile case involving Mary Lou Wigglesworth. Represented by criminal defense attorney Melissa Rosenbloom, Marylue faced serious charges following a tragic incident on December 25, 2024, when she shot her husband, David Wigglesworth. Youtube chapter links for full Wigglesworth Christmas day shooting case breakdown - by Marylou's defense attorney, Melissa Rosenblum (Atlantic City) Wigglesworth Case Breakdown: 00:00 - Show Intro: Melissa Rosenblum on the Wigglesworth Murder Case 01:47 - The 911 Call: What Marylue Told Police That Night 02:48 - Case Background: How Marylue Wigglesworth Was Charged With Murder 05:00 - Why the State's Early Theory Missed the Domestic Violence Evidence 06:56 - Shock, Trauma, and Alcohol: Why Her Statement Wasn't Coherent 08:52 - Finding the Bruises: Documenting Abuse Within 24 Hours 10:46 - A 30-Year History of Domestic Violence: Why She Didn't Leave 12:28 - New Jersey Has No Bail: How Criminal Justice Reform Works 14:40 - Appealing Pretrial Detention to Get Self-Defense on the Record 17:12 - Indicted for Murder: Building the Case Timeline 18:09 - No Trial: Why Mary Lou Pled Guilty Instead 18:20 - The Forensic Psychologist Who Changed the Case: Dr. Dawn Hughes 20:22 - "He Put the Gun to Her Head": What Mary Lou Remembers 21:44 - New Jersey Self-Defense Law and the Strict Duty to Retreat 22:20 - Why the Law and the Psychology of Trauma Don't Match 25:23 - From Murder to Manslaughter: The Passion/Provocation Statute 28:00 - Should the Wigglesworth Case Have Gone to Trial? 31:12 - Why a Jury Trial Is Always a Gamble, Even in Strong Cases 34:25 - Jury Nullification and How Juries Really Deliberate 36:54 - Negotiating the Plea: How the Six-Year Sentence Was Reached 38:37 - Take the Plea or Roll the Dice? Weighing the Risk of Trial 41:30 - The Power Prosecutors Hold Through Charging Decisions 44:23 - New Jersey's Second-Degree Strangulation Law, Explained 47:57 - Probable Cause vs. Proof: Why Strangulation Is Easy to Charge 50:41 - How an Unnecessary Law Change Made Overcharging Easier 52:36 - What Is the Right 911 Call After a Self-Defense Shooting? 54:35 - The Hard Truth About Self-Defense Cases: The Winner Gets Charged 56:45 - The One-Punch Case: A Single Blow, a Second-Degree Charge 58:33 - Is New Jersey a Mutual Combat State? 59:43 - How Prosecutors Use Charging Power as Leverage 1:00:54 - Are Strangulation Charges Rising Statewide? 1:01:32 - Upcoming Episodes: New Jersey Supreme Court Case Updates 1:03:52 - Wrongful Arrests and Flock License Plate Reader Errors 1:05:48 - A Corrections Officer's Wrongful Charge: Inside a Four-Week Trial 1:08:12 - Why He Couldn't Face a Retrial 1:09:46 - 11 to 1: The Juror Whose Bias Nearly Changed the Verdict 1:14:45 - Reading the Jury Right: Lessons From an Unpredictable Trial 1:17:22 - Why Criminal Defense Attorneys Matter: Closing Thoughts

This NJCP features Jessica Frisina, a Rutgers Law professor and former public defender, explaining the US Supreme Court's opinion in Villa Real v. Texas. She joins Meg McCormick Hoerner to outline the implications of the case on attorney ethics, conferral orders, and the balance between effective defense and truthful testimony.key topics Supreme Court's opinion in Villa Real v TexasConferral orders and Sixth Amendment rightsDistinction between total bans and partial restrictionsEthical obligations of defense attorneysImplications for trial practice and court orders resources Villa Real v Texas Supreme Court Opinion - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1234_abc.pdf Geters v United States (1976) - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/425/148.html Perry v Leek (1989) - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/488/272.html Rutgers Law School - https://law.rutgers.edu Jessica Frisina's Profile at Rutgers Law - https://law.rutgers.edu/faculty/jessica-frisina 00:00 Introduction to the Case and Guests 02:28 Overview of Villarreal v. Texas 06:43 Precedent Cases and Their Implications 10:33 The Balance of Rights and Ethical Obligations 19:17 Guidance for Attorneys Post-Decision 25:31 Concurrences and Broader Implications

Howard Dubner and Larry Czaplewski of Gann Law Books join host Meg McCormick Hoerner on the NJ Criminal Podcast to discuss the history of New Jersey legal publishing, the evolution of legal research, and the challenges of maintaining authoritative legal commentary in the age of AI. Founded in Newark in 1936, Gann Law Books has become one of the most recognized legal publishing organizations serving New Jersey attorneys, judges, and law firms. Howard and Larry provide a behind-the-scenes look at the editorial process behind New Jersey Court Rules, statutes, jury charges, and continuously updated online legal research systems used throughout the state. Topics include: - The evolution from traditional law libraries to online legal research - How Gann’s editors analyze and contextualize New Jersey case law - The launch of Gann’s online Criminal and Civil Model Jury Charge products - The risks of AI hallucinations in legal research - Why experienced human editorial review still matters - The future of legal publishing and attorney research tools in New Jersey Watch the full video episode and explore more NJ Criminal Podcast content: https://njcriminalpodcast.com Learn more about Gann Law Books: https://www.gannlaw.com/OnlineApp/GannLaw/index.cfm Produced in association with Jornio — EEAT-focused content systems and visibility strategies for law firms. https://jornio.com

Across New Jersey, small black boxes are appearing on poles at neighborhood entrances, intersections, and commercial corridors. They’re marketed as Flock Safety cameras – a “smart” tool to deter crime, recover stolen cars, and help police respond faster. Local officials repeat the vendor’s talking points: automatic license plate readers, privacy by design, 30‑day data retention, “we own the data, not Flock.” Residents are told not to worry. But when you step away from the marketing and look at internal logs from real deployments – especially the verified Flock event logs from Dunwoody, Georgia – a very different picture emerges: “License plate readers” quietly upgraded to full live‑view cameras. Data shared with over 1,200 external agencies, contrary to public assurances. Private camera networks labeled “Do Not Share” shared anyway. Flock employees in other states logging in to view cameras aimed at pools, gyms, preschool hallways, and gymnastics rooms. Phantom accounts and system users performing privileged actions with incomplete audit trails. For New Jersey residents, lawyers, journalists, and policymakers, this is not an abstract “other state’s problem.” Flock is actively selling and deploying the same architecture here, under the same narratives. This article lays out, in an EEAT‑friendly structure, why this matters and what professionals should be demanding before another camera goes up. Flock Safety is best understood as a data platform, not just a hardware vendor. The cameras are the sensors; the real power lives in Flock’s cloud software, FlockOS. Flock’s core devices fall into two broad categories: Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs) Capture high‑resolution images of passing vehicles. Extract plate number, date, time, and GPS coordinates. Tag “vehicle fingerprint” attributes: make, model, color, body style, visible damage, roof racks, bumper stickers. Enable searches like “blue Honda sedan with front‑left damage and a roof rack” without knowing the plate. Live‑view video cameras (e.g., Condor) Provide continuous or on‑demand video streams. Deployed at parks, dog parks, trails, intersections, city facilities, HOAs, schools, religious campuses, and private entities. Often support pan‑tilt‑zoom and low‑light capabilities. In practice, many deployments that began as “LPR only” have been quietly upgraded to live‑view video without a fresh public debate or contract rewrite. Residents who think they approved a plate scanner are now living under a city‑wide video grid. In FlockOS, authorized users can: Run exact or partial plate searches across all cameras they can access. Search by vehicle fingerprint: color, make, model, body style, roof racks, dents, decals. Use association / convoy analysis to find vehicles that frequently appear together, effectively mapping travel companions and potential “associates.” View live or recorded video from any shared live‑view camera (parks, schools, campuses, HOAs, businesses). Critically, Flock encourages agencies to share their networks with each other. A small town’s camera grid can quickly become part of a regional or national search space, depending on configuration and vendor‑enabled features. This is a qualitatively different system from a single, stand‑alone camera.

The New Jersey Supreme Court rarely reverses a conviction on cumulative error alone—but that’s exactly what happened in State v. Gerald W. Butler. Assistant NJ Deputy Public Defender Alison Gifford, who argued Butler on appeal, joins Former NJ prosecutor and Certified Criminal Trial Attorney Meg McCormick Hoerner to explain how pop‑culture analogies, “background” gun‑violence testimony, and search‑warrant language combined to tip a circumstantial drug case.​ In this episode, you’ll learn: The facts behind the Butler investigation, wiretap, and search warrant.​ Why the prosecutor’s reference to HBO’s The Wire in opening was risky, even though it wasn’t reversible error by itself.​ How repeated mentions of shootings, “Operation That’s All Folks,” and the Organized Crime Bureau created emotional undertones of uncharged violence.​ How State v. Cain limits search‑warrant testimony and why calling the defendant the “target” mattered here.​ The difference between harmless error and plain error—and why one well‑timed objection can preserve an issue for appeal.​ Who this episode is for New Jersey criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors Appellate practitioners looking for a fresh cumulative‑error case Law students and clerks studying standards of review and trial error Investigators and law enforcement officers who testify in criminal cases​ FAQ (Short Form) What is the main takeaway from State v. Butler?Cumulative trial errors that repeatedly invite the jury to see a defendant as violent or gang‑involved—without evidence in the record—can collectively deny a fair trial, even if no single error is reversible on its own.​ What should trial lawyers change after this decision?Prosecutors should keep forceful advocacy tied to the evidence of the charged offenses. Defense lawyers should preserve objections to pop‑culture analogies, extra‑evidentiary “background,” and search‑warrant bolstering, knowing those objections preserve a more favorable standard on appeal.​ Subscribe & Next Steps Follow NJ Criminal Podcast on Spotify so you don’t miss future episodes on major New Jersey criminal cases, trial tactics, and appellate decisions. If you’d like to bring your own true‑crime experience or criminal defense expertise to the show—and see firsthand how podcasting supports EEAT and SEO without starting your own podcast—visit NJCriminalPodcast.com to inquire about being a guest. To understand how AI and search currently see your firm, and to get a custom EEAT / AI strategy playbook for your law firm plus a usable content cluster just for participating in a walkthrough, visit Jornio.com and schedule a firm audit with Meg McCormick Hoerner, Tom Ritter and the Jornio team.

AI is already deciding which lawyers show up as the authority when scared consumers search “what happens if I was just arrested in New Jersey?”—long before they ever click on a website.​ In this episode, former NJ prosecutor and NJ Supreme Court Certified Criminal Trial Attorney Meg McCormick Hoerner talks with Tom Ritter of Jornio.com about how Google’s AI summaries and LLMs are changing the business of law in criminal and family practice.​ They cover:​ NJ’s new technology CLE requirement and how ethics regulators are talking about AI Why EEAT (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) matters more than generic SEO in 2026 How local, niche firms can beat big billboard budgets in AI summaries Practical steps small firms can take this week to stop diluting their authority online​ Tom also shares how Jornio maps a law firm’s real‑world authority against its EEAT and builds content clusters so AI can confidently surface that lawyer as the best match for specific case types and geographies.​ Learn more at Jornio.com and LegalPodcasting.com

Immigration attorney Derek DeCosmo discusses the current state of immigration law, highlighting significant challenges such as visa processing halts, the reevaluation of asylum cases, and the elimination of bail for immigrants. He emphasizes the impact of political influence on immigration judges and the tactics used by ICE, which have led to community unrest. The conversation also touches on the tragic case of Ms. Good, illustrating the broader implications of current immigration policies and the need for a more humane approach to immigration enforcement. Takeaways Derek DeCosmo has over 20 years of experience in immigration law. The current immigration landscape is marked by significant challenges. Visa processing has been halted for many countries, affecting families. Asylum and refugee cases are being reevaluated under new policies. The elimination of bail for immigrants has serious implications. Judicial review of immigration decisions is limited and complex. Immigration judges are selected based on political influence. New policies are affecting asylum seekers from specific countries. ICE tactics are causing community unrest and fear. Public perception of immigration issues is often shaped by sensational media. Sound bites "Visa processing has been halted for many countries." "Political influence on immigration courts is significant." "ICE tactics are causing community unrest and fear." Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Immigration Law Challenges 01:17 Current State of Immigration Law 04:18 Visa Processing Halts and Their Impact 06:11 Re-evaluating Asylum and Refugee Cases 10:31 The Role of Immigration Judges 14:52 Bail and Detention Issues 19:43 Political Influences on Immigration Decisions 22:15 International Agreements and Asylum Claims 24:19 The Human Cost of Immigration Policies 32:58 Legal Perspectives on Police Tactics 39:40 The Role of ICE and Constitutional Rights 49:43 Community Policing vs. Over-Policing 56:11 The Complexity of Immigration Cases

This episode digs into the infamous Lindbergh kidnapping trial of Richard "Bruno" Hauptmann, exploring the ethical failures of prosecutor David J Wilentz, media influence, and questionable evidence that characterized the case. Tom critiques the Wilentz, the NJ State Police, and prosecution's methods, and highlights the lessons learned in modern legal practices. This example of prosecutorial whore/pimp relationships emphasizes the importance of due process and impartiality in the justice system. takeaways The Lindbergh kidnapping trial serves as a cautionary tale for modern justice. Prosecutorial ethics were severely compromised in the Hauptmann case. The media frenzy surrounding the trial created an environment hostile to due process. Falsified evidence and shaky science plagued the prosecution's case. Alternative suspects were ignored, leading to a flawed investigation. The rush to judgment in high-profile cases can undermine justice. Modern courts have safeguards to prevent the issues seen in 1935. The legacy of the Hauptmann trial continues to influence legal standards today. Public sentiment should not dictate the pursuit of justice. The importance of transparency and ethical conduct in legal proceedings.📚 Foundational Prosecutorial Ethics and Duties 295 U.S. 78 (1935) U.S. Supreme Court decision establishing that prosecutors are “servants of the law” whose interest is that justice shall be done, not merely to win cases. [Full text (Justia)] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/295/78/) (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor Modern ethical rule outlining prosecutors’ duties, including disclosure of exculpatory evidence and ensuring the accused’s rights. [Full text (ABA)] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_3_8_special_responsibilities_of_a_prosecutor/ ⚖️ Evidentiary Standards 509 U.S. 579 (1993) Landmark decision creating the *Daubert standard* for admissibility of expert scientific testimony. [Full text (Justia)]( https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/ ---## ⚖️ Disclosure & False Testimony373 U.S. 83 (1963) Established the *Brady Rule* requiring prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence to the defense. [Full text (Justia)]( https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/373/83/360 U.S. 264 (1959) Prohibits prosecutors from knowingly using or failing to correct false testimony, even on credibility issues. [Full text (Justia)] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/360/264/ --- Fair Trial & Prejudicial Publicity 384 U.S. 333 (1966) Held that massive prejudicial publicity can deny a defendant a fair trial and courts must control publicity. [Full text (Justia)]( https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/333/ --- https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Lindbergh-Kidnapping-Suspect-1/Lise-Pearlman/9781402770033 https://www.overlookpress.com/products/cemetery-john “Hauptmann Signs Clemency Plea; Bid to Pardons Court for Life Term Expected on Monday” (Dec. 24, 1935) Contemporary report on ’s clemency plea and the trial atmosphere. [NYT Archive (subscription may be required)] https://www.nytimes.com/1935/12/24/archives/hauptmann-signs-clemency-plea-bid-to-pardons-court-for-life-term.html

Tom goes deep into the systemic issues surrounding human trafficking, particularly focusing on the recent revelations from Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony and the connections to high-profile individuals, including financial institutions and political figures. He highlights the alarming statistics of child trafficking in America, the role of banks in facilitating these crimes, and the ongoing cover-up that protects powerful individuals involved in these networks. The discussion emphasizes the urgent need for justice and accountability in a system that often prioritizes the protection of the elite over the safety of vulnerable children. takeaways Human trafficking is a $152 billion annual global economy with the U.S. responsible for one-third of the demand.448,000 children have vanished into the American system, highlighting a national crisis. The banking system is intricately linked to trafficking operations, enabling the exploitation of children. Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony reveals systemic corruption and cover-ups at the highest levels.Prince Andrew's connections to Epstein illustrate the intersection of royalty and exploitation. Michael Cohen's revelations about Trump and Epstein expose the lengths to which powerful individuals will go to protect themselves. The Epstein operation is characterized as a global intelligence blackmail network, implicating numerous high-profile figures. The ongoing cover-up of Epstein's crimes reflects a broader failure of the justice system to protect victims. The media's complicity in suppressing stories related to powerful individuals involved in trafficking is alarming. The conversation calls for moral courage to demand justice for the victims of trafficking. Sound Bites "The royals can be pretty litigious." "Justice delayed is justice denied." "The victims are waiting for justice." Chapters 00:00 Understanding Human Trafficking in America 02:21 The Scale and Nature of Trafficking 05:22 The Role of Technology in Trafficking 07:19 The Epstein Connection: Banking and Trafficking 09:57 Systemic Issues in Justice and Accountability 12:50 Confronting the Trafficking Crisis 14:19 The Disappearance of America's Children 26:26 Ghislaine Maxwell's Testimony and Deception 41:08 The Fixer's Confession and Broader Implications 41:38 Trump, Cohen, and the Epstein Connection 45:59 Prince Andrew: The Royal Scandal 51:43 The Global Intelligence Blackmail Network 56:28 Systematic Exploitation and Cover-Up 01:02:45 The Reckoning and Demand for Justice

Tom the producer offers a disgusted pontification on the growing interest in conspiracy theories and what's driving people's engagement with controversial topics. He discusses the shift in public perception regarding narratives presented by traditional media, particularly in the context of significant events like 9/11 and the COVID-19 pandemic. Tom emphasizes the importance of questioning established narratives and the implications of information control on societal awareness.takeawaysPeople are increasingly questioning mainstream narratives.The term 'conspiracy theory' was created to discredit dissenting voices.Significant events often have hidden narratives that require deeper investigation.Public interest in controversial topics is rising due to perceived misinformation.The definition of vaccine has changed, raising concerns about public health messaging.Many individuals are beginning to connect the dots between various societal issues.The impact of COVID-19 has led to a reevaluation of trust in institutions.Conversations about sensitive topics are becoming more common.The relationship between power structures and societal issues is complex and often obscured.Awareness of historical context is crucial in understanding current events.titlesUnpacking the Conspiracy CultureWhy Are We Questioning Everything?Sound Bites"What keeps you listening to this series?" "Natural immunity was called racist." "Once you've thought, 'what's going on?' ...you'll never be able to sit through "The View" again"

This is getting uncomfortable. Tom The Producer taps a call with attorney Meg McCormick Horner, discussing various topics including the Epstein case, 9/11, and upcoming coverage. Full Epstein Coverage: https://youtu.be/q6L6w3rKCPs?si=_UhZpw5w3Hi-jNAb The episode delves into conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11, the implications of Epstein's legal troubles, and the challenges of content creation in today's digital landscape.takeawaysThis episode was unplanned and spontaneous.The conversation shifted to 9/11 facts and theories.There are many unanswered questions about 9/11.The #Epstein case has many legal implications.Content creation is becoming increasingly challenging.YouTube has strict content guidelines.There is potential for high viewership on Epstein-related topics.

Tom the producer continues to find appalling information on Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on recent developments, including the Las Vegas arrest of Tom Alexandrovich, a high-ranking Israeli cybersecurity official, for pred@tory behavior towards m!nors. The discussion highlights patterns of individuals fleeing to Israel to evade justice, the implications of Israeli citizenship laws, and the intersection of intelligence agencies and legal loopholes that allow such behavior to persist. The conversation concludes with reflections on the potential future of the case and the broader implications for #justice .takeawaysThe Epstein scandal continues to reveal new layers of pred@tory behavior.Recent arrests highlight a troubling pattern of evasion of justice.Israeli citizenship laws are exploited by fugitives to avoid prosecution.Tom Alexandrovich's case exemplifies the ongoing issues within the justice system.There are numerous cases of p3dophiles returning to Israel and reoffending.The law of return grants instant citizenship, complicating extradition efforts.Epstein's own flight to Israel post-conviction raises serious questions.Intelligence agencies may be aware of these individuals yet take no action.The comfort level of offenders in the U.S. is alarming given their backgrounds.The conversation underscores the need for systemic change in handling such cases.Sound Bites"This is a bit of a pattern.""Israel lets p3dophiles come back.""The hubris is #ucking excruciating."

In this conversation, David Helmer, founder of NTTW Consulting, discusses the complexities and implications of artificial intelligence (AI) with host Louis Casadia. They explore the definitions of AI, its evolution, the differences between traditional search engines and modern AI, and the potential dangers associated with AI objectives. The discussion also delves into the legal ramifications of deepfakes, the challenges of misinformation on social media, and the future of AI consciousness. Helmer emphasizes the importance of understanding AI as a software product and the need for accountability in its use.takeawaysAI lacks a universally accepted definition, leading to confusion.Most discussions about AI today focus on #machinelearning .AI's capabilities have evolved significantly over the years.Deepfakes pose serious risks in criminal #law and personal privacy.The legal system is not yet prepared for #deepfake evidence.Misinformation on social media is exacerbated by AI-generated content.Regulation of AI is complex and varies by jurisdiction.AI does not possess consciousness or agency like humans do.Accountability for AI's actions lies with its developers and users.The future of AI will continue to raise ethical and legal questions.Sound Bites"The law is still the law.""AI is just fancy math.""Ask them to define AI."South Jersey Criminal Defense Lawyer: https://LaceLaw.com Interested in podcasting?Visit: https://LegalPodcasting.com or https://NJCriminalPodcast.com

Christian Barth, an author and attorney, discusses his journey in writing true crime, particularly focusing on the Garden State Parkway Murders. He shares updates on his research, the challenges he faces in accessing information, and his transition from non-fiction to fiction writing. Barth emphasizes the importance of good facts in storytelling and reflects on the intersection of law and creative writing. The discussion also touches on the role of AI in writing, the differences between fiction and non-fiction, and the need for transparency in criminal investigations.takeawaysChristian Barth has been researching the Garden State Parkway Murders for years.DNA technology continues to evolve and is crucial in cold cases.Barth believes that fiction can help generate new leads in unsolved cases.Access to public records is often denied, hindering investigations.The creative process in writing requires dedication and time management.Barth's writing is influenced by his legal background and research skills.He finds inspiration in historical contexts and personal connections to cases.AI may change writing, but readers still value human authorship.Transparency in law enforcement is essential for solving cold cases.Barth encourages public engagement in sharing information about unsolved crimes.Sound Bites"I believe fiction can assist in solving cases.""You need good facts to do a story justice.""The law needs to be changed for transparency."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Christian Barth and His Work02:01 Updates on the Garden State Parkway Murders05:43 Transitioning from Non-Fiction to Fiction09:13 The Research Process and Challenges13:12 The Intersection of Law and Creative Writing17:12 Writing Process and Inspirations21:16 The Role of AI in Writing25:13 Fiction vs. Non-Fiction Writing29:08 The Future of True Crime and Transparency in Investigations33:04 Conclusion and Call to Action