Advertise on podcast: True to the Bible

Hunter Davis gives an overview of Habakkuk, an often-overlooked Old Testament book set during a troubled period in Judah’s history. He explores the prophet’s honest questions: Why does God allow wickedness to flourish, and why would He use Babylon—a nation even more wicked—to judge Judah? The episode follows Habakkuk’s conversation with God, highlighting the promise that “the righteous will live by faith” and the assurance that God remains sovereign and will ultimately bring justice. It concludes with Habakkuk’s prayer in chapter 3, where he remembers God’s past faithfulness and chooses to rejoice in the Lord despite the hardship ahead. A concise introduction to Habakkuk’s themes of evil, justice, faith, and finding joy and steadiness in God when circumstances are bleak.

Limited atonement is the first point many Calvinists drop—and for good reason: once you start reading the text closely, the arguments can be hard to defend. Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack tackle the “L” in TULIP, asking whether Jesus died only for the elect, why John Calvin himself may not fit modern Calvinism, and what the Bible says about Christ’s payment for sin. They unpack the theology behind limited atonement and examine assumptions that often come with it—such as confusing payment with forgiveness, or interpreting “all” to mean only “all types” or “all the elect.” Along the way, they discuss appropriation, propitiation, and the difference between Jesus paying for sin and that payment being applied to a person. The conversation explores passages including 1 Timothy 2, Hebrews 2:9, Isaiah 53:6, 1 John 2:2, and 2 Peter 2:1. Hunter and Brent consider how these verses relate to limited atonement, including the language of Christ as the propitiation for “the whole world” and the “Master who bought” false teachers. If you’ve wondered why four-point Calvinism exists, why limited atonement is often the first point people drop, or how the modern doctrine compares with Calvin’s own words, this episode offers a Bible-focused discussion of one of the most debated points in Calvinism. The conversation closes with a reminder to look to Scripture rather than a theological system—and to share the message that Jesus loves people, died for them, and offers eternal life to those who believe.

Romans 9 through 11 changes completely once you stop assuming election always means eternal salvation. Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack tackle one of Calvinism’s most debated points, **unconditional election**, and make the case that Paul is talking about **service, corporate calling, and God’s use of nations**, not simply who gets saved. The conversation starts with the hard questions behind Romans 9—Jacob and Esau, Pharaoh, mercy, compassion, and the potter and the clay. But instead of reading those passages as proof that God arbitrarily chooses individuals for heaven or hell, Hunter and Brent trace the same imagery back to **Jeremiah 18**, where the clay is spoiled and remade. That shift opens up a bigger idea: God can use human failure, rebellion, and even rejection to accomplish His purposes. You’ll hear them break down: - Why unconditional election is not the same as merit-based salvation - The difference between **individual election** and **corporate election** - How Israel was elected for **service, witness, and a set-apart purpose** - Why the “wild olive branch” in Romans 11 points to Gentiles being grafted in - What it means to be cut off or grafted in without turning the passage into a salvation-by-works warning Hunter and Brent also push back on replacement theology and revisit the remnant of Israel, the church age, and the mystery of Jews and Gentiles forming one body in Christ. Along the way, they raise a fascinating question: if God can take a spoiled vessel and still make something beautiful, what does that say about how He works through history, disobedience, and even judgment? If you’ve wrestled with Romans 9 to 11, the language of election, or the tension between God’s sovereignty and human responsibility, this episode offers a fresh framework for thinking through these passages.

Three End Times Views Explained in Under 10 Minutes What are the main differences between premillennialism, postmillennialism, and amillennialism? In this episode of *True to the Bible Podcast*, Hunter Davidson offers a quick overview of the three views and how each interprets the thousand-year reign, biblical prophecy, and the events surrounding Jesus’ return. The episode compares the more literal approach of premillennial dispensationalism with the more symbolic interpretations of postmillennialism and amillennialism. Hunter explains how the views differ on whether the world will grow better or worse before Jesus returns, and how they understand the tribulation, the rapture, Israel, and the 70 weeks of Daniel. If end-times passages in Daniel, Ezekiel, or Revelation have felt confusing, this episode offers a concise starting point for understanding the different perspectives.

Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack continue their series on Calvinism by examining unconditional election through Ephesians 1 and Romans 9. They ask who is being chosen, what they are chosen for, and whether these passages refer to individuals or to a people as a whole. In their reading of Ephesians, the hosts argue that “us” refers to the church in Christ—a community of Jewish and Gentile believers chosen for a shared purpose. They emphasize that the passage describes this group as called to be holy, adopted through Jesus, and a witness to God’s glory. They point to verse 13, where people hear the gospel and believe, as part of the discussion about how someone becomes part of that group. Turning to Romans 9, Hunter and Brent consider Jacob and Esau, Pharaoh, and the potter-and-clay imagery. They suggest these passages are best understood in the wider context of God’s purposes for peoples and nations, including Israel and the Gentiles, rather than as a straightforward account of individuals being chosen for heaven or hell. They also discuss how God can accomplish his purposes through human decisions without needing to force every choice. The conversation offers a thoughtful, scripture-focused framework for considering election, predestination, God’s sovereignty, and human responsibility. The hosts close by previewing a continuation of the discussion in Romans 11.

Unconditional election is not as simple as “God chooses some people for heaven and others for hell.” Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack break down the Calvinist doctrine of election by asking the questions most Christians never slow down long enough to ask: who is being chosen, chosen by whom, and chosen for what? If you’ve ever heard election taught as a blanket statement about salvation, this conversation will challenge that assumption. Hunter and Brent unpack why many passages are read as if they are automatically about eternal life, when the Bible often uses election language for something different—service, calling, corporate identity, and God’s purposes for a people rather than only an individual. **In this episode, you’ll discover:** - Why corporate election matters and how individualistic Bible reading can distort interpretation   - The difference between Israel being chosen as a people and individuals being chosen for salvation   - Why Judah, Aaron, Levi, Saul, Judas, Paul, and others illustrate election to service   - How passages in Deuteronomy, Ephesians, John, and other books should be understood in context   - Why “elect” and “chosen” do not always mean “predestined to eternal life”   - How unconditional election connects to questions about free will, responsibility, and human choice   Brent walks through key Old Testament examples, including Israel in Deuteronomy 7 and the corporate language of Ephesians 2, showing how God chooses groups to represent Him, serve Him, and carry out His purposes. Hunter pushes the conversation further by asking how Calvinist theology affects motivation, virtue, obedience, and personal responsibility. What happens if a person’s eternal destiny is fixed in a way they cannot influence? What do Jesus’ invitations and warnings mean if people are unable to respond? And how should believers understand God’s sovereignty without reducing people to puppets? If you want a thoughtful, biblical way to examine election, predestination, free will, and Calvinism, this episode is an important place to begin. In the next episode, the conversation continues with a closer look at Ephesians 1, Romans 9, and Romans 11.

Total Depravity: What Does Calvinism Actually Mean Total depravity is one of the most misunderstood parts of Calvinism—and this conversation shows why. Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack unpack what the doctrine actually claims, where many Christians unknowingly agree with only part of it, and why the real issue is not whether sin affects every part of us, but whether a person can respond to God before regeneration. For listeners trying to make sense of TULIP, this episode cuts through the confusion. Hunter and Brent examine the common assumption that spiritual deadness means total incapacity, then explore the passages Calvinists often use to defend the doctrine—including Romans 1, Ephesians 2, Romans 8, John 6, 1 Corinthians 2, and more. **In this episode, you’ll discover:** - Why faith is not the same thing as works in Romans 4   - How Romans 1 and Psalm 19 frame God’s first move   - Why Ephesians 2 may not prove what Calvinism says it proves   - What John 12 adds to the drawing language in John 6   - How 1 Corinthians 2 makes more sense when read in context   - Whether regeneration precedes faith—or faith precedes eternal life   Brent Bolerjack brings a clear theological defense of the non-Calvinist reading, while Hunter Davis pushes the conversation toward the practical question underneath it all: if God is drawing, convicting, and revealing Himself, what exactly is humanity unable to do—and what are people still able to do in response? If you’ve ever heard “total depravity” used as shorthand for “man cannot respond to God at all,” this episode will sharpen your understanding and encourage you to reexamine the scriptures for yourself.

When suffering hits, the question is not just “Will God be glorified?” but “Does His love still meet me here?” Hunter Davis and Jacquelyn Davis explore a tension many believers quietly wrestle with: the difference between God’s glory and God’s love, and why getting that balance wrong can be especially painful in the middle of a trial. Jacquelyn brings a deeply personal perspective shaped by years in ministry, missionary work, burnout, and member care. She opens up about what it felt like to pour her life into serving God, then face depression, identity loss, and the difficult question: If God is glorified no matter what, what is my life actually for? Together, Hunter and Jacquelyn unpack: - Why John 3:16 and Philippians 2 matter when considering what motivated Christ - How Isaiah 43 holds God’s glory and love together - Why “God will be glorified” is true, but may not always be the most helpful first response to someone who is suffering - What Scripture teaches about trials developing perseverance, maturity, and peace - How Joseph’s story shows God’s power to redeem evil without being the author of it This episode offers a thoughtful, pastoral way to understand suffering—one that protects God’s holiness without portraying Him as distant or uncaring. Hunter and Jacquelyn remind hurting people that they are not merely pieces in a cosmic plan, but individuals invited into a real relationship with a loving Father. Whether you are walking through pain, counseling someone who is, or trying to understand how God’s glory, human choice, suffering, and redemption fit together, this conversation offers encouragement and hope. Healing is not linear, but the God who redeems is still at work.

## **EPISODE DESCRIPTION - Ready to publish** Calvinism raises a question that changes everything: if God is sovereign, does that mean He authors every choice, every sin, and every outcome? Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack push into that tension and make the case that God's sovereignty is bigger than control, and far more hopeful than a system that leaves believers guessing. Using Genesis 50:20, Joseph, Pharaoh, Saul, and the warning passages in Hebrews, Hunter and Brent unpack where they believe Calvinism goes too far - especially when it turns warnings meant for believers into tests of whether someone was ever truly saved. Along the way, they challenge the idea that salvation can be measured by enough fruit, enough consistency, or enough visible proof. You'll discover why they think Calvinism can backload the gospel with works, blur the line between salvation and discipleship, and create a cycle of doubt that keeps believers rechecking their status instead of resting in Christ. They also dig into church discipline, persistent sin, and why some theology can quietly push struggling Christians toward fear instead of restoration. Hunter and Brent also tackle the bigger implications: can this framework unintentionally give people license to sin, make them question God's goodness, or leave them unsure whether His love is really for everyone? Those are the stakes of the conversation, and they matter if you've ever wrestled with assurance, election, warning passages, or what it actually means to be saved. If you want a serious, scripture-driven critique of Calvinism that stays focused on the text and the practical consequences for real believers, this episode will sharpen your thinking and give you fresh language for one of the most contested debates in Christianity.

# **EPISODE DESCRIPTION - Ready to publish** A fresh series on Calvinism kicks off with a blunt, Bible-first question: what do the five points actually mean, and what happens when people build a whole theology on assumptions about election, free will, and grace? Hunter Davis and Brent Bolerjack pull apart TULIP from the ground up and ask whether the system really holds together - or whether it creates bigger problems than it solves. Hunter and Brent are not coming at this as Calvinists. That makes the conversation sharper, more honest, and more useful for anyone who has heard the terms tossed around but never really sorted out what they mean. Brent lays out each point of TULIP - total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints - while Hunter pushes on the history, the definitions, and the practical impact on evangelism, assurance, and the character of God. You’ll discover: - Why election, not depravity, may be the real crux of the Calvinism debate - How the history of Calvinism, Arminius, and the Council of Dort complicates the simple five-point summary most people know - Why “dead in trespasses and sins” is at the center of the argument over whether humans can respond to the gospel - The tension between God’s desire for all to be saved and the deterministic logic of Calvinism - Why limited atonement and irresistible grace are often the hardest points to defend biblically Brent also breaks down the practical pitfalls he sees in Calvinism - from shifting blame away from human responsibility to turning salvation assurance inward, where believers start measuring themselves against an invisible standard of perseverance instead of resting in Christ. Hunter adds a strong warning about how definitions get distorted when Bible words like “saved” and “elect” are pulled out of context and reinserted with a predetermined meaning. This is not a detached theology lecture. It’s a real conversation about how doctrine shapes the way you read Scripture, how you talk to lost people, and how you think about God Himself. If Calvinism has ever confused you, frustrated you, or become something you hear discussed without fully understanding, this episode gives you a clear starting point. Essential listening for anyone who wants to think carefully about the five points, test them against Scripture, and understand why this series matters before the deeper debate begins.

The biggest shift in the Bible is not just salvation - it's access.** Hunter Davis shows how the Old Testament repeatedly warns people away from God, then contrasts that with the astonishing invitation believers have now through Christ: draw near, come boldly, and live with real closeness to God. From Eden to Mount Sinai to the Holy of Holies, Hunter traces the biblical pattern of separation caused by sin. He explains why Adam and Eve were driven from the garden, why even animals could not touch Sinai, why the high priest entered the veil only once a year, and why Uzzah died after reaching for the ark. Each moment builds the same case: God is holy, sin separates, and no one could casually approach Him. You will discover: - Why "access to God" is a different idea from salvation, and why that distinction matters - How the veil, the tabernacle, and the Holy of Holies reveal the seriousness of God's holiness - What changed when Jesus died and the temple veil was torn from top to bottom - Why Hebrews, James, and Mark together show a new reality for believers - How the Holy Spirit, prayer, sanctification, and daily Christian life fit into this new access Hunter also makes the practical case for why this matters now. Believers are not just saved for eternity - they are invited into nearness today. That means prayer, repentance, wisdom, parenting, marriage, and spiritual growth are all meant to happen with a real awareness of God's presence, not as religious routine but as privilege. If you have ever taken your relationship with God for granted, this episode is a needed reset. Essential listening for Christians who want to understand what Christ truly opened for them - and why drawing near is now the whole point.

Jesus meets grief with both truth and compassion, showing that God’s timing is not ours and his power is greater than our expectations.

In this lesson we see Jesus telling the disciples of what they will do once He is gone. In this sad time we see some great and comforting news, do you know what it is? Find out in todays TTB Podcast.

In this lesson we see some bad news, as well as some good news that the disciples receive from Jesus. What is this news and how does it effect us as believers today? We will find this out and more in todays TTB podcast.

In this lesson in John 13 we see Jesus give a new command, but what was the old command? What does this command mean? We will answer these questions and more in todays lesson.