Advertise on podcast: Mere Mortals Book Reviews

Nothing like a little anthropology to conjure up some new ideas. In this episode, I unpacked 'Debt: The First 5,000 Years' by David Graeber and explored why this book grabbed me despite a few early red flags. From the outset, Graeber challenges the standard story that barter came first and money naturally evolved from it. Instead, he argues that credit and debt were the original foundations of exchange, with coinage arriving much later and often tied to violence, taxation and the needs of states and armies. I walked through how that idea reframes the way we think about money: not as a timeless necessity in every context, but as one tool among many that humans have used depending on trust, scale and social relationships. I also dug into the book’s broader and more provocative themes, including slavery, religion, moral obligation, capitalism and the strange relationship between debt and power. What I appreciated most was how Graeber opened up entirely different ways of thinking, even when the book became messy, overly theoretical or wandered off on tangents. I came away with more questions than answers, particularly around whether money is always needed, how trust-based systems work, and what all this might mean for a more digital future. My overall take: a creative, mind-expanding read that’s full of fascinating ideas, even if it’s not always tightly argued or easy to summarise. I gave it a 6.5/10.  If you got value from the podcast please provide support back in any way you best see fit! Timeline:  (00:00:00) Intro (00:00:30) Opening thoughts and book overview (00:03:54) Why Adam Smith's barter story is challenged (00:09:40) Tallies, trust and the origins of debt (00:12:07) Coinage, violence and taxation (00:14:20) Slavery, religion and the morality of debt (00:16:24) When money works and when trust works better (00:20:54) Key quotes and the book's biggest ideas (00:30:20) David Graeber, activism and writing style (00:34:24) Debt jubilees and practical takeaways (00:36:15) Final verdict, rating and recommendations (00:41:44) Closing remarks and what is next  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

A Storm of Swords Part 1 had me questioning a character I thought I'd made my mind up about and reading chapter after chapter when I should have put it down. In this spoiler-light review of Steel and Snow by George R.R. Martin, I explain why the first part of A Song of Ice and Fire's third novel exceeded my expectations after A Game of Thrones and A Clash of Kings. New points of view change how you see the world, the action steps up, and the groundwork from the earlier books starts paying off. I cover the pacing, character writing, fight scenes and why I recommend reading the first two books before this one. This review covers Part 1: Steel and Snow only. I avoid the major plot reveals, although I mention new viewpoint characters and give a small hint about an incident. CHAPTERS 00:00 Why readers told me to expect more 00:59 The viewpoints I wanted to see 01:55 New perspectives changed my mind 03:15 The action steps up 03:51 Why I couldn't put it down 04:30 Why you need the first two books 05:26 Characters that still feel like themselves 06:15 A request for The Winds of Winter 06:30 My verdict on Steel and Snow 07:20 Why the fight scenes stand out 07:56 What should I expect from Part 2? Without spoilers: does Part 2 raise the bar again, or should I temper my expectations? Let me know below. Subscribe to Mere Mortals Book Reviews for more honest reading reactions, fantasy reviews and the next steps in my A Song of Ice and Fire read-through. Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

1984 is my favourite book of all time. However, it's certainly not fun to read. Orwell's style is rather dry & aside from 'Animal Farm' or 'Homage To Catalonia' most of his other works are so bleak as to be uninspiring. I don't believe the fictional world of 1984 is likely to occur & wouldn't be sustainable even if willed into existence. Despite this it has shaped my worldview more than anything else. Little lessons that add up to how I think, what I believe, who I am, the way I live & act/behave. Below is a selection of quotes & what they have taught me: "Nothing in the world was so bad as physical pain. In the face of pain there are no heroes." - It's ok to dislike pain, yet there will be suffering. Figure out what is avoidable & unavoidable. Examine your suffering & you'll find out most is crafted by your thoughts, not pain. “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.” - This is a skill developed by the party, showcased by O'Brien & has a negative connotation. Yet life is inherently paradoxical, one cannot outthink a paradox. Lean into them & develop a humour of the absurd. “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” - You get to decide your destiny. Your interpretation of reality will affect your life quality much more than the actual nature of 'objective' reality. “There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.” - Take heart if you desire the truth, it can be alienating & cruel to realise. This courage also needs to be tempered with proof that you are actually correct. "Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood" - Love is the most semantically overloaded word in English. To be loved can mean anything. To be understood you must know yourself to your deepest core & then someone else must know you to an equal level. Eth Tx: 0x8f8448b51dc60a82ba377203d0feeebe23279d08047b2e3daa206903cdf0ad62 If you got value from the podcast please provide support back in any way you best see fit! Timeline:  (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:40) Favourite quotes and the lessons behind them (00:03:46) What has changed since his earlier 1984 reviews (00:06:39) A brilliant book, but not an enjoyable read (00:11:45) Physical pain, suffering, and grief (00:14:57) Doublethink, paradox, and living with contradiction (00:19:03) Truth, reality, and rewriting the past (00:25:41) Love versus being truly understood (00:34:20) Why 1984 endures and a blockchain experiment (00:38:00) Final recommendation and closing reflections  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

Average advice will get you average returns. In this episode, I review 'Big Mistakes' by Michael Batnick, a short investing book that profiles famous investors and the bad calls that shaped their careers. I run through the book’s structure, some of the names featured — including Benjamin Graham, Jesse Livermore, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger — and why I found the core premise more interesting than the execution. While the book tries to distil each investor’s major error into a neat lesson, I came away feeling that many of those conclusions were either too vague or too forced to be genuinely useful. My main takeaway is that this one lands as fairly average advice dressed up with great source material. I dig into why I wasn’t convinced by some of Batnick’s interpretations, especially around whether he properly identified what these investors actually got wrong, and why I’d generally recommend going back to the original books and histories instead. Overall, this was a disappointing read for me and one I couldn’t strongly recommend, finishing with a low rating and a reminder that sometimes the summaries are far less valuable than the source itself.  If you got value from the podcast please provide support back in any way you best see fit! Timeline: (00:00:00) Intro (00:02:14) How the book structures investor mistakes (00:03:01) Why the lessons feel vague and inconsistent (00:07:55) Critique of Michael Batnick as the guide (00:13:14) Final verdict and better investing approach (00:17:02) Next reading plans and closing remarks  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

Would you rather evolve into an Eloi or a Morlock? In this episode, I dive into H.G. Wells ’The Time Machine', a short but hugely influential classic that may be one of the earliest stories to imagine time travel as a machine-driven journey into the future. I walk through the novel’s framing device, the Time Traveller’s unsettling visit to roughly 800,000 AD, and the split future of humanity into the carefree Eloi and the subterranean Morlocks. From there, I unpack why the book still holds up: its eerie vision of evolution, class division, and social decay, plus the way Wells blends scientific curiosity with imaginative speculation to create a compelling early sci-fi adventure. I also share what stood out to me most as a reader: the novel’s clever structure, its surprisingly gritty tone, and Wells’ deeply pessimistic view of humanity’s future. While I don’t rate it as an all-time personal favourite, I do think it’s well worth reading if you’re interested in the roots of science fiction, time travel stories, or how late-19th-century anxieties about class, progress and civilisation found their way into fiction. It’s a quick read, historically important, and full of ideas that still feel worth discussing today.  If you got value from the podcast please provide support back in any way you best see fit! Timeline: (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:15) The Time Traveller sets off and reaches the far future (00:02:44) Eloi paradise and the horror of the Morlocks (00:04:49) Social themes and evolution gone backwards (00:08:30) Science fiction ideas and suspended disbelief (00:11:47) Narrative structure and standout moments (00:14:01) H G Wells and his bleak view of humanity (00:17:23) Final verdict and why the book still matters (00:19:18) Comparisons, Weena and the book's darker edge (00:21:59) What I am reading next  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

A bigger world. More perspectives. Nearly 900 pages. But is A Clash of Kings actually better than A Game of Thrones? In this Mere Mortals book review, I share my honest thoughts on George R. R. Martin’s second A Song of Ice and Fire novel—as someone reading the books without having watched the television series. I enjoyed the journey, particularly Tyrion’s chapters, Arya’s perspective and Martin’s immersive writing. But the slower build, scattered storylines and unresolved threads left me missing some of the first book’s intensity. 00:00 Is bigger actually better? 00:15 A Clash of Kings: the setup 01:59 My verdict versus A Game of Thrones 04:07 A bigger world, more unfinished stories 06:44 Tyrion shines—but where is Robb? 08:04 Pacing and the Battle of the Blackwater 09:05 Arya, food and immersive detail 10:15 Was it worth the read? 11:09 Your thoughts—and what comes next Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcast.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/jjfq9eGReU Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcast  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

Sure is a lot of hanky panky going on in a sexually repressive time. In this episode, I review John Steinbeck’s The Wayward Bus, a 1947 novel that sits somewhere in his middle period and while not usually counted among his greatest literary achievements is clearly packed with the sort of vivid, messy human character work he does so well. I walk through the book’s loose premise — a stranded bus, a roadside station, and a cast of passengers and workers thrown together — and talk about why the story feels less like a tightly structured plot and more like a vehicle for Steinbeck to explore personality, motive and tension. For me, that’s where the novel really shines: not in grand narrative payoff, but in the way Steinbeck builds believable people and lets their inner thoughts drive their actions. I also dig into what I saw as one of the book’s strongest undercurrents: the sexual tension running through nearly every interaction. Set in a more outwardly modest post-WWII, the novel still reveals how little human nature really changes beneath the surface. I reflect on the ways desire, jealousy, insecurity and attraction shape the characters and how Steinbeck captures those dynamics with an honesty that still feels recognisable today. My overall take: The Wayward Bus is a solid, casual Steinbeck read — not on the level of East of Eden or The Grapes of Wrath, but still an enjoyable novel if you love sharp character observation. I gave it a 6.5/10. If you got value from the podcast please provide support back in any way you best see fit! Timeline: (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:20) The Wayward Bus synopsis and cast of characters (00:04:13) Steinbeck's loose storytelling and postwar setting (00:06:45) Camille, desire and repression on the bus (00:09:58) Can men and women be just friends (00:12:33) Why human nature has not changed much (00:15:15) A real life example of social and sexual tension (00:17:29) Final verdict and where this book fits in Steinbeck (00:19:42) What Kyrin is reading and episode wrap up  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

My first Franz Kafka read was weird, vivid and surprisingly enjoyable. In this Mere Mortals Book Review, I share my thoughts on Metamorphosis and the other short stories in this Penguin collection. From Gregor Samsa’s transformation to a tense taxi dispute and an unexpected insight about achievement, Kafka packs strange situations, precise details and memorable ideas into remarkably short stories. I discuss alienation, family dependence, Kafka’s writing style, and why reading at a conversational pace helped me enjoy this collection. ⚠️ Spoilers: the Metamorphosis plot discussion starts at 07:39 and includes the ending. Skip to 09:59 to avoid it. CHAPTERS 00:00 My first encounter with Kafka 00:30 Kafka’s background and literary legacy 01:55 What’s in this short-story collection? 03:03 Kafka’s style and finding my reading pace 04:29 Tiny details that make the writing vivid 05:58 A short reading and everyday observations 07:39 Metamorphosis plot and themes — spoilers 09:59 Point of view and writing outside a day job 11:05 The Aeroplanes at Brescia: the taxi dispute 13:07 The biplane and perfect achievement 14:30 Final thoughts: would I recommend Kafka? Have you read Kafka? What did Gregor’s transformation mean to you—and which Kafka book should I read next? Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

The best way to understand apathy is to not understand at all. In this episode, I’m back with a review of Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood, the 1966 classic that helped define the true crime genre. I unpack the book’s retelling of the brutal Clutter family murders in Kansas, the psychology of Perry Smith and Richard Hickock and Capote’s readable, gripping style. While I can appreciate the book’s historical importance, strong reporting and the way it gives readers close access to the killers, I kept coming back to the same question: why? For me, the most unsettling part was that there doesn’t seem to be any satisfying meaning behind the crime beyond damaged people committing senseless violence. I also reflect on why true crime generally doesn’t work for me, despite how popular it is. Reading this didn’t leave me feeling wiser or more understanding of the world — it mostly left me feeling sad. I touch on the ethical questions around capital punishment, the lack of redemption in the story and why meaningless suffering makes this such a heavy read. My final take: it’s an important and well-written book for those interested in true crime, but personally it wasn’t for me and I land at roughly a 2.5 out of 10.  If you got value from the podcast please provide support back in any way you best see fit! Timeline: (00:00:00) Intro (00:01:01) What In Cold Blood is about (00:02:19) The killers and the senseless motive (00:07:05) Why true crime leaves him cold (00:09:54) Truman Capote and the book's reporting style (00:11:52) Capital punishment and moral questions (00:15:42) Final verdict and whether it is worth reading (00:18:13) What is next for the book reviews  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

Can a book about stupidity leave you feeling stupider? The Psychology of Stupidity, edited by Jean-François Marmion, promises explanations from some of the world's smartest people. I finished it wondering how it became a bestseller. In this Mere Mortals Book Review, I explain why the collection disappointed me: repetitive discussions of terminology, arguments I found one-sided, and interviews that didn't deliver the depth I was hoping for. I also discuss the handful of ideas I did find interesting, before looking more closely at the book's treatment of artificial intelligence, meat-eating and intelligence, and its conversation with Daniel Kahneman. These are my reactions to the book and the way its arguments are presented. If you enjoyed it, I'd love to hear what worked for you. CHAPTERS 00:00 The book and its big promise 00:21 Red flags—and my dad's warning 01:01 What I hoped to learn 01:41 The “world's smartest people” pitch 02:37 How the collection is structured 03:06 My verdict—and the few bright spots 04:09 Repetition instead of insight 05:30 The artificial intelligence argument 08:19 Meat-eating, intelligence and missing balance 10:30 The interviews I wanted more from 11:47 What did I actually learn? 12:23 Would I recommend it? BOOK The Psychology of Stupidity Edited by Jean-François Marmion Subscribe to Mere Mortals Book Reviews for more honest reviews, practical ideas and conversations about the books we read. Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcast.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/jjfq9eGReU Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcast  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

Can uncertainty make you stronger and does Antifragile actually show you how? In this Mere Mortals Book Review, Juan explores Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. There are powerful ideas here, but I finished the book with mixed feelings about its practical application, repetition and relentless personal attacks. I unpack the difference between fragile, robust and antifragile, explore the barbell strategy and question how easily these frameworks translate into everyday life. My biggest takeaway? Via negativa: improving by removing harmful habits and unnecessary complexity. Sometimes progress comes from subtraction. We also explore why a system can benefit from failures that hurt its individual members, my pushback on Taleb’s views about technology, and the ethics of becoming stronger at someone else’s expense. Glad I read it, but would I recommend reading every page? CHAPTERS 00:00 Introducing Antifragile and Taleb 01:30 Why I picked it up 02:08 Structure, maths and optional chapters 03:23 Fragile vs robust vs antifragile 04:51 The limits of antifragility 06:25 The Hydra, aviation and individual sacrifice 08:58 Longevity and Taleb’s confrontational style 10:45 Where I push back on health and nature 12:00 The barbell strategy: can you apply it? 13:49 Convexity, concavity and practical usefulness 16:06 Via negativa: improvement through subtraction 17:04 The Lindy effect, technology and AI 18:34 Too long, too repetitive, too many attacks? 19:43 The ethics of shifting risk onto others 20:51 My verdict: should you read it? 21:40 What I’ll apply to my own life What’s one thing you could REMOVE from your life to make it better? Let me know in the comments. Subscribe to Mere Mortals Book Reviews for honest reflections on books, big ideas and their place in everyday life. Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcast.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/jjfq9eGReU Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcast Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

Can we slow AI development down while everyone is still trying to win the race? In this episode of Mere Mortals Book Reviews, I'm reviewing an article: “We Must Pace the Frontier” by Dario Amodei. I unpack the proposals for embedded evaluators, coordination between AI companies and international cooperation. Then I share where I'm supportive, where I'm sceptical, and why reading Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s Antifragile has me questioning the comparison between AI safety and aviation. We also explore recursive self-improvement, the tension between global cooperation and US–China competition, and whether today's AI capabilities already give us enough to work with. This is my personal reading and critique of the article. Read it yourself and tell me where you agree or disagree. READ THE ARTICLE https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier CHAPTERS 00:00 An article review with big implications 00:32 The controversy behind the conversation 02:25 What does “pacing the frontier” mean? 03:36 Embedded evaluators: independent eyes inside AI labs 05:29 Antifragile, aviation and learning from failure 07:23 Recursive self-improvement and company coordination 09:18 Global cooperation meets US–China competition 11:32 Different levels of AI pacing 12:17 My verdict: slow down, pause or keep going? Should AI companies slow down, pause completely or keep pushing forward? What would change your mind? Subscribe to Mere Mortals Book Reviews for more reflections on books, articles and the ideas they leave us wrestling with. Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcast.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/jjfq9eGReU Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcast  Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

I never watched Game of Thrones. Then I finally picked up George R. R. Martin's A Game of Thrones and I get it now. I went into the first book of A Song of Ice and Fire with almost no connection to the TV series. In fact, years ago I made it about four minutes into episode one before turning it off. The book was a very different story. It starts slowly enough, building the people, families, politics and world but somewhere around the first third it starts accelerating. By the final few hundred pages I was absolutely smashing through chapters just trying to find out what happened next. In this review I get into: Why George R. R. Martin's POV structure works so well How he manages to interweave so many characters and storylines Why the world somehow feels enormous while remaining grounded The comparison with The Lord of the Rings The brutality, darkness and unpredictability of the story Why the final third completely hooked me The slightly uncomfortable reality of starting an unfinished series Whether you should read the book if you've already watched the show My rating: 9/10. 00:00 I finally read A Game of Thrones 01:02 Going in without watching the TV series 03:09 The problem with starting an unfinished series 05:11 Bigger than The Lord of the Rings? 06:19 Why the POV structure works so well 08:15 When the book hits overdrive 10:47 The dialogue, brutality & darkness 11:51 Why the fantasy still feels grounded 13:46 My final thoughts 14:47 Should you read A Game of Thrones? Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

I read The Book of Elon by Eric Jorgenson, a collection of Elon Musk’s most useful ideas on purpose, engineering, business, hiring, intensity and problem-solving, presented largely through Musk’s own words. Rather than another Elon Musk biography, this book attempts to distil his operating system: how he thinks, why he works with such extreme intensity and which principles have shaped companies including Tesla and SpaceX. But does it offer anything genuinely new? 00:00 What is The Book of Elon? 00:28 How I received the book 01:03 This is not an Elon Musk biography 01:48 Three million words distilled 02:24 More than 1,000 source references 03:10 The 69 Core Musk Methods 03:35 How the book is designed 03:56 My background with Elon Musk 04:42 Why so much of it felt familiar 05:45 Is it useful as a reference book? 06:35 Why I probably wouldn’t reread it 07:19 Who should read this book? 07:55 Elon’s “ultra hardcore” philosophy 08:24 Success because of—or despite—his methods? 08:43 My biggest criticism of the book 09:49 The reader who may find it transformative 10:26 My final recommendation 10:58 Elon Musk’s recommended reading list 12:01 Final verdict Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcast.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/jjfq9eGReU Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcast Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast

In this Mere Mortals book review, I talk through The Odyssey by Homer the famous follow-up companion to The Iliad, and one of the great adventure stories of the Western canon. Compared with The Iliad, I found The Odyssey much more readable, more story-driven, and honestly more enjoyable. This is the great soldier-returning-home story: Odysseus trying to make his way back to Ithaca after the Trojan War, while Telemachus searches for answers, Penelope holds off the suitors, and the gods keep interfering with everyone’s lives. 0:00 Intro — The Odyssey after The Iliad 0:54 The basic structure of The Odyssey 1:18 Odysseus, Ulysses and the journey home 2:03 Telemachus, Penelope and the suitors 2:43 Where Odysseus has been 3:09 Cyclops, monsters and the famous adventures 3:46 Returning to Ithaca 4:04 The original soldier-coming-home story 4:25 Why The Odyssey reads better than The Iliad 5:02 The book that kept me reading at night 6:00 Why this story has lasted 7:10 Iliad vs Odyssey: rage vs cunning 8:19 Major themes: home, temptation, storytelling and justice 10:03 The parts I skimmed 10:43 Should you read The Iliad first? 11:37 Final thoughts on The Odyssey 12:26 Final recommendation Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcast.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/jjfq9eGReU Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcast Substack: https://substack.com/@meremortalsnotes Connect with Mere Mortals: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/ Discord: https://discord.gg/Xs9DjsurFq Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/meremortalspods Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meremortalspodcasts/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@meremortalspodcasts Value 4 Value Support: Website: https://www.meremortalspodcasts.com/support Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/meremortalspodcast