Advertise on podcast: Mental Capacity Matters with Alex Ruck Keene

In the latest ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Dr Jonathan Brown about the very different approach to the decision-making authority granted children in Scotland, prompted by his article arising out of this case decided in Scotland just before Christmas 2025. The discussion hopefully serves both to alert people to the fact that they should not assume that things are the same either side of the border, to start to think about why this might be the case, and what this might suggest in terms of law reform. [Note: Jonathan explains things with huge clarity, but, as we get into, this is a remarkably complicated area, so you may want to have a wet towel ready to wrap around your head]. For the original video, see here. If you want an overview of the position in England and Wales, this chapter by Dr Camilla Parker KC (Hon) (from the LAG Disabled Children: A Legal Handbook (available for free thanks to the Council for Disabled Children) is extremely helpful; if you want to know more about the position of 16/17 year olds, I have done a video, available here.

In this ‘in conversation’ with Dr Beverley Samways, we talk about the scoping review she has led on to review NHS restraint policies in relation to people with learning disabilities, in the context of Seni’s Law (the Mental Health Units (Use of Force) Act 2018), explaining the motivation, the findings and the recommendations, to be found on the resources page for the project here. The original video can be found here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Professor Tony David about his new paper, Insight, the law and psychiatry: Going round in circles or playing nice?. We talk about what ‘insight’ means clinically, and how law and medicine can have a more productive discussion about applying the concept in a way which better secures the interests of those whose capacity to make relevant decisions may be under examination. For the original video, see here.

In this ‘in conversation’ with Dr Joe Gough, we discuss some of the fruits of his British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University of Oxford looking at legal and medical assessments of decision-making capacity, how they misfire for the neurodivergent and cognitively disabled, and how this should inform philosophical accounts of agency and autonomy. In this conversation, we look in particular at the assessment of capacity in the context of anorexia, the challenges that anorexia poses to the very concept of capacity, and how to think about justifications for intervention without falling into ‘outcome’ based assessments of capacity. The papers we refer to in the discussion are. Affect, Autonomy, Authenticity, and the Assessment of Decision‐Making Capacity: The Problem of Tyrannical Coherence Decisional capacity, Cartesianism, the CRPD and obfuscating paternalism: substituting ‘supported’ for ‘substitute’ Race and mental capacity: no panacea Best interest and family compromise Joe also has a book forthcoming from Oxford University Press, After Mind: Myths of Mind and Mechanism in Philosophy, Science, Medicine, and Law, developing these arguments in a broader context. For the original video, see here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Nick Robinson, Professor Judy Laing, and Dr Jeremy Dixon about the website that they have recently been involved in setting up providing resources for nearest relatives under the Mental Health Act 1983. Nick gives the perspective of a nearest relative, Jeremy explains the research underpinning the project, Judy explains the resources available, and all three reflect on the difference between the law and legal literacy / legal confidence, and also give some thoughts about the move to ‘nominated persons’ to be brought in by the Mental Health Act 2025. For the original video, see here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to the lawyer and academic Dr János Fiala-Butora about his new book, Implementing the Right to Decide under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities (Hart, 2025). We think about the debates around legal capacity in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and discuss János’s innovative suggestions about how to move forward from a situation which appears to have become somewhat stuck. For the original video, see here. My review of János’s book is here (from which you will see why I was quite so keen to talk to him!).

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Professor Gareth Owen about his new book Psychiatry and Human Nature: Classic and Romantic Perspectives, and he helps unpack what ‘classic’ and ‘romantic’ mean in this context, moving into deep waters around capacity and risk to others as we go. The work that we discuss around mental capacity in the second part of the discussion can be accessed via this website. For the original video, see here.

Following on from my videos about capacity and best interests, this video seeks to put those concepts to practical application. The slides are here. Boring but necessary caveat: nothing in this constitutes legal advice

In this ‘in conversation’ with, I talk to Dr Susannah Bowyer, Deputy Director at Research in Practice, about the recent research paper published by Research in Practice and the National Children’s Bureau (commissioned by DfE) entitled (snappily) Improving the outcomes of looked-after children and young people in complex situations with multiple needs, at risk or subject to a Deprivation of Liberty.  Spoiler alert, we do not spend a great deal of time on the technicalities of deprivation of liberty, but instead think about the ‘upstream’ issues (we do, though, flag chapter 5 of the paper – the case-law briefing) written by Camilla Parker KC (Hon)). For the original video, see here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Professor John Coggon about his – deliberately! – provocative new paper Is Mental Capacity Law Law?. We think about what ‘law’ means in this context, and what judges are doing in legal terms when they are judging in the Court of Protection. And I charge John with nihilism… The original video is here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Peter Edwards, a solicitor who has just passed his 50 year mark working in mental health (and, since it became a ‘thing,’ mental capacity law), and who has had quite the most extraordinarily varied and significant impact in ways that you might not be aware of. The article that I mention which sets out some of the things that he has done is here, but we use the time to reflect on what has changed for the good, for the bad, and on the ways in which the law helps and hinders. The original video can be found here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Professor Peter Bartlett about his article “Beyond the liberal subject: challenges in interpreting the CRPD, and the CRPD’s challenges to human rights,” and discuss how the CRPD challenges conventional civil and political rights, the implications for the role of the state (and what happens if the state is not benign), and what the CRPD requires of civil society. As Peter notes, the article forms part of a special edition of the Human Rights Law Review on the CRPD and next generation human rights thinking. For the original video, see here.

In this ‘in conversation with,’ I talk to Jess Foulkes, Dr Suzanne Beeke and Dr Anna Volkmer about their paper in the International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Using Conversation Analysis to explore assessments of decision-making capacity in a hospital setting. We explore what ‘conversation analysis,’ means, and how it helps shed light on the process of capacity assessment. We also think about the implications for training and further research. (Note, there is a good cat intervention – hurrah – and an annoying ring tone – sorry – in this episode). For the original video, see here.

In this 'in discussion with,' I talk to Professor Anne-Maree Farell and Dr Patrick Hann, two of the co-authors of this paper recently published in the Medical Law Law Review, "Mental health and capacity laws in Northern Ireland: examining the position of children and young people."  We examine the (complex) story of law reform in this area in Northern Ireland, think about unfinished business, and reflect on the Northern Ireland experience as a case study for other jurisdictions. For the original video, see here.

In this ‘in conversation’ with, I talk to Professor Beverley Clough and Dr Laura Pritchard-Jones about the edited collection that they have recently pulled together on Mental Capacity Law, Sexual Relationships and Intimacy. We talk about the background to the book, including the JB case, and the different perspectives that it brings to the – possibly? – intractable problems that are encountered when the law reaches into the bedroom. For the original video, see here: Mental capacity law, sexual relationships and intimacy – in conversation with Beverley Clough and Laura Pritchard-Jones – Mental Capacity Law and Policy