1568115568
Case and Controversy

Advertise on podcast: Case and Controversy

Categories
Country
United States
This podcast has
3 episodes
Language
English
Publisher
Jenny
Explicit
No
Date created
2021/05/18
Latest episode
2022/05/12
Average duration
21 min.
Release period
180 days

Description

This podcast details the Supreme Court case Hodgsen v. Minn.

Unlock Case and Controversy podcast Email contact info,
Listeners & Audience details

Email contact information

Direct podcast contact details

Listeners

Audience numbers & engagement insights

Audience details

Podcast Insights

Podcast episodes

Check latest episodes from Case and Controversy podcast


A Family Response to Disaster
2022/05/12
Beinecke, R., Raymond, A., Cisse, M., Renna, K., Khan, S.,   Fuller, A., & Crawford, K. (2017). The mental health response to the   Boston bombing: a three-year review. International Journal of Mental   Health, 46(2), 89-124. Gates, J. D., Arabian, S., Biddinger, P., Blansfield, J., Burke, P., Chung, S., ... & Yaffe, M. B. (2014). The initial response to the Boston marathon bombing: lessons learned to prepare for the next disaster. Annals of surgery, 260(6), 960. Individual well-being and the allocation of time before and after the Boston Marathon Terrorist bombing. IZA. (n.d.). Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/9882/individual-well-being-and-the-allocation-of-time-before-and-after-the-boston-marathon-terrorist-bombing#:~:text=The%20bombing%20led%20to%20a,of%20the%20State%20of%20residence. O'Neill, A. (2015, May 15). Tsarnaev trial: Timeline of the bombings, Manhunt and aftermath. CNN. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/04/us/tsarnaev-trial-timeline/index.html
Episode 1: Taking JABS at the Tinker Creek Chemical Spill
2021/12/11
JABS (Jenny, Ainsley, Breanne, and Shayla) critiquing the policy around the 2017 Tinker Creek Chemical Spill, looking at it from a political ecology lens.
Noyes Case & Controversy
2021/05/18
This episode goes over the details of the case Hodgson v. Minn. It also gives context to what the case did then and how the precedent it set can be utilized now. 

Podcast reviews

Read Case and Controversy podcast reviews


0 out of 5
0 reviews

Podcast sponsorship advertising

Start advertising on Case and Controversy relevant audience podcasts


What do you want to promote?