Advertise on podcast: Beyond Coding

How do senior engineers use coding agents on prod infrastructure when “make no mistakes” is just a polite request? Kerim Satirli (HashiCorp, an IBM company) explains why prompt rules don’t hold in production, and what he runs instead. In this video, we cover: How Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, Contentful, Datadog, Okta, Cloudflare providers) evolved from open-source PRs to automated agent harnessesWhy AI skills files and “make no mistakes” prompts are only requests, and what replaces them in production pipelinesHow AI-generated pull requests are overwhelming open-source maintainers (and why projects like cURL are pushing back)Personalized “software factories”, spec-driven development (GitHub Spec Kit), and cutting AI documentation noise with BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)What open-source Rust clones of Adobe mean for the future of SaaSFor infrastructure engineers, DevOps practitioners, and software architects who want to move past one-shot prompting and run coding agents on production infrastructure without losing control. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Why “Make No Mistakes” Is a Polite Request 00:00:38 - How Open Source Terraform Changed Provisioning 00:01:59 - Why API-First Services Matter Beyond AWS and Azure 00:04:19 - How AI Agents Changed Terraform Provider Updates 00:07:03 - Why “Make No Mistakes” Won’t Stop Your Agent 00:10:31 - Bringing Determinism Back to Agentic Workflows 00:13:07 - How AI Pull Requests Are Overwhelming Open Source 00:15:41 - Why Every Engineer Is Building a Software Factory 00:18:52 - Why AI-Generated Documentation Slows Down Humans 00:23:12 - Using Agents to Filter Noise and Summarize Specs 00:27:02 - Escape Hatches for Automated Terraform Applies 00:29:03 - Where the Joy in Engineering Lives Now 00:31:24 - Spec-Driven Development and the Return of Architecture 00:34:51 - Open-Source Rust Clones, Reverse Engineering, and SaaS 00:38:19 - How to Build Software Products People Actually Want Guest: Kerim Satirli, Senior Developer Advocate at HashiCorp, an IBM company. https://www.linkedin.com/in/ksatirli #Terraform #CodingAgents #DevOps

Lead Architect Carlos Kelkboom shares his rules for coding agents and how great engineers architect software with AI. One of the great ones is: he throws away generated code the moment he doesn't understand it. He breaks down why coding agents fail at iterative changes, why his main agent never touches files, and how he scaffolds projects for one-shot execution. In this video, we cover: Why AI coding agents struggle with iterative changes (SlopCodeBench) and excel at one-shot executionHow to manually scaffold code, types, and folder boundaries before letting sub-agents runDesigning a distributed Markdown and indexed-search graph harness for progressive context disclosureUsing Git worktrees to run parallel coding agents and merge the best implementationsWhy dynamic memory and the heap need to disappear in favor of deterministic programming languagesHow AI bubbles and solo coding impact junior engineers and team collaborationThis episode is for software engineers, tech leads, and system architects who want to move beyond "vibe coding" and build maintainable, deterministic production software with AI agents. Connect with Carlos: https://www.linkedin.com/in/carlos-k-4016b8225 Timestamps:00:00:00 - Why Carlos Throws Away Working AI Code00:00:53 - Why Pull Requests and Team Collaboration Are Dying00:03:50 - The Trap of Starting Projects You Never Finish00:06:06 - Escaping the Solo AI Developer Bubble00:11:54 - How to Scaffold Code Before Using AI Agents00:15:54 - Learning New Programming Languages With AI Agents00:21:14 - Why We Must Get Rid of the Heap00:28:32 - Building a Shared Language Across Engineering Teams00:31:31 - Vibe Coding vs Deep Software Engineering00:40:12 - Code Is Cheap: Git Worktrees for Parallel Agents00:41:45 - How Deep to Scaffold Before the Agent Runs00:45:09 - Democratizing Software, Missing Juniors, and the AI Bubble00:53:33 - Designing a Graph Harness for AI Agent Context00:58:18 - Why His Main Agent Never Touches Files01:03:07 - Throw Away Code You Don't Understand01:06:25 - Rethinking Code Reviews and Mutation Testing for AI #CodingAgents #SoftwareEngineering #AgenticEngineering

What happens when coding agents see your entire system: code, services, infrastructure and live traffic, all connected? Most agents are blind to everything outside the repo. Adyen Staff Engineer Mat Jones explains what changed once theirs weren't, and why he calls it somewhat scary. In this video, we cover: Running five or six coding agents in parallel with git worktrees and Atrium, an internal tool that lets agents coordinate and share memoryArchitect: nine connected graphs in Neo4j covering services, code, DNS, data stores and infrastructureIngesting 7 million trace spans a second with Kafka and Apache Flink, and what collapsed on the first trySentinel: anti-pattern monitoring, with agents that raise the fix as a merge requestMCP vs APIs vs CLI tools, and how to deal with tool bloatThis episode is for software engineers and platform teams who want coding agents to reason about real systems, not just the repo in front of them. You'll leave with a concrete place to start and an honest view of the risks. 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:42 - Running Five Coding Agents in Parallel 00:01:35 - Atrium: How Agents Avoid Stepping on Each Other 00:06:57 - Why Graphs Save Coding Agents Tokens 00:12:25 - What Is Architect? Nine Graphs in One Database 00:16:54 - What Broke at 7 Million Spans a Second 00:20:37 - The Timeline From Proof of Concept to Production 00:27:59 - Tracing Code Changes to Critical Payment Flows 00:30:26 - How to Start: Build Scrappy, Then Earn Buy-In 00:35:07 - Making a Codebase Agent Friendly With Skills and Hooks 00:42:07 - Why You Should Start With a Service Graph 00:44:46 - The Downside of Everyone Seeing Everything 00:48:34 - Sentinel: Agents That Find and Fix Anti-Patterns 00:53:01 - Are We Going Too Fast With AI? 01:01:55 - Two Engineers, Four Months: Why Big Bets Got Cheaper 01:07:11 - MCP vs CLI Tools and the Tool Bloat Problem Guest: Mat Jones, Staff Engineer at Adyen https://www.linkedin.com/in/mathewwjones #codingagents #softwareengineering #platformengineering

HumanLayer CEO Dexter Horthy, who coined "context engineering", on why AI agents degrade codebases over time. He breaks down a benchmark that measures AI code quality across features, and how his team ships with agents without drowning in slop. In this video, we cover: SlopCodeBench, SWE-bench and which coding benchmarks to trustToken maxing, dark factories and the "Instagram phase" of AI engineeringWhy 2-4x productivity beats chasing 100xPull requests, design docs and how engineers build taste nowDex's agentic engineering workflow: one-shots, overnight janitor bots and research-design-planFor engineers and engineering leaders adopting AI coding agents who want to know what's real and what works in teams at scale. Timestamps:00:00:00 - The Man Who Coined the Term: Context Engineering00:00:54 - SlopCodeBench: Proof AI Makes Codebases Worse Over Time00:05:49 - Background Agents and the Enterprise Friction Problem00:08:13 - Why You'll Never One-Shot a Big Feature00:11:18 - Scaling Agentic Engineering to 1,000 Engineers00:16:19 - Dark Factories, Fake Hype and Token Maxing00:19:55 - Why 2-4x Faster Beats Chasing 100x00:21:31 - Should Teams Stop Doing Pull Requests?00:24:20 - Can Deterministic Tools Replace Code Review?00:27:37 - How to Build Engineering Taste When AI Writes Code00:33:05 - Dex's Agentic Workflow: One-Shots and Janitor Bots00:35:18 - Research, Design, Plan: Shipping Big Features With Agents00:38:35 - Why Overnight Agents and Heavy Parallelism Backfire00:40:10 - Subscription Maxing vs Paying Per Token00:42:40 - Parallelize Like Poker, Not a Slot Machine Dex Horthy: https://x.com/dexhorthyDex's talks and deep dives: https://aithatworks.bold.video #AgenticEngineering #AICoding #SoftwareEngineering

Amp ships to production around 50 times a day with AI agents, but the change that makes their team ship faster isn't AI at all. Dario Hamidi, AI engineer at Amp, makes the case that pull requests are holding your team back, and explains what replaces them. In this video, we cover: Why Amp works without pull requests or feature branches, and how to try it with your own teamAgent permissions, approval fatigue, and building environments where you can trust agentsOrbs: remote agent execution, parallelism, and multiplayer sessionsShort-lived credentials and workload identity federation for cloud agentsTriaging 60+ bug reports a day with agents without frying your brainFor engineers and engineering leads who want to ship faster with AI agents and are ready to question the workflows they've always used. Timestamps:00:00:00 - Is It Time to Kill the Pull Request?00:00:45 - What Happens If Every PR Gets Auto-Closed Tomorrow00:05:04 - Pull Requests Were Built for Strangers, Not Teammates00:07:20 - Does Dropping PRs Hurt Quality at Scale?00:08:53 - Agent Permissions: Why No Default Makes Everyone Happy00:12:42 - Don't Juggle Knives: Building Environments You Can Trust00:14:56 - The Hidden Hard Parts of Cloud Agents00:16:39 - What's an Orb? Remote Agent Execution Explained00:19:10 - How to Give Agents Credentials Without Leaking Secrets00:22:51 - Why Orbs Live Forever (and Multiplayer Orbs)00:25:49 - The State Management Problem Nobody Talks About00:29:22 - When Will Everyone Have Remote Dev Environments?00:32:23 - Orbs That Spawn Orbs: Orchestrating Agents at Scale00:34:42 - How Dario Triages 60 Bug Reports a Day With Agents00:39:23 - Avoiding Burnout When Agents Remove the Ceiling #AIAgents #SoftwareEngineering #PullRequests

How do top engineers still get hired in 2026 when most applicants get ghosted, 120,000 people have been laid off this year, and hiring managers say they can't find talent? A recruiter, a hiring lead, a career coach and an open source engineer explain why your resume is dead on arrival when every CV looks the same, and what actually gets you in the room instead. In this episode, we cover: Why 120,000 tech layoffs and 60,000 open engineering roles exist at the same timeWhy only 20% of LinkedIn messages get a reply, and how to write the ones that doWhy one hiring team bans AI tools in interviews and is building an agentic coding session insteadAdaptability and resilience: the two soft skills that keep you in the roomGetting hired through GitHub, referrals and open source when your CV can't stand outWhether junior engineers still have a path, and which engineering cohort is at risk in 3 to 5 yearsTitles vs scope: how to grow when your title never changesFor software engineers, students about to graduate, and anyone in tech who wants to know what recruiters and hiring managers are actually filtering on right now. Timestamps:00:00:00 - Intro: 1,000 Layoffs a Day00:00:47 - How Bad Is the Tech Job Market in 2026?00:02:05 - Why 120K Layoffs and 60K Open Jobs Don't Add Up00:03:40 - Why AI Tools Are Banned From Interviews00:06:28 - Hard Skills Get You In, Soft Skills Keep You There00:09:20 - "I'm a University Dropout": How GitHub Got Me Hired00:10:18 - CVs Are Too Good Now: Why Referrals Win00:13:04 - How to Get Your Open Source PR Merged00:15:02 - Why 80% of Your LinkedIn Messages Get Ghosted00:16:51 - How Open Source Led to a HashiCorp Job Offer00:19:15 - Is There Still a Place for Junior Engineers?00:22:00 - The Engineers Who'll Be Obsolete in 3 to 5 Years00:24:20 - Should You Contribute to Open Source at All?00:26:05 - AI Skills Required, Algorithms Still Tested00:27:54 - Stop Chasing Titles: Scope, Impact and Owning Your Career #softwareengineering #techjobs #careeradvice

Jordan Tigani helped create Google BigQuery, then got fired as Chief Product Officer on a Friday morning. He planned to hack on DuckDB to learn Rust. Investors offered to fund it before he'd decided to start a company. That company became MotherDuck In this episode, we cover: The DuckDB Labs partnership: why MotherDuck gave the open-source creators a co-founder share instead of going open-coreFrom alpha to paid product: 11 founders, 3 to 4 months to alpha, two years to something people would pay forAI on top of the data warehouse: vibe-coded dashboards (Dives), pipelines (Flights), a context layer (Guides), and why business users catch mistakes analysts missAre dashboards dead? Jordan wrote "Big Data Is Dead"; his answer on dashboards is differentCareer advice: why you shouldn't want to work on the query optimizer, and the skill Jordan says matters moreFor engineers curious about database and infrastructure companies, open-source business models, and how AI is changing who gets to ask questions of data. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:32 - Fired on a Friday: how MotherDuck accidentally started 00:04:50 - Giving DuckDB Labs a co-founder share of the company 00:07:43 - Why most open-source SaaS products are just "managed" 00:09:31 - Why VCs said yes: Snowflake, DuckDB, and BigQuery credibility 00:10:50 - The 11-person founding team that skipped the wrong designs 00:12:20 - Alpha in 4 months, beta in a year, paid in two 00:15:20 - Vibe-coded BI: Dives, Flights, Guides, and an agent harness 00:20:10 - The questions business users ask that analysts never do 00:24:14 - Are dashboards dead in the age of agents? 00:27:57 - Everybody wants to work on the optimizer (don't) 00:31:23 - The engineer superpower most engineers look down on 00:33:20 - Writing: the one skill Jordan would learn (and still hates) 00:36:05 - Does contributing to DuckDB get you hired at MotherDuck? 00:37:20 - Why a database company leaned into the duck #MotherDuck #DuckDB #SoftwareEngineering

Niantic Spatial CTO Brian McClendon on how the best engineers solve problems most give up on — from a 4D model of the world to shipping research in months. He built Google Earth and ran Google Maps for over a decade, and he's been there, done that. What he's building now is harder, and it's already live for customers. Along the way: who makes it on his team and who doesn't, and the one piece of advice he'd give every engineer using AI. In this video, we cover: - The 4D model of the world: visual positioning, change detection, and treating a pile of photos like a database - Gaussian splats and real-to-sim: capturing a room and loading it into Nvidia Isaac to train robots - Turning a research idea into a production service in six months - What Google Maps taught him about building for robots instead of humans - Designing problems AI can self-check, and why token maxing is a waste For engineers and engineering leaders who want to work on problems that don't have a known answer yet — and who want to know what a CTO who's built the definitive product in his field looks for in the people he hires. Recorded at the AI4 conference 2026. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Google Earth? Been There, Done That 00:00:46 - Turning a Research Idea Into Production in 6 Months 00:02:37 - How Any Photo Gets Located Within Half a Meter 00:06:37 - The Long-Term Goal: A 4D Model of the World 00:08:37 - Treating a Pile of Photos Like a Database 00:11:58 - What Google Maps Taught Him About Training Robots 00:15:22 - Gaussian Splats Explained in Plain Terms 00:17:42 - The Unsolved Problem: Scale and Semantic Change 00:20:34 - Why Google Earth Is Good Enough 00:22:09 - Who Makes It on His Team and Who Doesn't 00:23:38 - Designing Problems AI Can Self-Check 00:26:03 - The Insights Hidden in the Physical World 00:28:18 - Digital Twins, Cities, and Ready Player One 00:31:35 - Visual Positioning When GPS Gets Spoofed 00:33:24 - Token Maxing Is B******t: Advice for Engineers Guest: Brian McClendon, CTO at Niantic Spatial. The engineer behind Google Earth; ran Google Maps for over a decade. https://www.linkedin.com/in/brianmcclendon #NianticSpatial #GoogleEarth #SoftwareEngineering

How do new staff engineers build judgment without the years of experience that used to come with the role? Mallika Rao, engineering leader in big tech, explains why the data-structures-and-algorithms foundation everyone was trained on is no longer enough on its own, and where the complexity has actually shifted now that AI writes the implementation. In this video, we cover: Why "how does AI affect engineers" is the wrong question, and what to ask insteadRehearsing multiple futures: what judgment looks like in a staff engineerThe case method: building judgment from incident reports and system design history instead of waiting years for itCognitive coordination, code review load, and the surprise ask for more meetings at staff levelTiger teams vs scaled teams, trust as architecture, and building evals from a spreadsheetSplitting planning from execution so engineers stop falling behind with agentsTaste vs judgment, and how to build both outside of softwareIf you've just made staff, or you're about to, this conversation gives you a frame for what the level actually demands now and how to grow into it faster than the old apprenticeship allowed. Recorded at the AI4 conference 2026. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - How AI Is Changing Senior Engineering Careers 00:00:41 - Why "How Does AI Affect Engineers" Is the Wrong Question 00:03:26 - What Judgment Actually Is: Rehearsing Multiple Futures 00:05:24 - Why Data Structures and Algorithms Are No Longer Enough 00:07:22 - Learning Judgment From Incident Reports Like the 2017 S3 Outage 00:11:13 - The New Staff Engineer's Core Challenge: Cognitive Coordination 00:14:48 - What Managers, Universities, and Shakespeare Each Owe You 00:17:55 - Code Review Load, Meeting Notes, and the Surprise Ask for More Meetings 00:23:59 - Trust as Architecture: Why Evals Started as a Spreadsheet 00:27:09 - Tiger Teams vs Big Teams: Product Managers Reviewing Code 00:32:39 - Why Some Engineers Can't Keep Up With Agents 00:35:46 - Local AI Champions and Splitting Planning From Execution 00:38:38 - Go Deep or Go Broad? Search in a World of Agents 00:44:12 - Taste vs Judgment: Thinking in 50 Layers Guest: Mallika Rao, engineering leader in big tech. Rehearshing the Future framework  If by Rudyard Kipling

How does Amazon build its agentic AI? Michael Giannangeli, Head of Product for Amazon Nova and Agentic AI, breaks down evals, RL gyms, and model routing. He also explains why the bottleneck in software has shifted away from engineering hours and what takes its place. In this video, we cover: The eval lifecycle: building from real failure modes, saturation, and why 100% means deleteRL gyms: training models on real environments like migrations, DevOps, and pen testingModel routing, cost-per-token trade-offs, and why routing isn't solvedThe agent stack of an Amazon product lead: Claude Code, Codex, and KiroAutonomous migrations, trust, and how much human-in-the-loop survivesFor engineers and product people building with AI agents who want to see how a frontier lab actually closes its feedback loops. Recorded at the AI4 conference 2026. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:36 - The Agents an Amazon Product Lead Uses Daily 00:03:36 - Why Nobody's Heard of Amazon Nova 00:04:55 - Model Costs and the Routing Problem 00:08:10 - Why Building Good Evals Is So Hard 00:10:05 - When Evals Saturate and Get Deleted 00:12:17 - Turning Real Failure Modes Into Hundreds of Evals 00:15:26 - Improving Models Without Training on Customer Data 00:18:26 - If Everyone Uses Agents, You Need Agents 00:20:22 - The Bottleneck Is No Longer Engineering Hours 00:23:20 - Ship Fast to Validate the Right Thing 00:26:44 - Staying at the Frontier Amid Constant Noise 00:29:37 - Spend 10-20% of Your Time Experimenting 00:32:54 - RL Gyms: How Models Learn From Failure 00:37:09 - Will Migrations Become Fully Autonomous? Guest: Michael Giannangeli - Head of Product, Agentic AI & Amazon Nova at Amazon #AmazonNova #AgenticAI #AIEngineering

AI is changing what developers build, but code alone is no longer enough to prove what you can do. Wes Bos explains why engineers need to solve problems beyond syntax, how agent workflows are reshaping software development, and what still requires human thinking. In this conversation: The limits of generative UI and AI-generated designAgent loops, harnesses, and cheaper AI modelsThe rising cost of AI coding and the case for local hardwareWhy developer education is shifting from syntax to problem-solvingPersonal branding, conferences, newsletters, and AI-generated contentFor developers navigating AI-assisted coding, this episode explores the skills and signals that still help you stand out. This podcast was recorded at JSNation, the key web dev conference. OUTLINE 00:00:00 - Code Is Not Enough for Developers 00:00:32 - Why Generative UI Still Feels Unfinished 00:04:35 - How Agent Loops Improve AI Coding 00:07:06 - When Agent Workflows Become Standard Tools 00:08:19 - Are Cheaper AI Models Good Enough? 00:10:44 - Can AI Coding Costs Stay Sustainable? 00:12:24 - What Engineers Need To Learn Now 00:14:23 - Why Fundamentals Matter Beyond Syntax 00:15:34 - How Non-Coders Are Building Production Tools 00:16:21 - Why In-Person Conferences Still Matter 00:18:11 - Personal Branding When Code Isn't Enough 00:20:37 - Can Newsletters Beat The Attention Crisis? 00:22:02 - Why AI-Generated Content Feels Insulting 00:24:12 - Use AI To Scaffold, Not Think

Answering engineer questions on AI pressure, career growth, product thinking and impact. Including the production incident I'm glad happened, and the mindset I refuse to accept when things break. In this video, we cover: - Whether managers are really demanding more output because of AI - Balancing fundamentals with AI coding tools and agents early in your career - Specialist vs generalist and when to lean into each - Visibility, personal branding and who gets credit for your work - Product thinking, evaluating impact and what I got wrong about content being king For software engineers at any level who want honest answers on career strategy in the agent era, from someone doing both engineering and product. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - How to Spot the Next Big Thing 00:03:15 - The Saying I Hate Most 00:04:27 - The Production Mistake I'm Glad I Made 00:07:32 - Are Managers Demanding More Because of AI? 00:13:39 - Learning Fundamentals vs AI Coding Tools 00:19:00 - Will AI Ever Get Good at Distributed Systems? 00:20:51 - Specialist vs Generalist: When to Lean In 00:26:35 - How to Become More Visible in Your Org 00:31:49 - I Was Wrong: Content Isn't King 00:35:03 - Workflows, Priorities and Hiring an Editor 00:37:08 - What Being a Force Multiplier Really Means 00:41:26 - How to Evaluate What's Worth Building 00:45:01 - Product Thinking Without Years of Experience 00:48:13 - Energy Management, Curiosity and Defining Success 00:54:21 - Hair Talk

How do you prove AI is shipping more features? Amos Haviv leads the Developer Workflow teams at Booking.com, supporting 4000 engineers operating 8000 repos. Everybody is burning through their AI budget right now and almost nobody can answer what it bought them. Amos can, because his team spent four years building an event system to debug their own SDLC before AI upped the urgency. In this video, we cover: Why verification is the bottleneck right now, and where it moves nextBuilding an event store that separates KTLO from real feature deliveryWhy static dashboards create the metric they measure, and the cobra story behind itAgent cost, model routing, and why Booking ignores token maxing entirelyRunning a developer survey with a 92% response rate across 3k+ engineersWho should own skills and MCPs: a central platform team or the domain experts?For platform engineers, engineering leaders, and anyone being asked to prove ROI on AI tooling this quarter. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Everyone is burning through their budget 00:00:32 - Verification Is the Bottleneck Every Team Hit 00:03:35 - 4,000 Engineers and 8,000 Repos at Booking.com 00:06:48 - Why Copying Google and OpenAI Will Break You 00:09:21 - Verification Is a Stack of Agents, Not One Review 00:13:27 - Cost Is Becoming a Bottleneck of Its Own 00:17:14 - Was the Internet a Bubble? What That Teaches Us 00:25:32 - What Working With the Frontier Labs Looks Like 00:28:26 - Debugging the SDLC With Four Years of Event Data 00:30:24 - Do Engineers Using AI Actually Ship More Features? 00:37:13 - Where to Start If You Measure Nothing Today 00:45:01 - The Cobra Effect: When a Metric Becomes a Target 00:52:23 - Everyone Is a Builder Now, and Everything Needs Support 01:01:21 - Is AI Turning Every Engineer Into a Manager? 01:03:46 - The Developer Survey With a 92% Response Rate 01:10:09 - Who Owns Skills, MCPs, and the Enterprise Harness 01:17:46 - Great Developer Experience Is High Velocity Mentioned in the episode: High Output Management by Andy Grove The Sovereign Individual (1997) The story of General Magic Views expressed are Amos's own and do not represent Booking.com. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #DeveloperExperience

"I need to stop using Opus. This doesn't work." That was Heitor Lessa's conclusion after a refactor cost him 200 million tokens, and it forced him to rebuild the entire agent workflow now available for 1400 engineers. Heitor spent 11 years at AWS, built Lambda Powertools to 230 billion API calls a week, and in this episode he walks through the full SDLC workflow on screen, from discovery to merge check. In this episode, we cover: The product loop: discovery, whiteboarding, and the /roadmap commandSpec-driven development with Open Spec and why vanilla setups failThree model tiers: SOTA for planning, mid-tier for implementation, cheap models for reviewsMerge checks with adversarial reviewers and attestations that catch agents fabricating test resultsThe /retro command: using the Socratic method to make your workflow more deterministicIf you're an engineer figuring out how to work with agents at team scale without losing trust in your codebase, this is the workflow to steal. This is also the first Beyond Coding episode with visuals on screen, so let me know what you think of the format. Timestamps:00:00:00 - The Math Doesn't Add Up00:00:43 - Amazon Hypergrowth: 11 Years, 8 Different Roles00:03:29 - Learning From the Trenches as a Technical Account Manager00:08:38 - Developer Identity and the Birth of Lambda Powertools00:10:20 - The Hard Parts of Working in Public00:13:12 - How Powertools Hit 230 Billion API Calls a Week00:16:42 - Career Advice: Learn Adjacent Roles, Not More Tech00:19:37 - When Leadership Decisions Don't Make Sense to You00:23:21 - The Product Loop Starts With Discovery00:25:22 - From Whiteboard to /roadmap00:27:37 - Why Humans Plan First and Agents Come Second00:30:33 - Commands vs Skills Across 32 Different Models00:33:38 - Adversarial Reviewers on Every Plan00:36:07 - The Socratic Method, Explained00:40:29 - Why He Only Takes Paper Notes00:44:43 - The Five-Line Paper Trick for High-Stakes Meetings00:48:18 - /new-work: Capturing Scope Creep Without Derailing00:54:03 - The Dev Loop Begins: Open Spec Explore00:56:34 - Three Model Tiers: SOTA, Mid, Cheap00:57:43 - The $5,000/Month Per Engineer Question00:58:57 - Guardrails vs Autonomy for 1,400 Engineers01:04:22 - Auto-Sizer: Does This Task Even Need a Spec?01:07:26 - Decision Fatigue and Why Frameworks Win01:09:10 - The Plan Phase: Specs, Design, Formal Verification01:13:07 - The Refactor That Cost 200 Million Tokens01:15:11 - When Agents Forge Evidence They Ran Your Tests01:17:27 - Local-First Architecture Explained01:23:04 - The Apply Phase: Fully Autonomous Loops01:24:30 - Coding Was Never the Bottleneck01:26:39 - Why This Workflow Is an Investment01:27:39 - Decision Logs and the /onboarding Command01:29:06 - Running Agents Locally With Enterprise Governance01:32:42 - Hooks: Making Quality Gates Deterministic01:36:02 - Merge Checks: 15 Adversarial Reviewers Per Change01:38:30 - /retro: Interviewing Yourself to Improve the Loop01:43:12 - Trust, Loss of Trust, and Recovery With Agents01:48:02 - Experience, Scars, and Critical Thinking01:49:32 - Why Right Now Is the Time to Experiment01:52:04 - Conviction Comes From Being in the Loop #softwareengineering #aiagents #aws

What senior engineers do differently has less to do with output than most career ladders suggest, and Lindsey Simon, VP of Engineering at Vercel, has watched the distinction sharpen as everyone in the valley becomes a "member of technical staff." From why new grads with hackathon years might out-prepare engineers with six years on the job, to what happens when PR throughput stops being your lever, this is a conversation about what earns seniority now. In this episode, we cover: Why engineering roles are consolidating into "member of technical staff"How to ask agents first and frame better questions to humansThe scope-of-impact ladder and what the best engineers systematizeLearning how to learn: closing gaps to 100% understandingWhy writing is the skill that scalesIf you're wondering whether your years of experience still compound, or you're early-career and tired of the "woe is the juniors" narrative, this one reframes both. This podcast was recorded at TechLead Conference, a conference for engineering leaders on adopting AI. TIMESTAMPS00:00:00 - Impact the Business00:00:31 - FOMO all the time: The 2006 Google Interview00:01:52 - Engineering Roles Are Consolidating00:02:52 - The "Member of Technical Staff" trend in SF00:03:33 - Interns Demo to the CTO00:04:33 - How New Grads Out-Prepare Senior Engineers00:06:10 - Ask Your Agent Before You Ask a Human00:08:01 - Digging Backwards Into Fundamental Understanding00:09:22 - "We're All Junior Engineers Again"00:10:22 - Management Is Not Leadership00:12:04 - Losing PR Throughput as Your #1 Lever00:13:11 - Fulfillment Beyond Shipping Features00:14:32 - Building for Fickle Engineers: Telemetry Beats Opinions00:16:11 - Watching Users Struggle With Your Product00:18:12 - Have Expectations for Seniors Actually Changed?00:19:57 - Claude Says a Month, It Takes Two Hours00:20:33 - What the Best Engineers Do Differently00:21:30 - How Vercel React Skill Came to Be00:22:23 - Why Conference Conversations Hit Different00:23:35 - Learning How to Learn: Close Gaps to 100%00:25:41 - The Case for Liberal Arts in Tech00:27:03 - Get Feedback Early, Don't Hide in the Cave Guest - Lindsey Simon, VP of Engineering at Vercel: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindseysimon #softwareengineering #ai #careergrowth