Advertise on podcast: Theology Central

The hunt continues. With Bible and notebook in hand, we step into Ezekiel 28:13 and test every claim carefully. Is this Satan in Eden—or poetic language describing the king of Tyre's wealth and pride? No systems. No shortcuts. Just slow, contextual reading.

Before critiquing Bart Ehrman's ideas, we ask a simpler question: Who is he? A thoughtful look at his life, journey, and influence on modern Bible scholarship.

Tonight I sat down to watch a boxing match and witnessed something I've never seen before in decades of watching the sport — a fighter literally lost his toupee mid-fight and threw it into the crowd.

In Part 2 of Answering the Objections, we examine another passage cited against Revelation 19–20: Ezekiel 28. Reading the chapter in context and history, we ask a simple question—does this text actually describe Satan and final judgment, or the very real fall of Tyre? Instead of proof-texting, we slow down and let the text speak for itself.

Ezekiel 28 is one of the most quoted passages used to describe Satan's fall. But does the text actually say that? Before assuming anything, we slow down, read the context, and start a careful, verse-by-verse search. Grab your Bible and your notebook — the Great Satan Hunt begins.

As we work carefully through every major passage about judgment after death, a lengthy YouTube comment challenged the series, claiming key verses were being ignored and offering several proof texts to support annihilationism. Rather than rush past those claims, we slow down and take them seriously. In this first installment of Answering the Objections, we examine John 11:26 in context—reading the passage carefully, looking at the Greek, comparing translations, and asking a simple question: is this verse actually about hell or final punishment at all?

After a week of sickness and total exhaustion, I couldn't sleep—so I hit record. A late-night, unscripted reflection on limits, weakness, lament, and the theology you discover when your body forces you to stop.

I haven't been on the air since Sunday, and a few people have noticed. No, I didn't die—but I did get seriously sick. In this episode, I give an update, explain what's been going on, and reflect a bit on limits, burnout, and the reality that sometimes your body just shuts the whole operation down.

We use the five layers to look at Psalm 40 and a sermon on Psalm 40

Psalm 62:1 is often used as a generic call to patience and trust—but is that what the verse is actually saying? In this episode, we slow down and read Psalm 62:1 in its literary, historical, and covenant context and discover that this is not about waiting for God to fix our personal circumstances, but about David and Israel waiting on God to fulfill His promises.

In a previous episode we carefully studied Psalm 62:1 in its context. In this episode, we go back and review the short sermon that originally sparked that study and ask a simple question: does this message actually explain the text, or does it turn the text into something else?

We often talk about asking questions of the Bible—but are we asking the right ones? This episode uses a recent article on curiosity in the Christian life as a springboard to introduce The Five Layers of Reading Any Biblical Text, a simple framework for learning how to actually listen to Scripture before jumping to application.

In this episode, I discuss the 2025 film The Long Walk and why it affected me so deeply. After summarizing the movie and its story, I reflect on how it becomes a powerful picture of life itself—endurance, exhaustion, suffering, and what eventually breaks people. This is not a traditional movie review, but a personal and philosophical meditation on what it means to keep going in a world that slowly wears us down.

In The Flood Problem –we ask why the flood happened and why the standard explanation doesn't actually work. If the flood was meant to deal with human sin, why does sin immediately explode again after it's over? And why does the New Testament connect the flood to imprisoned spirits who were disobedient in Noah's day? By working carefully through Genesis 6, this episode shows that the flood story begins with something far more disturbing than we are usually told—and that the real problem has never been properly addressed.

After seeing in Part 1 how a 1988 sermon exposed a deep hermeneutical collapse, this episode steps back and asks a bigger question: what was fundamentalism originally, and how did it become what it is today?