Advertise on podcast: Timeless Spirituality

What if your soul originated somewhere beyond Earth? And how can you distinguish spiritual knowledge from something you simply believe? Daniel welcomes Katia, founder of Bluebird by Katia, for a lively, occasionally contentious, and often hilarious conversation about starseeds, extraterrestrial consciousness, channeling, and spiritual awakening. Katia shares her experiences communicating with what she believes are Pleiadian beings and explains her understanding of multidimensional existence, parallel incarnations, and humanity's possible transition from 3D to 5D consciousness. But Daniel has questions. Who are these extraterrestrial beings, and why would they be influencing life on Earth? How can someone verify information received through channeling? And does the growing popularity of spirituality indicate an evolution in human consciousness, or could there be a more conventional explanation? The conversation takes a particularly interesting turn when Katia distinguishes between starseeds and lightworkers. Daniel challenges whether these labels risk creating spiritual hierarchies, where some individuals consider themselves more evolved or enlightened than others. From there, they explore the role of ego in spirituality, the difference between confidence and superiority, and whether genuine spiritual growth requires transcending the very need to feel special. Despite their different perspectives, Daniel and Katia find common ground in their desire to help others and encourage greater compassion. Their exchange raises a question that extends far beyond spirituality: When something feels profoundly true, does that make it true? And sometimes, the most revealing question is the simplest: How do you know? Connect with Katia: Website: https://www.bluebirdbykatia.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/blue_bird_by_katia?srtk=MXNmcDdxdm91b3VucQ== Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel's endorsement of those claims.

What happens when an atheist and a past life regressionist sit down to discuss religion, astrology, and the nature of belief? And what happens when they begin questioning not just each other's beliefs, but the standards they use to determine what's true? Unquestionable Calvin Smith returns to Timeless Spirituality for another spirited, occasionally provocative, and often hilarious conversation with Daniel about faith, skepticism, morality, and the burden of proof. A former believer in Christianity and various conspiracy theories, Calvin explains how reading the Bible ultimately led him toward atheism. Today, he challenges religious beliefs publicly, encouraging people to examine the very texts upon which their convictions are based. The conversation begins with the Dead Sea Scrolls, the historical reliability of the Bible, and whether discrepancies between ancient manuscripts undermine claims of divine inspiration. Daniel and Calvin explore the distinction between a text containing historical information and that text being historically or spiritually authoritative. But things become considerably more heated when Calvin argues that religious texts should be banned. Daniel challenges him on the implications of that position, questioning whether suppressing religious literature risks reproducing the very intolerance Calvin condemns. Together, they examine the harm religion has caused throughout history, the good it may still provide, and whether morality, community, and compassion can survive without religious institutions. Then the conversation takes an entirely different turn: astrology. Calvin dismisses astrology as an unsupported belief system, while Daniel explains why he continues to find value in it despite acknowledging that he cannot scientifically prove its underlying claims. What begins as a disagreement about planetary influences evolves into a much broader discussion about personality, nature versus nurture, scientific evidence, and the limits of human understanding. What constitutes proof? How much weight should we give scientific consensus? Is the absence of evidence sufficient reason to dismiss a possibility? And when does keeping an open mind become an unwillingness to accept what the available evidence suggests? As the two challenge each other's reasoning, they discover that their disagreements extend beyond what they believe. They also differ in how they evaluate evidence, approach uncertainty, and decide which possibilities deserve serious consideration. Throughout it all, Daniel and Calvin maintain the playful rapport that made their first conversation so enjoyable. Their exchanges are filled with sarcasm, unexpected detours, and a willingness to challenge one another without allowing their disagreements to become personal. Connect with Unquestionable Calvin Smith YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@UnquestionableCalvin TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@unquestionablecalvin Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/unquestionablecalvin/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UnquestionableCalvin Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/UnquestionableCalvin Linktree: https://linktr.ee/CalvinSmith Previous Podcast: Unquestionable with Calvin Smith Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/unquestionable-with-calvin-smith/id1561094685 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/17GbvWb8GEn35tY6kMkWM2 Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel's endorsement of those claims.

One of Timeless Spirituality's most polarizing and requested guests returns. Flat Earth Dave (David Weiss) joins Daniel “The Past Life Regressionist” for another conversation about the shape of our world, the nature of reality, and the difference between believing something and knowing it. But this time, the conversation takes a different approach. Rather than simply exploring Dave's beliefs and the evidence he presents, Daniel revisits claims from their original interview, challenges the reasoning behind them, and examines the consistency of Dave's arguments. The focus shifts from what Dave believes to why he believes it, and how he distinguishes personal conviction from demonstrable knowledge. The discussion explores the idea that the globe narrative exists to make humanity feel insignificant, the relationship between a creator and the shape of the Earth, Antarctica, the 24-hour Antarctic sun, and The Final Experiment. Throughout the exchange, Daniel challenges Dave's reasoning, examines the distinction between evidence and interpretation, and asks whether someone who claims to value open-mindedness can remain open to being wrong. Dave's bio: David Weiss, known as Flat Earth Dave, is an American podcaster and speaker who advocates for the flat Earth perspective. Originally from the East Coast of the United States, Weiss left a successful corporate career to pursue his interest in alternative theories. He began by hosting a conspiracy-themed comedy show in New York City, which led him to explore the flat Earth concept. Initially skeptical, his research convinced him of its validity, prompting him to dedicate himself to sharing this viewpoint. Weiss is the creator of The Flat Earth Podcast and the Flat Earth Sun, Moon & Zodiac Clock app, tools he uses to present his ideas and encourage others to question mainstream scientific narratives. Direct Link to The Flat Earth Sun, Moon & Zodiac Clock app - https://qrco.de/bbizVA Social Media Profiles: Website - https://www.FlatEarthDave.com YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/DITRH/featured Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/theflatearthpodcast/ Disclaimer: The views, opinions, and claims expressed by guests on Timeless Spirituality are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the host or the podcast. Daniel “The Past Life Regressionist” does not endorse or assume responsibility for the accuracy of statements made by guests. The purpose of these conversations is to encourage curiosity, critical thinking, and open dialogue.

What does it really mean to be authentic? And how do we know when we're trusting our intuition versus simply believing what we want to believe? Daniel welcomes Kristen Leigh Griffiths, host of Clarity to Consciousness, for a conversation about spirituality, self-worth, and the sometimes uncomfortable process of learning to trust ourselves. The conversation begins with a story about Daniel's appearance on Kristen's podcast and how it unexpectedly opened the door to a meaningful conversation with one of his oldest friends. From there, Kristen shares her own spiritual journey, including how spirituality helped her navigate a difficult period in her life and eventually inspired her to create a platform where others could explore unfamiliar ideas without fear of judgment. But as Kristen explains her growing desire to step into the role of a spiritual teacher, Daniel begins asking some more challenging questions. What qualifies someone to teach others about spirituality? Where does personal belief end and objective reality begin? And when someone claims to receive messages from spiritual guides, how can they distinguish genuine intuition from their own thoughts? The conversation takes a playful turn when Daniel puts Kristen's openness to the test, presenting hypothetical claims about channeled messages, the nature of reality, and even water freezing at 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Together, they explore the importance of discernment, the difference between entertaining an extraordinary possibility and accepting it as fact, and the responsibility that comes with giving spiritual ideas a public platform. But underneath the philosophical questions is something far more personal. Kristen opens up about her struggles with self-worth, her tendency to make herself small, and the realization that even on her own podcast, she sometimes hasn't felt worthy of taking up space. She shares how those patterns developed, what she's learned about herself, and why she's beginning to recognize that her experiences and perspectives have value. And Daniel has one more question for her: Why is she worthy of that space? As the conversation unfolds, something interesting happens. Despite being challenged on several of her beliefs, Kristen doesn't retreat or try to tell Daniel what he wants to hear. She remains open, thoughtful, and true to herself. And perhaps that's the most meaningful demonstration of self-worth of all. It's a conversation about authenticity, curiosity, spiritual discernment, and recognizing that personal growth isn't always about having the right answers. Sometimes it's about becoming comfortable enough with who you are to stand by your beliefs while remaining open to questioning them. Connect with Kristen Leigh Griffiths: Clarity to Consciousness Podcast: Available on major podcast platforms and YouTube Website: https://claritytoconsciousness.com Personal Website: https://kristenleighgriffiths.com Kristen's bio: Kristen Leigh Griffiths is the host of Clarity to Consciousness, a podcast born from her own curiosity about human consciousness and what it means to live a more intentional, connected life. An award-winning communications and PR professional, Kristen brings years of experience in storytelling, interviewing, and strategic communications to the microphone. Her professional background, combined with a deep fascination with spirituality, personal growth, and the unexplained, gives her a unique ability to make complex or unconventional topics approachable, engaging, and relatable. Kristen isn't here to tell listeners what to believe. She's here to ask the questions, follow the curiosity and explore the possibilities alongside them. Through Clarity to Consciousness, she invites listeners to open their minds, question what they think they know, and discover what becomes possible when we are willing to look at ourselves, and the world around us, a little differently. Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel's endorsement of those claims.

What happens when two people with very different spiritual and political worldviews sit across from each other, ask difficult questions, and actually allow themselves to be affected by the answers? Daniel is joined by Austin Julio Broughton, co-host of Jubilee’s The Split, longtime public speaker, political commentator, debater, content creator, and outspoken Christian whom Daniel first discovered through Jubilee’s Surrounded series. Although the two don’t always fall on the same side politically or spiritually, Daniel was drawn to Austin’s willingness to challenge his own side, resist audience capture, and engage with people he disagrees with in good faith. Austin shares his journey from Christianity to atheism and eventually back to Christianity, explaining why he believes the historical case for Jesus, the Shroud of Turin, philosophy, and his understanding of science give him reason not only to believe in God, but to say that he knows God exists. That distinction immediately catches Daniel’s attention. What does it mean to believe something versus know it? How much evidence is enough before belief becomes knowledge? And at what point does the search for certainty require something evidence alone may never provide: faith? But the questioning doesn’t only go in one direction. Austin challenges Daniel’s belief in reincarnation and raises a question about karma: if someone is born into a completely different body without conscious memories of a previous life, why should that person experience consequences for something another version of them supposedly did? Rather than trying to prove reincarnation, Daniel asks Austin to consider a different framework altogether. What if consciousness isn’t as individual as we assume? What if time isn’t linear? What if our lives aren’t simply occurring one after another, but are somehow part of a much larger picture that neither of them can fully see? And when Austin describes faith as surrendering to God’s plan rather than our own, Daniel pushes back again: Why does it have to be one or the other? Can divine foreknowledge and human free will exist at the same time? As the conversation unfolds, both men find themselves refining the way they explain what they believe. They explore Genesis, evolution, suffering, free will, God’s foreknowledge, biblical history, the preservation of scripture, reincarnation, and the nature of time. But underneath all of it is something more personal: two people testing their convictions without treating disagreement as something that has to produce a winner. And by the end, both appear to leave with something they didn’t have when they walked into the room. Austin offers a perspective on the Bible and the preservation of its message that Daniel had never seriously considered before. It doesn’t give Daniel all the answers or erase his questions. But it affects him deeply enough to change the way he thinks about his own faith. At the same time, Daniel introduces Austin to ways of thinking about reincarnation, consciousness, time, and even the relationship between God’s plan and human choice that push the conversation beyond simple either-or answers. Neither converts the other. Neither needs to. Because maybe expanding faith isn’t about abandoning what you believe. Maybe it’s about allowing someone who sees the world differently to show you a part of it you hadn’t considered before. Connect with Austin Julio Broughton: Instagram: @austinoffscript YouTube: Austin Off Script TikTok: @realaustinoffscript Podcast: Austin Off Script: The Dr. Julio Podcast Jubilee: The Split and Surrounded Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

Five years ago, Timeless Spirituality began with an episode called “The Mirror of Time.” In it, Daniel described the podcast as something that would inevitably become a reflection of his own growth. A place to explore belief without confusing it for fact, to learn through conversations with others, to recognize his own blind spots, and to become more comfortable admitting when he simply didn’t know. Five years later, the mirror is still reflecting. In the Season 5 finale, Daniel looks backward in order to figure out where the show goes next. The episode combines three different moments in the life of Timeless Spirituality: a new and unusually candid reflection from Daniel at 40, the original series premiere recorded at 35, and a conversation from a year ago about his desire to fundamentally change the direction of the podcast. What emerges is a conversation across time between different versions of the same person. Daniel reflects on a recent interview that forced him to question the line between challenging someone’s beliefs and using the power of the microphone irresponsibly. After entering the conversation determined to make his guest defend what he believed, Daniel walked away realizing that somewhere along the way, challenging ideas had begun to feel a little too good. The episode will never be released, but what it revealed to him may help shape everything that comes next. That realization forces Daniel to confront some uncomfortable questions of his own. Can you challenge people without trying to defeat them? When does intellectual curiosity become ego? What responsibility comes with having a platform? And how do you know whether you’re searching for truth or simply enjoying the feeling of being right? Those questions sound remarkably familiar. Because when Daniel listens back to himself at 35, he hears someone already wrestling with belief versus knowing, authenticity, accountability, fear, self-expression, and the tendency to try too hard. A year ago, he was still wrestling with many of those same themes while promising himself that Timeless Spirituality needed to become a place where ideas could be challenged and where he could be challenged in return. Now, he has to figure out what that actually looks like. The Mirror of Time XI: Becoming isn’t simply a look back at five years of Timeless Spirituality. It’s a reminder that growth doesn’t always mean leaving old questions behind. Sometimes we return to them with five more years of experience, a different perspective, and enough humility to realize that we may still not have the answers... The Mirror of Time Series Ep. 1 — The Mirror of Time Ep. 23 — The Mirror of Time II: Transparency Ep. 31 — The Mirror of Time III: Validation Ep. 44 — The Mirror of Time IV: Clarity Ep. 86 — The Mirror of Time V: Vagabond Ep. 93 — The Mirror of Time VI: Sweetness Ep. 94 — The Mirror of Time VII: Metamorphosis Ep. 98 — The Mirror of Time VIII: Generations Ep. 100 — The Mirror of Time IX: Home Ep. 119 — The Mirror of Time X: Dawn Ep. 164 — The Mirror of Time XI: Becoming OCTOBER 11th WORKSHOP: https://newrealitytv.com/events/group-past-life-regression-with-daniel/

What does it mean to reconnect with a part of your identity that has always been yours, but that you never quite felt entitled to claim? Stacy Carlson returns to Timeless Spirituality to share her journey of reconnecting with her Indigenous heritage. Although Stacy is both Hoopa and Hopi, she grew up wrestling with the feeling that she didn't look Indigenous enough to fully belong. Over the last several years, relationships with family members, visits to the Hoopa Valley Reservation, and a deeper exploration of her ancestry have begun to change that. But that exploration has also forced Stacy to confront some painful history. She shares the unexpected encounter that led her to research Indian boarding schools, including the realization that her own great-grandmother had attended one. As a medium, Stacy also describes connecting with an ancestor who she believes experienced one of those schools and asked Stacy to tell her story. From there, Daniel and Stacy explore the lasting effects of historical trauma, missing and murdered Indigenous people, the meaning of "Land Back," and why acknowledging what happened doesn't have to mean remaining trapped in the past. The conversation also wrestles with some uncomfortable questions: What responsibility do people today have for atrocities committed by previous generations? How do we acknowledge privilege without inheriting personal guilt for actions we didn't commit? And after generations of injustice, what does meaningfully moving forward actually look like? For Stacy, reconnecting with her heritage isn't only about uncovering what was taken or grieving what her ancestors endured. It's also about recognizing what survived. Stacy's bio: Stacy Carlson, is a Spiritual Medium/Channel, End-of-life Doula and an Indigenous business owner. She loves connecting with people and helping them connect to their own spiritual entourage (Passed loved ones, spirit babies, Angels, Spirit Guides,  Ancestors etc.)  Instagram & TikTok: @stacy.carlson.soul.speak Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

Does spiritual growth always have to be heavy? Jenny Sherman returns to Timeless Spirituality to talk about her experience with The Expanse Method and, in the process, challenges one of Daniel’s own assumptions about the method he created. The conversation begins with Jenny describing herself as a “creative mystic” and exploring the relationship between creativity, spirituality, skepticism, and the mystery of where inspiration actually comes from. From there, Daniel and Jenny turn to past lives and a question they’ve both become increasingly comfortable leaving unanswered: What exactly are we experiencing during a regression? Jenny has experienced roughly 100 past-life stories through regressions over the years, but she doesn’t necessarily need them to be literal past lives for them to have meaning. They could be memories, archetypes, ancestral material, imagination, something moving through time and space, or something else entirely. For Jenny, the more important question is much simpler: Does the experience help? That perspective made her recent Expanse Method session noticeably different. Without the pressure of having to determine whether something was a “past life,” Jenny found herself approaching the experience with more freedom, curiosity, and playfulness. That catches Daniel somewhat off guard. The Expanse Method was partly created to move away from what Daniel and Jenny jokingly call the “spiritual ick,” or the temptation to leave a profound spiritual experience focused only on the euphoric glow while avoiding the uncomfortable work underneath it. But Jenny’s session raises another possibility: maybe transformation doesn’t always have to hurt. Sometimes the Expanse can be heavy. Sometimes it can confront you with the parts of yourself you would rather avoid. And sometimes, it can be a playground too. Along the way, Daniel reflects on the euphoric “past life regression glow” that followed his own first session, how it contributed to a period of spiritual bypassing, and why he now believes the goal may not be choosing between the “ahh” and the “ugh,” but learning to hold both. Jenny's bio: Jenny is a creative mystic working in multi-media production and also offers spiritual consultations with the help of Tarot and Astrology. She’s also an ME/CFS patient and advocate for disability rights and for complex chronic illness funding for research and treatments.  She is from Los Angeles and is now based in Bath, UK. Website: https://www.JennySRP.com Instagram: @JennySRP @JennySRPVideos Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

What exactly are the Akashic Records, and if everyone experiences them differently, how can we know the information coming through is actually true? Daniel is joined by Stefanie Ruth, host of When Spirit Talks, Reiki practitioner, and Akashic Records reader, for a conversation about spirituality, religion, intuition, and the mysterious idea of a spiritual database containing information about our lives, past lives, and possible futures. Before diving into the Akashic Records, Stefanie shares how her Catholic upbringing shaped her relationship with God, Jesus, and spirituality, and why she eventually moved away from the more rigid aspects of organized religion without abandoning the beliefs that still resonate with her. From there, Daniel and Stefanie explore what the Akashic Records might actually be, how someone accesses them, and whether different people could be receiving different versions of the truth. If the experience is filtered through our own consciousness, where does genuine spiritual information end and imagination begin? And how much confidence should we place in information that can't be objectively verified? Stefanie also shares how she approaches Akashic Records readings, why she believes discernment and personal responsibility matter, and an experience in which information she received about someone's past life appeared to mirror circumstances unfolding in that person's present life. The conversation eventually gets even more philosophical: Are the Akashic Records fixed, or are we constantly contributing to them through our choices? Can the future ever truly be predicted? And if the Akashic Records exist, who or what created them in the first place? Stefanie's links: YouTube & IG @iamstefanieruth Website https://www.liveandbreathereiki.com/ Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

Part two of two.  Where is the line between honoring a group of people and putting them on a pedestal? And can spirituality really be separated from the history of the places and people it claims to honor? In Part 2 of Daniel’s conversation with Marie Major, the discussion takes a more challenging turn as they explore race, racism, privilege, history, and the role these issues should play within the spiritual community. Marie argues that spirituality cannot simply focus on ideas of love, unity, and interconnectedness without also acknowledging the historical injustices experienced by Black and Indigenous people. Daniel agrees on the importance of understanding racism, slavery, colonization, and the systemic barriers that continue to affect marginalized communities, but challenges some of Marie’s conclusions along the way. That leads to one of the central disagreements of the conversation: when Marie speaks about honoring Black people as what she considers the “original blueprint of humanity,” Daniel asks whether honoring a group can cross the line into putting that group on a pedestal. From there, they wrestle with what equality actually looks like, white privilege, historical responsibility, cultural appropriation, and whether someone needs to acknowledge the entire history of a place before speaking about its spiritual significance. The conversation eventually returns to the subject that first brought Marie widespread attention: stargates. Marie explains why she believes a stargate in Iran is spiritually connected to the conflict in the region, while Daniel challenges her on how much someone needs to know about a place’s political and historical context before offering a spiritual interpretation of what is happening there. Despite their disagreements, the conversation ultimately returns to a principle they largely share: acknowledge what you know, acknowledge what you don’t, remain willing to listen, and don’t let the fear of being wrong prevent you from asking difficult questions. Marie's bio: Marie Major is a spiritual author and speaker who helps individuals move from feeling lost in time's illusion to resting in the truth of Divine Timing.  She looks at time not as a line, but as a living energy record—a cosmic story we are meant to co-author. Her work bridges celestial guidance and practical energy medicine, helping others read the rhythm of their soul and align with the universe's flow. Marie believes true manifestation is sacred resonance. It begins when we harmonize our energy with the cosmos, transform old timelines, and consciously collaborate with life's currents. This is where intention meets grace, and longing becomes embodied creation. She is here to help you translate the universe's whispers, dissolve the myth of "too late" or "too soon," and step into the serene power of your own eternal now. Her guiding principle: we create with time, not against it. Instagram and TikTok - @mariemajor_ YouTube - @marie_major Website - mariemajor.love Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

What exactly is a stargate? And when it comes to extraordinary spiritual claims, how do we distinguish belief, intuition, and genuine knowing? Marie Major returns to Timeless Spirituality after gaining attention as the internet’s self-described “Stargate lady” to explain what she believes stargates are, where they exist, and why she believes they matter. She describes them not as physical doorways like something out of science fiction, but as energetic fields connected to nature, ley lines, and specific locations around the world. But Daniel is less interested in simply asking what Marie believes than in asking how she knows. Together, Daniel and Marie explore channeling, intuition, oral traditions, Indigenous stories of portals, and the possibility that spiritual information can change as it’s interpreted and passed from one person to another. If someone sincerely believes the information they’re receiving, does that make the information itself trustworthy? And how much can we ever really claim to know about experiences that can’t be proven?  The conversation eventually ventures into even stranger territory, including the Anunnaki, reptilians, extraterrestrial beings, and Marie’s framework of “remembering” versus “forgetting.” Daniel raises a larger concern along the way: even if someone believes they’re communicating with another being or intelligence, how do they know that what they’re communicating with can be trusted? Marie's bio: Marie Major is a spiritual author and speaker who helps individuals move from feeling lost in time's illusion to resting in the truth of Divine Timing.  She looks at time not as a line, but as a living energy record—a cosmic story we are meant to co-author. Her work bridges celestial guidance and practical energy medicine, helping others read the rhythm of their soul and align with the universe's flow. Marie believes true manifestation is sacred resonance. It begins when we harmonize our energy with the cosmos, transform old timelines, and consciously collaborate with life's currents. This is where intention meets grace, and longing becomes embodied creation. She is here to help you translate the universe's whispers, dissolve the myth of "too late" or "too soon," and step into the serene power of your own eternal now. Her guiding principle: we create with time, not against it. Instagram and TikTok - @mariemajor_ YouTube - @marie_major Website - mariemajor.love Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

What happens when an atheist who doesn't believe in past lives sits down with a past life regressionist? In this installment of Conversations With an Atheist, Daniel is joined by atheist content creator Unquestionable Calvin for a candid—and surprisingly good-humored—conversation about belief, evidence, faith, and how we decide what is actually true. Having grown up Christian, Calvin says that reading and studying the Bible ultimately helped lead him away from Christianity. Today, he challenges religious claims and asks believers to provide evidence for what they believe. But Daniel has questions of his own: What counts as evidence? What's the difference between believing something and knowing it? And should the inability to scientifically measure something be enough to dismiss it altogether? Those questions eventually bring the conversation directly into Daniel's own world. Calvin openly challenges past life regression, questioning its evidence, its potential risks, and whether experiences that seem profound or inexplicable necessarily point to anything supernatural. Daniel, in turn, explains why he doesn't consider a seemingly verified past life definitive proof of reincarnation—and why he believes the value of regression may have more to do with what someone learns from the experience than proving where it came from. From consciousness, souls, the afterlife, and the limits of science to the Bible, miracles, faith, skepticism, and even whether either of them could simply be wrong, the conversation becomes less about proving one worldview and more about what happens when two people with very different beliefs are willing to challenge each other without needing to win. Because perhaps the most interesting place for a believer and an atheist to meet isn't certainty. It's "I don't know." Calvin's bio: Calvin Smith (A.k.a. UnquestionableCalvin) is an atheist content creator based out of Plymouth, Michigan. Calvin has been doing religious deconstruction content for nearly 7 years and has accumulated roughly 250,000 followers on social media. Ranging from live call-in show debates, to video response content, to teaching you how to have conversations with religious people, Calvin will make you question what you never thought you could. Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

Originally aired on the podcast, When Spirit Talks. Why do some people feel instantly familiar? Why do certain relationships seem impossible to walk away from? And if someone really was connected to you in a past life, does that mean they're supposed to remain in your life today? Stefanie Ruth interviews Daniel for a deeper exploration of past lives and the relationships we experience in the present. Together, they discuss repeating relationship patterns, unexplained attraction and irritation, soulmates, twin flames, karma, and the possibility that the same souls may play very different roles across different lifetimes. But the conversation also challenges one of the more seductive ideas in modern spirituality: that a powerful spiritual connection automatically means a relationship is meant to last. Daniel and Stefanie explore how labels like "twin flame" can sometimes keep people attached to unhealthy dynamics—and why understanding a past-life connection should never become an excuse to ignore what's happening right now. They also dive into confirmation bias in past life regression, whether we can ever know that what we're experiencing is "real," the danger of seeing only the parts of a past life that reinforce what we already want to believe, and why Daniel no longer turns to past lives for every difficult situation in his own life. From karma and soul contracts to free will, personal responsibility, and the mysterious nature of time itself, this conversation ultimately comes back to a surprisingly grounded idea: Whatever you may have been to each other then, what matters most is who you are to each other now. Stefanie's links: YouTube & IG @iamstefanieruth Website https://www.liveandbreathereiki.com/ Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

Part two of two. What happens when personal growth crosses the line into psychological control? In this episode, Zack Alexander shares a deeply personal story about participating in what he believes became a cult-like self-development organization. What began as an opportunity for growth slowly revealed patterns of manipulation, pressure, and control that fundamentally changed the way he views the modern self-development industry.  Zack explains the warning signs he observed, why he ultimately chose to speak out despite the personal cost, and how the experience became an unexpected lesson in trusting his own instincts. From there, the conversation expands into the history of Large Group Awareness Trainings, organizations like LifeSpring, recruitment models, trauma-based facilitation techniques, and why some self-development programs can become deeply harmful when there is little accountability or oversight.  Together, Daniel and Zack explore an important question: How do you distinguish genuine personal growth from an organization that demands your identity, your autonomy, or your unquestioning loyalty? This conversation isn't about attacking personal development. It's about learning how to recognize manipulation, protect yourself, and pursue growth without surrendering your ability to think for yourself. Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.

Part one of two.  Why are so many people leaving New Age spirituality for Christianity? Is it a genuine spiritual awakening, a reaction to past harm, or something more complex? Daniel sits down with spiritual mentor Zack Alexander to explore the growing pipeline from New Age spirituality to born-again Christianity. Together, they discuss why people are searching for certainty, how trauma can influence belief systems, and why black-and-white thinking often emerges after painful spiritual experiences.  The conversation also examines the rise of spiritual influencers, the modern guru culture, and the fine line between learning from a teacher and becoming dependent on one. Daniel and Zack explore whether religion itself is the problem—or whether people have a tendency to misuse any system of belief in the pursuit of certainty, identity, or control.  They also tackle an important question facing today's spiritual landscape: Should there be greater accountability for practitioners? From ethical standards to the absence of meaningful oversight, they discuss why the spiritual community may need to rethink how it protects both seekers and practitioners alike.  Disclaimer: The views, opinions, interpretations, and claims expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Daniel or Timeless Spirituality. Guests are responsible for the claims they make, and their appearance on the podcast should not be interpreted as Daniel’s endorsement of those claims.