Advertise on podcast: The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff says the defendant let go of a shopping cart in a supermarket parking lot, and it hit his new car, causing extensive damage. When he confronted the defendant, he allegedly drove off. The plaintiff is suing for repair costs. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s wife caused the damage by squeezing her cart between parked cars. He believes the plaintiff is pinning the blame on him to avoid paying for his own repairs. Then, the plaintiff says she hired the defendant to cater a birthday party that was canceled due to a hurricane. She claims the defendant has been uncooperative in rescheduling the event, so she is suing for a full refund. The defendant says she already spent most of the catering fee on food and supplies in advance. She offered to give the food to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff refused. Plus, the plaintiff says she owns a two-family home and hired the defendants, real estate agents, to find tenants. She claims she set the rent at $1,500, but the tenants placed by the defendants are not paying that amount. She also alleges the tenants bring strange guests and the home now smells like marijuana. She is suing for misrepresentation. The defendants say they’ve worked with over 150 landlords, and this is the first time one has taken legal action over a tenant issue. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to help him find women to date, but the defendant didn't find any viable mates, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he sent him on a date with a great woman, but he just changed his mind about her services for no reason. Besides, the defendant doesn't provide refunds. Then, the plaintiff says the defendant pushed her shopping cart into his car, so he's suing for damages. The defendant argues the shopping cart had a bad wheel and that's not her fault. Plus, the plaintiffs claim their neighbor's toilet overflowed and damaged their belongings. The plaintiffs hired the defendant to restore their belongings, but they ended up all gross and destroyed, so they're suing. The defendant claims he dried and cleaned everything properly. Besides, the plaintiffs signed off on everything. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims her ex-girlfriend borrowed money from her for a car when they were still together. After their breakup, the defendant refused to give back the money, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the reason she needed a car in the first place is because the plaintiff ruined hers. Then, the plaintiff claims her neighbor flooded her apartment, so she's suing for damages. The defendant argues the flooding wasn't that bad, and he even sent a cleaner to help the neighbors. Plus, the plaintiff helped the defendant find homes for kittens. However, the defendant hasn't paid the plaintiff the adoption fees, so she's suing. The defendant insists there was no agreement in place on any adoption fees. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff met the defendant at a pool tournament, and they started dating. The plaintiff alleges the defendant got upset with him one day and keyed his furniture and stole his DVDs, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant denies the allegations and thinks the plaintiff's friends probably did it. Then, the plaintiffs purchased a vehicle from the defendant. They were told it was in pristine condition, but the car was not, so the plaintiffs are suing for false advertisement and repairs. The defendant argues the plaintiffs never complained about the vehicle until eight months later. Plus, the plaintiff rented an apartment to the defendant, but he disappeared and stiffed him on rent, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues he paid the plaintiff everything he owes. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff agreed to rent a room in the defendant's house. The defendant always brought home strange women, so the plaintiff had to move out. The defendant refuses to return her security, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff moved out without any notice and damaged the carpet. Therefore, he had every right to keep the security deposit. Then, the plaintiff stored her televisions at the defendant's house. When she went to retrieve them, the defendant said they were stolen, but the plaintiff believes the defendant had something to do with it, so she's suing. The defendant says he went out of his way to help the plaintiff, and he denies the allegations. Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant damaged his vehicle's bumper outside a hospital, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is making this all up and just assumed he caused the damage. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff alleges the defendant crashed her car into hers, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff is the one who hit her vehicle. Then, the plaintiffs hired the defendant to cater their wedding at a historic museum. However, the plaintiffs say the defendant knew the museum was closing, and they had to hire somone else. The plaintiffs are suing for the return of their deposit. The defendant insists he showed the plaintiffs various locations, and he would have been happy to cater the wedding anywhere. Plus, the plaintiff says her cousin owes her money for work she provided at her day care service, so the plaintiff's suing. The defendant argues she had to fire the plaintiff because she was always late. Besides, the defendant has proof she paid the plaintiff everything she was owed. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims the defendant's dog bit him three times, and his whole life has changed forever, so he's suing. The defendant feels bad for the plaintiff, but she insists the plaintiff went into her home knowing her dog was a bit jittery. Then, the plaintiff gave his cousin, the defendant, a loan before Christmas. However, the defendant failed to pay him back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the money was a gift. Plus, the plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to provide a D.J. for a party. However, the defendant called a day before and said the D.J. got into a car accident. The defendant hasn't provided a refund, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff is the one who canceled hours before the party. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff let her neighbor borrow a special and exclusive edition of Essence magazine. She says the defendant lost it and now owes her for it. She claims the defendant has threatened her, so she’s suing for the cost of the magazine and threatening bodily harm. The defendant argues she had to move out to repaint her apartment, and it must have gotten lost during that. The defendant says the plaintiff left trash in front of her door. She doesn’t get why the plaintiff is suing her for so much money for a $3 magazine. She’s countersuing for aggravation and harassment. Then, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. He says the defendant, who doesn’t have a license, stole his truck and totaled it. He also claims the defendant hacked his email and sent a threatening letter, causing him to get arrested. The plaintiff is suing for the cost of the truck. The defendant argues the truck was hers, so she doesn’t owe him. Plus, the plaintiff and defendant used to be close friends. She registered a car in her name for the defendant, but then he started racking up parking tickets, so she’s suing for what she’s owed. The defendant admits he got parking tickets but claims he gave her money to pay them off. He’s countersuing for towing fees. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs rented a house from the defendant. They claim the house was haunted, so they moved out. They’re suing for real estate agent fees and a security deposit. The defendant argues the plaintiffs complained about a loose light and blowing curtains, but he never had a chance to fix it. Now, his reputation is ruined. He’s countersuing for lost rent and damaged blinds. Then, the plaintiff brings her aunt to court. She claims the defendant lost her expensive designer Christian Louboutin shoes, so she’s suing for the cost of the shoes. The defendant argues she never took the pumps. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff dated the defendant, but they broke up because she cheated on him and threw a statue at his head. They lived together in his family’s building, and they agreed to share expenses. He’s suing for rent, utilities, the cost of a diamond ring, food expenses, and a refrigerator door replacement. The defendant argues the plaintiff kicked her out of the apartment in the middle of the night, and she took him to court for an illegal eviction. She doesn’t think she owes. Then, the defendant hired the plaintiff, a lawyer, to represent her in a civil case. He claims the defendant won’t pay him because they lost, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff guaranteed he would win the case. She appealed the decision and won, so she doesn’t think she owes because she has already paid him a ton of money in fees. Plus, the plaintiff dropped off his designer suit pants and at the defendant’s dry-cleaning business. He says the defendant lost his pants, which makes the rest of the suit unwearable. He’s suing for the cost of a new suit. The defendant argues he tried looking for the pants and he offered the plaintiff money for the missing trousers. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiffs paid the defendant to watch their dogs while they went on vacation. When they went to pick up their pets, the defendant told them one of the dogs got hit by a car and died. They’re suing for the cost of the dog. The defendant argues he offered to refund the dog-sitting fees and buy them a new dog. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to serve a mechanic with legal papers, but the defendant messed up the job. She’s suing for her money back. The defendant argues he did the job just fine and handed over the correct paperwork. Plus, the plaintiff sold a car to the defendant. He claims the defendant wrote a bad check and it bounced. He’s suing for the amount he’s owed. The defendant argues the car died the next died and was a lemon. He refuses to pay the remainder. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff hired the defendants to make her wedding cake. She says the cake looked absolutely terrible and the hotel even refused to serve it because it looked like a health hazard. She’s suing for the cost of the cake and emotional distress. The defendants argue the plaintiff threatened to blow their building up. Then, the plaintiff is a private investigator. He was hired by the defendant to investigate allegations against the defendant’s sons and found proof they were innocent. The plaintiff says he hasn’t been paid, so he’s suing. The defendant argues she paid the plaintiff. Plus, the plaintiff bought a new car and found out he had a lot of unpaid parking tickets. The defendant towed his car, and the plaintiff claims the defendant damaged his car in the process. He’s suing for the damages. The defendant argues he didn’t do anything to the car. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff rented a room in the defendants’ house. He says the defendants didn’t like that he came home late from school, so he moved out. He’s suing for his security deposit and moving fees. The defendants argue the plaintiff wore too much cologne, stunk up the house, and left the place a mess. They’re countersuing for slander. Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to sell hair extensions. She claims the defendant rang up a transaction with a stolen credit card, which cost her thousands of dollars. She’s suing for the cost of the fraudulent transactions. The defendant argues a client used a stolen credit card, so it’s not her fault. Plus, the plaintiff purchased a car from the defendant. She claims the car died the next day and then again a few days after it was fixed. She’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues the car was fine to drive when he sold it to her. He doesn’t think he did anything wrong. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says her friend had her deposit a stolen check in her bank account. The plaintiff is suing for theft and fraud. The defendant argues she didn't tell the plaintiff to do anything and isn't responsible. Then, the plaintiff went to the defendnant's club, but they lost her expensive coat, so she's suing for its value. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn't come back until a week later. They don't keep items overnight. Plus, the plaintiff ordered a custom pool cover for the defendant, but he changed his mind all of the sudden. The defendant refuses to pay for it, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists he never made an actual deal for the plaintiff to buy him a pool cover. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff claims his ex won't return the engagement ring he gave her after they called it quits. The plaintiff is suing for its value. The defendant believes the plaintiff has lost his mind. The defendant claims she supported the plaintiff financially throughout their relationship. Then, the plaintiff planned to share an apartment with the defendant. However, the defendant still owes him for the security deposit, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff tried to put the moves on him, so she couldn't live with him. Plus, the plaintiff claims the defendant placed a drink near his laptop, and it fell. As a result, the computer was destroyed, so the plaintiff is suing for repairs. The defendant claims she had no idea the computer was there because she didn't see it. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices