Advertise on podcast: The Latter Day Lens

Send us Fan Mail What if the Constitution guaranteed every American the right to healthcare? In the second-to-last episode of the original Latter Day Lens, Matt, Shawn, and returning guest Marc tackle healthcare costs, political change, and the personal sacrifices involved in standing up for your beliefs. Matt introduces a proposed constitutional amendment modeled on the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. But there's a twist: rather than requiring government-funded healthcare, he argues that his amendment would protect individual access to medical services by limiting government regulation. Shawn questions whether courts would interpret the amendment that way. Marc unexpectedly argues that a national health service may be the more practical solution. The conversation also explores two other questions: Are young Americans changing the political landscape? The hosts discuss political realignment, dealignment, and whether generational changes can produce lasting political shifts. What can we learn from Dolores Huerta? Her work organizing farmworkers raises difficult questions about moral courage, activism, personal sacrifice, and the risks of speaking out against powerful people. Plus, the hosts debate political favoritism, immigration, and presidential pardons. And Matt announces that the next episode will be the final episode of the original Latter Day Lens, with news about what comes next. Question for listeners: What should a constitutional right to healthcare actually guarantee? Chapter Markers 00:00 — Welcome Back, Marc 00:53 — Our Second-to-Last Episode 01:15 — Listener Mail: Faith, Money & Priestcraft 02:49 — What's Coming Next? 03:00 — Are Young Voters Changing American Politics? 03:47 — Political Realignment vs. Dealignment 07:02 — Marc Challenges Matt 08:18 — Young Voters and Political Geography 09:31 — Does Realignment Have a Latter-day Lens? 11:19 — Immigration, Political Favoritism & Brazil 14:53 — Presidential Pardons and Political Motives 18:45 — Remembering Dolores Huerta 19:54 — Being Anxiously Engaged in a Good Cause 21:11 — The Personal Costs of Activism 24:32 — Public Leadership and Personal Sacrifice 25:24 — Should Victims Speak Out? 28:24 — Can We Fix Healthcare With One Amendment? 29:00 — Matt's Proposed Healthcare Amendment 30:12 — Shawn Challenges the Proposal 31:36 — Is Healthcare Like the Right to Bear Arms? 34:10 — Marc's Unexpected Healthcare Position 34:39 — Should Government Get Out of Medicine? 36:21 — A Free-Market Right to Healthcare 37:06 — Shawn Calls It a Trojan Horse 38:18 — Can AI Replace Some Medical Services? 39:00 — The Cost of American Health Insurance 40:46 — The Abortion-Law Surprise 41:13 — Why Constitutional Amendments Are Complicated 41:40 — Next Week Is Our Final Episode Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail What will the 2026 midterm elections actually change—and what does the Book of Mormon teach about political corruption? Matt and Shawn welcome Levi back for a special midterm election edition of The Latter Day Lens. The hosts begin by examining candidates from both major parties and asking what qualities they value in elected representatives. The discussion explores political independence, bipartisan cooperation, religious convictions, rural representation, housing policy, and the tension between personal principles and party loyalty. Then they revisit their predictions from the 2024 presidential election. What did they expect from the Trump administration on Ukraine, the Middle East, tariffs, and domestic policy? Which predictions held up, and where did they misjudge what would happen? Next comes the central midterm question: How might Congress change if Democrats gain control of one or both chambers—or if Republicans retain control? Matt, Shawn, and Levi explore possible legislative gridlock, congressional investigations, impeachment, immigration policy, and the limits of congressional power when the president and Congress disagree. Finally, the episode turns to Ether 8 and the Book of Mormon's warning about secret combinations. What qualifies as a secret combination? How is it different from ordinary political corruption? And what responsibilities do citizens have when they believe powerful people are protecting one another from accountability? The conversation ends with an unexpected historical example from Liberia and a discussion of how ordinary people can organize to challenge entrenched power. Question for listeners: How should people respond when loyalty to a political party conflicts with their personal principles? Join the conversation at LatterDayLens.com. 00:00 — Midterm Election Special 01:01 — Finding Candidates Across Party Lines 01:41 — Levi's Republican Selections 06:09 — Shawn's Test for Independent Politicians 07:55 — Susan Collins and Bipartisanship 09:45 — Thomas Massie and Party Loyalty 11:47 — Democratic Candidates Worth Discussing 13:16 — Religious Values and Political Priorities 16:24 — Housing, Rural Communities, and Representation 18:33 — Revisiting Our 2024 Election Predictions 19:30 — Ukraine, Russia, and the Middle East 24:02 — Tariffs and Domestic Policy Predictions 25:06 — Matt Admits He Was Wrong 27:31 — What if Democrats Control Congress? 29:43 — Impeachment and Congressional Oversight 31:29 — What Could Congress Actually Accomplish? 33:23 — Ukraine and U.S. Foreign Policy 35:35 — Immigration, Asylum, and ICE 38:16 — Is Political Gridlock a Good Thing? 39:09 — What if Republicans Retain Congress? 41:37 — Ether 8 and Secret Combinations 43:22 — Can the Constitution Stop Corruption? 45:03 — January 6 and Constitutional Safeguards 49:41 — What Defines a Secret Combination? 51:45 — Is Corruption the Same as Conspiracy? 54:02 — How Do We Stop Secret Combinations? 55:07 — The Women Who Helped End Liberia's Civil War 57:25 — Collective Action and the 4B Movement 58:02 — The Book of Mormon's Warning for Today 59:10 — Final Thoughts Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Is it wrong to make money preaching the gospel? And when does religious content become priestcraft? Matt and Shawn welcome Melanie back to The Latter Day Lens for a surprisingly personal debate about faith, money, Christian influencers, and the growing business of religious self-help. A report about Life Surge, a company that attracts Christians to inspirational events and sells expensive coaching programs, raises a difficult question: Can someone sincerely promote faith while also trying to make a profit? Melanie argues that mixing religious teaching with personal enrichment creates serious spiritual risks. Shawn asks whether charging for faith-promoting content might actually allow creators to reach more people. Matt shares his own experience selling business coaching and explains why the work eventually made him uncomfortable. Then the conversation turns to two other big questions: Can sports bring Americans together? New research suggests that shared team loyalties can reduce political hostility. But Matt wonders whether sports fandom is actually one of Satan's counterfeits of meaningful human identity. Melanie pushes back. Is improving public education a religious responsibility? Matt, Shawn, and Melanie debate tutoring, teacher salaries, early childhood education, government spending, and whether society is investing enough in helping children learn. Plus, Matt and Shawn discuss the approaching end of The Latter Day Lens—and hint that something different may come next. In This Episode Melanie returns to The Latter Day LensWhat comes after Matt leaves the podcast?Sports fandom and political polarizationBYU–Utah football rivalriesIs sports fandom one of Satan's counterfeits?Moses 1 and our identity as children of GodCan shared interests help us love our neighbors?Education as a religious responsibilitySmall-group tutoring and the science of readingUniversal pre-K and teacher compensationWhy talented students may avoid teaching careersGovernment spending and educational prioritiesSchool accountability and academic standardsLife Surge and Christian financial coachingReligious entrepreneurship and priestcraftCan Christian influencers make money ethically?Matt's experience selling business coachingShawn's Mission Stories podcastThe spiritual risks of wealth and popularityHow personal revelation informs financial decisionsThe Question We Want You to Answer When does making money from religion become priestcraft? Should religious educators, authors, podcasters, and other creators earn money from their work? Is the important distinction how much money they earn, how they earn it, or what they intend to accomplish with it? We'd love to hear your thoughts. Chapter Markers 00:00 — Welcome Back, Melanie 00:23 — Is The Latter Day Lens Ending? 02:25 — Can Sports Heal Political Divisions? 03:49 — The Problem With Sports Rivalries 04:48 — Is Sports Fandom a Counterfeit of Satan? 06:16 — Moses 1 and Our True Identity 07:26 — Melanie Defends Sports Fandom 10:58 — Would the World Be Better Without Superpowers? 13:59 — Power, Dependence, and International Relations 17:03 — What Is Righteous Dominion? 18:18 — Canada and the Power of Cooperation 20:55 — Why Younger Americans View Foreign Affairs Differently 23:16 — Is Education a Religious Responsibility? 25:46 — Intelligence and Eternal Progression 27:46 — Why Talented People Avoid Teaching 29:16 — Are We Spending Enough on Education? 32:06 — Education, Medicare, and the Military 34:41 — Which Education Reforms Actually Work? 36:14 — Matt's Plan to Fix Public Education 37:41 — The National Debt and Future Generations 40:00 — When Faith Becomes a Business 41:57 — Is Making Money From Religion Wrong? 43:16 — Should Christian Influencers Get Paid? 45:18 — When Does Money Corrupt Good Intentions? 47:37 — Can Profit Help Spread the Gospel? 49:13 — How Much Money Is Too Much? 50:44 — Shawn's Mission Stories Dilemma 51:39 — Final Thoughts Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Why Do Smart People Believe Conspiracy Theories?Why do intelligent, educated people sometimes believe things that aren't supported by evidence? And is believing a conspiracy theory necessarily a bad thing? Matt and Shawn welcome David back to The Latter Day Lens for a conversation about political identity, election predictions, conspiracy theories, religious faith, and the rights of Americans living in U.S. territories. The conversation begins with a thought-provoking listener observation: War might actually be worse than hell. The listener reasons that people suffering in hell are understood to be accountable for their actions, while war inflicts terrible suffering on innocent people. Matt, Shawn, and David consider the implications before Matt takes the discussion in an unexpected direction: Would watching people suffer in hell be an appropriate form of entertainment? From there, the conversation turns to politics. What Do Left and Right Actually Mean? Across the world, political movements are commonly described as left-wing or right-wing. But those labels don't necessarily mean the same thing everywhere. Matt explains how political scientists use surveys to measure ideological self-placement and how voters relate their political identities to political parties. Shawn traces the familiar left-right terminology to the French Revolution, while David raises a fascinating historical question: Was Abraham Lincoln a radical or a conservative? Lincoln's opposition to slavery and defense of the Union illustrate how political labels depend on historical circumstances. The conversation then becomes theological. Should Latter-day Saints align themselves with worldwide movements of the political left or right? Or is the gospel compatible with people who hold a wide variety of political beliefs? Matt argues that political commitments and religious commitments will inevitably come into tension at times, regardless of ideology. The discussion explores what happens when political convictions conflict with religious teachings—and how believers can navigate those disagreements. Are Election Predictions Harmful? Political polls, forecasting models, and prediction markets increasingly shape public expectations about elections. But what happens when a forecast assigns a candidate a high probability of victory and the candidate loses? Matt questions whether election predictions can create an exaggerated sense of certainty about outcomes that are inherently uncertain. Shawn and David challenge the argument, asking whether forecasts are genuinely harmful and whether restricting their publication would create greater problems for freedom of expression. The conversation considers voter turnout, public confidence, social pressure, and the difference between a forecast and an actual election result. Why Do We Believe Conspiracy Theories? This is where the conversation takes its most personal turn. The anniversary of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks leads Matt to introduce claims about what Israeli officials may have known before the attacks. He also mentions longstanding conspiracy theories surrounding Pearl Harbor and September 11. The hosts do not establish those claims as facts. Instead, they use them to explore a psychological question: Why are conspiracy theories so appealing? David discusses research suggesting that conspiracy beliefs can provide explanations for disturbing events, particularly when people feel powerless or unable to influence what happens around them. Shawn connects the discussion to epistemology: the study of knowledge and how we determine what is true. He argues that people need reliable methods for evaluating evidence rather than simply accepting explanations that feel convincing. Matt takes a different position. He wonders whether believing an unproven theory is necessarily harmful, especially when the belief doesn't seem to affect anyone else's life. Then he offers a particularly memorable example. Matt explains that he has long believed silk boxers can cause infertility—largely because Kramer said something about it on Seinfeld. David challenges whether Matt truly believes this or simply enjoys entertaining an unusual explanation. The conversation moves from there to a much more serious issue: What happens when people continue believing something even after encountering substantial evidence against it? Matt discusses how people defend deeply held beliefs, while Shawn emphasizes the importance of faith, evidence, and the spiritual process of seeking truth. The hosts also consider how religious belief differs from conspiracy thinking, and whether an explanation can feel meaningful without being supported by reliable evidence. Should Puerto Rico Become a State? The final discussion begins with an unexpected observation from General Conference. President Henry B. Eyring welcomed choir members from numerous countries, including Puerto Rico. Matt points out that Puerto Rico is not an independent country. It is a U.S. territory, and people born there are generally U.S. citizens. Yet residents of Puerto Rico do not have the same federal voting representation as residents of the 50 states. That raises a question about equality, citizenship, representation, and self-determination. Should residents of U.S. territories be offered a binding choice between statehood and independence? Or should the current territorial arrangements remain available when residents have different preferences about their political future? David discusses the historical transitions of Alaska and Hawaii from territories to states, while Shawn raises questions about whether the people of Puerto Rico have sufficiently expressed a preference for changing their status. Matt argues that the central issue is not which status Puerto Rico should choose, but whether territorial residents have meaningful control over the decision. The conversation ends with a familiar Latter Day Lens disagreement: What does it really mean for a people to govern themselves? In This Episode Is war worse than hell?What left-wing and right-wing mean around the worldAbraham Lincoln and changing political identitiesPolitical ideology and Latter-day Saint discipleshipElection polls, prediction markets, and voter expectationsThe psychology of conspiracy theoriesPearl Harbor, September 11, and October 7 conspiracy claimsEpistemology and the search for truthFaith, evidence, and personal revelationMatt's Seinfeld-inspired infertility theoryWhy people resist changing their beliefsPuerto Rican citizenship and representationStatehood, independence, and territorial statusAlaska, Hawaii, and the history of statehoodThe Declaration of Independence and self-governmentThe Question We Want You to Answer How do you distinguish healthy skepticism from conspiracy thinking? Is it enough to believe something because it feels right or provides a convincing explanation? What responsibility do we have to reconsider our beliefs when we encounter contradictory evidence? Send us your thoughts at LatterDayLens.com. We may discuss your responses on a future episode. The Latter Day Lens explores politics, religion, culture, and current events through a Latter-day Saint lens. Matt and Shawn don't always agree—and that's the point. Our goal isn't to tell you what to think. It's to ask better questions. Chapters 00:00 — Welcome Back, David 00:36 — Is War Worse Than Hell? 02:55 — What Do Left and Right Mean? 05:11 — The French Revolution and Political Labels 09:23 — Was Abraham Lincoln a Radical? 10:55 — Does the Gospel Favor a Political Ideology? 13:23 — When Politics Conflicts With Faith 15:35 — Are Election Predictions Harmful? 17:58 — Forecasts and Election Legitimacy 19:34 — Should Election Polling Be Restricted? 21:25 — Do Predictions Discourage Voting? 24:05 — Why Do People Believe Conspiracy Theories? 26:02 — The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs 27:08 — Faith, Epistemology, and Truth 29:26 — Can Conspiracy Thinking Be Harmful? 31:26 — Matt's Seinfeld Conspiracy Theory 33:13 — Why Evidence Doesn't Always Change Minds 35:57 — Is Puerto Rico Being Treated Unequally? 39:36 — Statehood, Independence, or Status Quo? 41:10 — What Did Puerto Rico Vote For? 43:09 — What Does Self-Determination Mean? 47:03 — The Economic Consequences of Statehood 49:25 — Do Nonbinding Votes Really Matter? 50:10 — Final Thoughts Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail What happens when conservative principles collide with government power? This week on The Latter Day Lens, Matt and Shawn are joined by Porter for a wide-ranging conversation about gambling, government regulation, college athletes, modesty, war, presidential power, Christmas music, and what it means to live your faith in the real world. Should the Government Regulate College Sports? The U.S. Senate has just passed the bipartisan Protect College Sports Act, 77–22. The legislation would establish federal rules governing name, image, and likeness compensation, transfers, revenue sharing, athlete protections, and other aspects of college athletics. It now heads to the House. Supporters argue that Congress needs to bring stability to a chaotic college-sports environment and protect athletes and less-profitable Olympic sports. Critics—including the NAACP—argue that the legislation gives too much power to universities and athletic conferences while restricting athletes' ability to bargain collectively. So here's the question: Should the federal government regulate college sports at all? And more broadly, should a supposedly conservative Republican Congress be telling young adults how much money they can earn, where they can transfer, and how they can use their name and image? Is Gambling Morally Wrong—and Should Government Ban It? President D. Todd Christofferson recently spoke directly about the explosion of gambling, calling gambling morally wrong and warning that it can become consuming and crowd out productive activities. He emphasized the difference between contributing value through work and gaining at another person's expense. Read the Church's General Conference coverage of his remarks. That raises a fascinating political question: When the Church teaches that something is morally wrong, should Latter-day Saints try to make it illegal? Matt thinks government sometimes has a legitimate role in restricting harmful behavior. Shawn is much more skeptical of using the government to enforce morality. The conversation gets even more complicated when they discuss prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket, which have increasingly blurred the line between gambling and financial markets. And then the question gets very uncomfortable: If gambling should be illegal because it harms society, what else should be illegal? Does the Church Have a Modesty Standard for Athletic Clothing? A controversy involving BYU cross-country runners raises another familiar question: Does Church modesty guidance apply to athletic clothing? The conversation takes an unexpected turn as Porter digs into decades of Church teaching about modesty and discovers a significant shift from very specific standards toward a more principle-based approach. The Church's current teaching emphasizes honoring the body as a sacred gift and allowing the Spirit to guide decisions about clothing and appearance. A 2017 Church publication also explicitly taught children to be kind rather than judge others for how they dress. Read "Modesty Means..." from The Friend. So what changed? And perhaps more importantly: Is it our job to decide whether someone else is sufficiently modest? Is American Military Power Being Used for Profit? The conversation then takes a dramatic turn toward Venezuela. Matt, Shawn, and Porter debate the morality of American military intervention and the expanding role of U.S. economic interests in Venezuela's oil industry. The U.S. government has secured rights to a 35% interest in North American Blue Energy Partners, a company planning a massive expansion of Venezuelan oil production. S&P Global explains the agreement and its proposed investment. The arrangement has already drawn questions about the relationship between military power, economic interests, and Venezuela's political future. Is the use of American military force morally justified if it protects American interests? What about regime change? And what happens when the military becomes a tool for economic policy? Porter takes a particularly strong position: military force should be used only when it is necessary to prevent an immediate loss of human life—and even then, military action may not be the best tool. How Much War Is Too Much? The Venezuela discussion becomes a broader conversation about Iraq, Iran, Ukraine, September 11, and the moral limits of military intervention. What does it mean to "renounce war and proclaim peace" while still believing that nations have a right to defend themselves? Does Captain Moroni's example justify preparing for war? Can a nation morally use violence to prevent a future threat? And is there a point where defending freedom actually destroys the very freedoms you're trying to protect? When Is It Okay to Start Playing Christmas Music? Finally, the most important question of the episode. A Utah radio station began playing Christmas music on September 28—barely a week after the beginning of fall. The Salt Lake Tribune covered KLO's unusually early Christmas launch. Matt has a problem with this. He argues that starting Christmas music too early turns Christmas into a commercial holiday centered on shopping, nostalgia, Santa, and Mariah Carey rather than Jesus Christ. Shawn isn't buying it. Maybe even cheesy Christmas music helps create a culture of joy, nostalgia, generosity, and—eventually—thoughts about Jesus. So we settle the question once and for all: When is it morally acceptable to start playing Christmas music? And yes, Matt really does become Charlie Brown. Chapters 00:00 — Welcome Back, Porter 00:46 — Should Gambling Be Illegal? 02:30 — Victor Wembanyama Takes a Stand on Gambling 03:40 — What Should Government Make Illegal? 06:00 — Can Government Regulate Morality? 09:35 — Should the Federal Government Regulate College Sports? 10:23 — How Much Should College Athletes Be Allowed to Earn? 11:36 — Are Universities Becoming For-Profit Institutions? 12:39 — Why Is Congress Doing This Right Now? 14:39 — Does the Church Have a Modesty Standard? 16:20 — Is Judging Someone's Clothing Pharisaical? 17:04 — What the Church Used to Teach About Modesty 20:48 — Why Did Modesty Standards Change? 22:59 — Does Clothing Reveal Your Character? 25:24 — Where Should We Draw the Line? 26:45 — Should You Question the Handbook? 30:15 — Can You Judge Someone's Intentions? 31:58 — Is American Power Being Used for Profit in Venezuela? 33:54 — Is Military Force Ever Morally Justified? 36:05 — Can You Prevent a Future War by Starting One? 38:21 — What Has American Intervention Cost? 40:00 — When Is War Actually Justified? 41:44 — Has the Republican Party Lost Its Way? 43:09 — How Early Is Too Early for Christmas Music? 45:05 — Is Early Christmas Music Ruining Christmas? 46:39 — Matt Becomes Charlie Brown 47:04 — Is Christmas Music Good Even When It's Commercialized? 49:11 — Can Christmas Music Point People Toward Christ? Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail What should a faithful Latter-day Saint do when Church leaders take a political position—and you aren't sure you agree? That question drives one of our most candid conversations yet. The United Nations, Ezra Taft Benson, and Prophetic Counsel We begin with the United Nations. New Gallup polling across 137 countries finds that 50% of adults worldwide approve of the UN's performance, compared with 26% who disapprove. But Latter-day Saints have an interesting history with the organization. During the 1960s, Ezra Taft Benson was a fierce critic of the United Nations, warning about communism, threats to national sovereignty, and what he saw as parallels with the Book of Mormon's warnings about secret combinations. Today, the Church works with and supports UN organizations. So what changed? And how should Latter-day Saints understand political counsel from Church leaders decades later? Are some prophetic teachings intended for a particular time and circumstance? When Church Leaders Tell You How to Vote Then the question gets much more personal. Idaho's Proposition 1 would overturn the state's strict abortion ban. Supporters are making an unusual argument: Idaho's abortion law has contributed to an exodus of obstetricians and reduced access to healthcare for women. Opponents dispute that interpretation and argue that the state's abortion restrictions protect unborn life. Then Church leaders entered the debate. In a letter sent to Idaho congregations, the Area Presidency announced the Church's opposition to the initiative and urged members to vote against it. Does an Area Presidency speak for the Church? And what should a faithful Latter-day Saint do if personal study, prayer, and conscience seem to point in another direction? Matt and Shawn revisit the experiences of Latter-day Saints during California's Proposition 8 campaign and discuss Harry Reid's disagreement with then-Apostle Russell M. Nelson over a proposed constitutional amendment defining marriage. What does it actually mean to sustain Church leaders? Is obedience always the same thing as agreement? Where does personal revelation fit? And is there a faithful way to disagree? Should We Put Weapons in Space? Then the conversation moves from the ballot box to outer space. The U.S. military has acknowledged possessing operational weapons in orbit, raising new questions about an arms race beyond Earth's atmosphere. The potential consequences go far beyond military competition. Destroying satellites can create fast-moving orbital debris, potentially producing cascading collisions—the dreaded "Kessler Effect"—that could threaten the satellites modern life increasingly depends upon. Matt argues that the scriptural command to "renounce war and proclaim peace" should make Latter-day Saints deeply skeptical of expanding warfare into another arena. Shawn isn't convinced. If potential adversaries develop these capabilities, does a nation have a moral obligation to prepare to defend itself? Does Captain Moroni provide a model for military preparedness—or is there a point at which preparing for war actually makes war more likely? The Big Question: Is Language Divine? Finally, things get unexpectedly philosophical. A study involving 228 languages found little evidence that some languages are inherently more beautiful than others. Listeners' preferences appeared to be influenced much more by things like the speaker's voice and familiarity with a language. That raises a very Latter-day Lens question. President Dieter F. Uchtdorf has jokingly praised German as a heavenly language, and most of us probably have languages we find particularly beautiful. But is there actually something divine about language? If we could hear Adam and Eve speaking the pure Adamic language, would something about it sound familiar—or even beautiful—to everyone? Or would we still prefer the languages we already know? The discussion eventually expands into music, art, the golden ratio, resurrection, and an even bigger question: Are beauty, language, and music merely human creations, or are they expressions of eternal principles? Chapters 00:00 — Mailbag, Key & Peele, and Political Outrage 05:10 — Do We Need Political Enemies? 08:28 — Ezra Taft Benson vs. the United Nations 10:55 — Can Prophetic Political Counsel Expire? 13:23 — When Church Leaders Misunderstand an Issue 15:20 — Study It Out, Decide, and Pray 17:40 — When Church Leaders Tell You How to Vote 19:28 — Does an Area Presidency Speak for the Church? 21:41 — Prop 8, Steve Young & Political Disagreement 22:49 — Harry Reid vs. Russell M. Nelson 23:33 — Does Sustaining Mean Obeying? 26:33 — Personal Revelation vs. Church Counsel 29:57 — Can You Criticize a Church Political Position? 31:16 — Do Church Leaders Learn Too? 33:56 — Should America Put Weapons in Space? 37:09 — "Renounce War" vs. National Defense 41:15 — What Would Captain Moroni Do? 44:06 — Are Some Languages More Beautiful? 46:10 — Is Beauty Objective? 48:57 — Was the Adamic Language Divine? 51:29 — Is Music Eternal? 53:09 — Shawn's Case for Eternal Beauty 55:21 — Final Thoughts Join the Conversation Here's the question we especially want to hear your answer to: If Church leaders publicly ask members to support or oppose a political measure, what does sustaining those leaders require? Does it mean voting as requested? Does it mean taking their counsel seriously while still seeking your own answer through study and prayer? And what should a faithful Latter-day Saint do if those two things appear to lead in different directions? Send us your thoughts at LatterDayLens.com. We may discuss your response on a future episode. The Latter Day Lens explores the questions Latter-day Saints argue about privately—but rarely discuss publicly. Faithful, intellectually honest, and no requirement that Matt and Shawn agree. Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Is the Book of Mormon socialist? That question launches Matt, Shawn, and Levi into a much bigger debate about capitalism, democratic socialism, wealth inequality, agency, public education, corruption, and how far government should go in encouraging people to make good choices. But first: Is America's government becoming too corrupt? A new Gallup survey finds that 89% of U.S. adults believe government corruption is widespread—the highest level Gallup has recorded in two decades. Matt turns to King Mosiah. Mosiah argued that government should operate according to the “voice of the people” and established a system of judges rather than continuing Nephite monarchy. Would greater direct accountability to voters reduce corruption today? Should Americans directly elect more officials—including judges and presidents—or is one of the strengths of the Constitution precisely that different institutions respond to voters at different speeds? Levi argues for what he calls a heterogeneous government: a House of Representatives that responds relatively quickly to changes in public opinion, a Senate designed to move more slowly, and courts insulated from immediate political pressure. Matt sees a downside: the farther an official gets from direct voter accountability, the easier corruption may become. That leaves an uncomfortable question: How much democracy is too much democracy? Then the conversation turns to economics. Matt begins with the recent experiences of the United States and Argentina and asks whether contemporary conservative economic policies have actually improved everyday life for ordinary people. But the conversation quickly becomes theological. Matt compares elements of the Democratic Socialists of America platform with teachings in the Book of Mormon and argues that scriptural teachings about poverty, inequality, work, and care for the poor can sound surprisingly compatible with some policies associated with the economic left. Shawn strongly disagrees with equating those teachings with socialism. The Book of Mormon certainly condemns pride, exploitation, neglect of the poor, and excessive attachment to wealth. But does that tell us anything about what government should do? Then Matt brings up Fourth Nephi. After Christ's ministry among the Nephites, the people had “all things common among them,” and the society was characterized by extraordinary unity. Is that evidence for a more egalitarian economic system? Shawn identifies what may be the crucial distinction: they chose it. Can government create a Christlike society by compelling people to share? Or does using coercion to produce an outwardly righteous result undermine the agency that makes the action righteous in the first place? Levi reframes the economic question another way. If two different sets of economic policies produce roughly similar levels of economic growth, but one provides more healthcare, education, environmental protection, or assistance to the poor, why wouldn't society choose those additional benefits? That leads Matt to the economic outcome he would most like to recover: a society where a household can realistically choose to live on one income, allowing either parent to remain home if the family wants that arrangement. And that leads directly to education. International educational performance has continued to decline. OECD's new PISA 2025 results report historically low average mathematics and reading performance across OECD countries, with reading down 28 points since 2015 and mathematics down 22. The OECD also warns that excessive or poorly guided use of digital devices and AI can undermine learning. Meanwhile, only 32% of Americans say they are satisfied with the quality of K-12 education in the United States, the lowest result in Gallup's 27-year trend. Matt sees a connection to the previous episode's discussion of federalism. Are American schools too locally controlled? If individual communities determine educational priorities, a dominant local faction can place enormous pressure on schools. One community may emphasize academics. Another may care more about athletics, extracurricular activities, religion, ideology, or simply keeping parents happy. Would national standards force competing factions to compromise until only the things Americans broadly agree children should learn survive? Shawn sees the opposite danger. Centralization means that when government makes a bad decision, everyone is stuck with it. Local control gives families at least some opportunity to choose communities that better reflect their priorities. Then comes the episode's biggest question: Should government ever try to make us better people? Prohibition becomes the case study. Alcohol produces genuine external harms. But the Constitution of the Church's political theology, particularly Doctrine and Covenants 134, also emphasizes freedom of conscience and warns government against suppressing the freedom of the soul. So where is the line? Matt introduces the idea of a government nudge. Rather than simply banning something, government can make desirable behavior easier and undesirable behavior harder. Levi takes the idea further: What if buying alcohol required a license? Someone convicted of drunk driving or alcohol-related domestic abuse might temporarily lose the ability to legally purchase it. Shawn sees the danger immediately. A “nudge” seems attractive when government is nudging people toward your values. What happens when the political majority changes? The conversation turns to government incentives surrounding marriage and same-sex relationships as an example of how policies designed to encourage behavior one majority regards as desirable can burden people who do not share the majority's values. That produces the central tension of the episode: Government inevitably influences behavior. But when does influence become coercion? Can government discourage harmful choices while still respecting agency? Or should government remain neutral and leave persuasion about morality to families, churches, communities, and individuals? And, naturally, the conversation ends with the policy question America has somehow failed to confront: Should Broncos fans have to pay an extra tax? In this episode: • Why 89% of Americans perceive widespread government corruption • King Mosiah and the “voice of the people” • Direct democracy vs. representative institutions • Why different branches of government move at different speeds • Accountability and political corruption • Capitalism, socialism, and the Book of Mormon • The Democratic Socialists of America platform • Poverty and wealth inequality in scripture • Fourth Nephi and “all things common” • Can government force righteousness? • Property rights and agency • The one-income family • Why educational performance is declining internationally • AI and digital distraction in schools • Local control of American education • Federalism and national education standards • Prohibition • Alcohol, agency, and public harm • Government “nudges” • When incentives become coercion • Doctrine and Covenants 134 • And an entirely reasonable tax on Broncos fans 00:00 — Welcome Back, Levi 05:28 — Is American Government Too Corrupt? 07:17 — Would King Mosiah Elect Everyone? 11:59 — Majority Rule vs. Minority Rule 13:02 — Why Government Should Move at Different Speeds 15:03 — Does Accountability Reduce Corruption? 19:33 — Has Conservative Economics Failed? 25:37 — Is the Book of Mormon Socialist? 29:07 — Fourth Nephi: “All Things Common” 30:24 — Can Government Force Righteousness? 33:02 — Why Not Provide More If We Can? 35:27 — Can One Income Support a Family? 36:59 — Are American Schools Failing? 40:51 — Is Local Control Hurting Education? 43:50 — Would National Standards Work Better? 48:19 — Prohibition, Alcohol & Agency 51:34 — Does Agency Include Bad Choices? 52:03 — Can Government Nudge Us Toward Good? 53:05 — Should You Need a License to Buy Alcohol? 54:16 — Can Government Make People Righteous? 57:55 — When Does a Nudge Become Coercion? 1:02:13 — Tax the Broncos Fans? Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Why are Latter-day Saints and white evangelical Christians beginning to look different politically? Matt, Shawn, and guest Clayton examine new polling on Mormon politics, Christian nationalism, American power, and whether the increasingly global nature of the Church is changing the way Latter-day Saints see America and the world. They also ask whether modern politics punishes honest politicians, how to respect a political office when you distrust the person occupying it, whether federalism is actually a gospel principle, and what Captain Moroni's use of spies, ambushes, and “stratagem” might teach us about preemptive war. The Question We Want You to Answer Alma 43 says Captain Moroni “thought it no sin” to defend the Nephites by stratagem. Why does Mormon tell us that? Was Moroni's use of deception justified specifically because the Nephites were defending themselves? Can nations today morally use similar tactics to prevent an attack before it occurs? Or does Christian discipleship demand a much stronger presumption against preemptive force? Send us your thoughts at LatterDayLens.com. We may discuss your response on a future episode. In this episode: • Spencer Cox, Jon Stewart, and political honesty • Whether modern politics punishes honest politicians • Respecting an office while distrusting its occupant • Why local politicians may face different incentives • Florida, hurricanes, zoning, and local control • Federalism and the tyranny of the majority • Property rights vs. community standards • Clayton's experience in local government • Is the LDS Church organized according to federalist principles? • Why Latter-day Saints and evangelicals may be diverging politically • Christian nationalism and LDS political culture • Missionary work and the globalization of the Church • The Constitution and American exceptionalism • Captain Moroni and military “stratagem” • Spies, ambushes, and military deception • Preemptive war and September 11 • “Renounce war, proclaim peace” Chapter Markers 00:00 — Can an Honest Politician Survive? 00:50 — Welcome & Meet Clayton Keller 03:18 — Are Arbitrary Rules Meant to Be Broken? 09:03 — Should Cities Have More Power? 13:21 — The Dark Side of Local Control 16:24 — Property Rights vs. Your Neighbors 20:37 — Is Federalism a Gospel Principle? 21:28 — Can We Trust a Dishonest Politician? 28:17 — Respect the Office, Distrust the Person? 29:30 — Spencer Cox and Honest Politics 31:46 — Why Local Politicians Are Different 33:26 — Latter-day Saints vs. Evangelicals 38:24 — Does a Global Church Change Politics? 40:57 — The Constitution Without Nationalism 44:09 — Has LDS Political Culture Changed? 45:37 — Captain Moroni and Military Deception 49:30 — 9/11 and Preemptive War 53:27 — Is Dishonesty Ever Moral in War? 55:59 — Renounce War, Proclaim Peace 57:14 — Final Thoughts The Question We Want You to Answer Alma 43 says Captain Moroni “thought it no sin” to defend the Nephites by stratagem. Why does Mormon tell us that? Was Moroni's use of deception justified specifically because the Nephites were defending themselves? Can nations today morally use similar tactics to prevent an attack before it occurs? Or does Christian discipleship demand a much stronger presumption against preemptive force? Send us your thoughts at LatterDayLens.com. We may discuss your response on a future episode. Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Is cheating actually a sin—or are some rules just arbitrary? Matt says that even after explicitly telling his BYU–Idaho students how they may and may not use ChatGPT, about 20% still cross the line. Shawn asks a more uncomfortable question: If a professor makes an arbitrary rule, is breaking it actually immoral? That launches a debate about AI, plagiarism, the Honor Code, obedience, honesty, and what actually makes cheating wrong. Matt also confesses that he cheated in high school—and tells the story of the BYU professor who completely changed how he thought about integrity. Then Matt and Shawn turn the Latter Day Lens toward three more questions: Should Christians use Jesus to justify healthcare policy? James Talarico does. Matt likes Talarico but argues that using Jesus to validate our political positions may actually cheapen Christianity. Should Latter-day Saints abandon political parties? Charles Barkley says Americans are being manipulated into fighting one another. Matt and Shawn agree with his diagnosis—but not necessarily his solution. Can government actually give us liberty? Drawing on Viktor Frankl, scripture, and the American founding, Matt and Shawn distinguish freedom from liberty and ask whether even an oppressive government can take true liberty away. And somehow Naked and Afraid becomes an argument about federalism. Chapters 00:00 Welcome to The Latter Day Lens 03:46 Women and Church Culture 06:51 Is Cheating a Sin? 12:42 When Rules Become Dishonesty 18:57 Students Cheating With AI 21:17 Matt Cheated in High School 24:51 Jesus and Healthcare 33:15 Jesus in Politics 35:40 Charles Barkley on Politics 39:26 Latter-day Saints and Parties 46:12 Freedom vs. Liberty 47:50 Viktor Frankl's Last Freedom 52:21 Government and Morality 54:15 Naked and Afraid Government 58:56 More Federalism? 1:00:20 Final Thoughts Question for you: Where do you draw the line between breaking a rule and being dishonest? Is using AI on an assignment cheating if the student actually learns the material? Send us your thoughts at LatterDayLens.com. We may share your response on a future episode. The Latter Day Lens explores the questions Latter-day Saints argue about privately—but rarely discuss publicly. Faithful, intellectually honest, and no requirement that Matt and Shawn agree. Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail In this episode of The Latter-day Lens, Matt, Shawn, and guest co-host Levi open with a personal announcement regarding the future of the show and Matt's timeline for stepping away. From there, the panel dives into four distinct issues spanning governance, ethics, academia, and church trends: Federal Data and Public Good: Following meteorologist John Morales's warning about NOAA budget cuts and lost weather balloon data, the team debates whether the federal government has a moral duty to fund public data collection or if private industry could handle it better.Civilian Casualties and the Ethics of War: After reports on rollbacks to the Pentagon's Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Framework, the hosts debate the moral obligations of nations during military conflict.DEI, Academic Scrutiny, and Institutional Standards: Exploring the tragic story of Cambridge sociologist Jason Arday alongside broader critiques from Roland Fryer, the panel examines the nuances of DEI policies, double standards, and how merit and background are evaluated.LDS Church Growth Over the Last 25 Years: Examining recent state-by-state growth data across the United States, the group discusses shifting demographics, migration patterns, and the powerful impact of sister missionaries across global congregations.Chapter Markers 00:00 - Episode Intro 00:35 - Welcome & BYU-Idaho Break Banter 01:22 - Listener Mailbag & Matt's Personal Announcement 03:08 - Shawn's AI Matt & Guest Host Openings 04:28 - Future Callings, Public Scrutiny, and Stepping Down 07:35 - Topic 1: NOAA Budget Cuts & Hurricane Forecast Reliability 09:12 - Levi on Private Sector Solutions vs. Market Redundancy 10:59 - NASA, SpaceX, and Government Efficiency in Basic Science 13:00 - D&C 134:1 & The Government's Moral Obligation to Public Good 15:06 - Toll Lanes, USPS Infrastructure, and Market Dependencies 20:39 - Social Democracy vs. Teddy Roosevelt Republicanism 23:11 - Downstream Costs of Cutting Science Agencies & DOGE Discussion 25:53 - Topic 2: Dismantling the Civilian Harm Mitigation Framework 27:06 - Correlation vs. Causation in Military Strikes 29:56 - Matt's Argument: Shortening Wars vs. Categorizing Casualties 32:21 - Levi's Counter: Conscription, Infrastructure, and Inherent Value of Civilians 36:03 - Deuteronomy 20:19, Alma 14, and Scriptural Contexts of Conflict 38:12 - Undeclared Wars and Constitutional Authority 39:53 - Topic 3: The Tragic Story of Cambridge Professor Jason Arday 42:16 - Dissertation Scrutiny, Claudine Gay, and Academic Witch Hunts 49:05 - The Psychological Toll and Double Standards of DEI Appointments 51:07 - Shawn on Overcoming Adversity vs. Institutional Programs 53:10 - Defining DEI: Accounting for Hurdles vs. Lowering Standards 55:28 - The Track Coach Analogy & Recruitment Pipelines 58:51 - Topic 4: 25 Years of LDS Church Growth Statistics 1:01:02 - Tolstoy Rumors & Why California Church Population Shrunk 1:02:39 - Should Members Move Away From Utah, Idaho, and Arizona? 1:03:37 - The Role and Impact of Sister Missionaries in Recent Growth 1:07:15 - Demographic Trends: Young Women Leaving & Mission Marriages 1:09:50 - Shawn's Parable Mix-Up: Wheat and Tares vs. Wheat and Chaff 1:11:08 - Wrap-Up and Sign-Off Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Is communal property ownership an eternal gospel principle, and are Latter-day Saints commanded to live the Law of Consecration right now? In this episode, Matt, Shawn, and guest Melanie explore the scriptural tensions between property rights and consecration, the unique social isolation of American poverty compared to the developing world, and new survey data breaking down religion by college major. They kick things off by answering a listener question from the mailbag: Are Latter-day Saints expected to live the Law of Consecration today, and what does that covenant actually require of us? From there, the trio digs into three thought-provoking topics: First this week. Brunella Tipismana, a Peruvian journalist, traveled through low-income areas in the United States (Arkansas, Kentucky and Oklahoma) and found that American poverty looks very different from poverty in developing countries. While poor Americans often have cars, appliances, and air conditioning, they face deep loneliness, severe drug addiction, and social isolation without the strong family support networks common in Latin America. Additionally, American culture often blames poor people for their struggles instead of recognizing bad luck or lack of opportunity. Americans often say that the poor in the US have it much better than poor people elsewhere, but maybe we are wrong. Is it possible that it is worse to be at the bottom of the economic ladder in the US than it is to be at the bottom in Peru? Next up.  Data analyst Ryan Burge examined survey data from over 68,000 American college students to study the link between academic majors, political ideology, and religious service attendance. Students in fields like nursing and finance attend services most often, while finance majors stand out as the most politically conservative group on campus. In contrast, students in the performing arts, English, and environmental studies attend services the least and lean far to the left politically. While frequent attendance generally correlates with right-leaning politics across most majors, notable exceptions exist: nursing students attend services at high rates while remaining politically centrist, and African-American studies majors combine regular attendance with strongly left-leaning political views. Do these data confirm the perception that conservative Americans are more religious than liberals? Finally. Angie Nixon, a democratic socialist and Florida state representative, won the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate. She defeated Alex Vindman, a more moderate candidate who raised far more money and was well known for testifying during Donald Trump’s first impeachment. Nixon supports policies such as universal health care, affordable child care, and a stronger economic message for working people. She will now face Republican Senator Ashley Moody in November. Some say that she will lose, but DSA members have won primaries in New York, PA, Colorado, and Michigan. Should Americans be worried about the successes of this movement in the Democratic Party? The Big Question: Last one on property. I think that these verses from the New Testament suggest that God is a proponent of communal ownership of property. In fact, I think that the number of verses that teach communal property ownership is so much higher than the number that teach something different suggests that maybe communal property ownership is an eternal principle. Am I wrong about that? Pro: Communal ownership and renunciation of possessions Acts 2:44–45 — “And all that believed were together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.”Acts 4:32, 34–35 — “neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common… as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them… and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.”.Luke 3:11 — “He that hath two coats, let him impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.”Luke 12:33 — “Sell that ye have, and give alms…”Luke 14:33 — “whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.”Matt. 19:21 — “If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor…” (Parallels Mark 10:21; Luke 18:22.)Luke 19:8 — Zacchaeus: “the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.”2 Cor. 8:13–15 — “But by an equality, that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want… that there may be equality: As it is written, He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had gathered little had no lack.” (Quoting the manna economy, Exod. 16:18.)1 Tim. 6:17–18 — The rich are to be “ready to distribute, willing to communicate.”Heb. 13:16 — “But to do good and to communicate forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased.”Jas. 5:1–4 — “Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl… the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth.”1 John 3:17 — “But whoso hath this world’s good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?”Con: passages protecting property against rulers and neighbors Exod. 20:15, 17 — “Thou shalt not steal”; “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house… nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.”1 Kgs. 21:3, 19 — Naboth refuses Ahab’s offer (“The LORD forbid it me, that I should give the inheritance of my fathers unto thee”), and the seizure draws divine judgment: “Hast thou killed, and also taken possession?” Ezek. 46:18 — “Moreover the prince shall not take of the people’s inheritance by oppression, to thrust them out of their possession; but he shall give his sons inheritance out of his own possession.”2 Sam. 24:24 — David refuses a free threshing floor: “I will surely buy it of thee at a price: neither will I offer… of that which doth cost me nothing.”Deut. 17:16–17 — The king “shall not… greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.” limits on royal accumulation.Deut. 19:14; Prov. 22:28 — “Thou shalt not remove thy neighbour’s landmark…”Isa. 5:8; Mic. 2:1–2 — Prophetic woes against those who “join house to house, that lay field to field” and who “covet fields, and take them by violence.” Acts 5:4 — Peter to Ananias: “Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?”  Chapter Markers 00:00 – Welcome, Choir Class, and Vacation Catch-Up 01:44 – Mailbag: Are We Living the Law of Consecration Today? 05:43 – Philosophers, Karl Marx, and Karl Popper 08:18 – Thought Provoker 1: Material Wealth vs. Isolation in American Poverty 14:46 – Family Support, Church Communities, and Culture 22:20 – Thought Provoker 2: Survey Data on College Majors, Politics, and Faith 27:35 – Generational Shifts in Conservatism and the National Debt 33:07 – Thought Provoker 3: Democratic Socialism, MAGA, and Political Homelessness 37:46 – Healthcare Debate: Government Competition vs. Free Markets 43:54 – Scriptural Debate: New Testament Proof Texts on Communal Property 50:10 – Doctrine & Covenants 134 vs. Acts: Individual Rights or All Things Common? 53:12 – Closing ReflectionsVisit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail In this episode of The Latter Day Lens, Matt, Shawn, and special guest Porter dive into listener mailbag questions and examine today's pressing societal and religious questions through a Latter-day Saint perspective.  Topics Covered in This Episode: Listener Mailbag: A lighthearted debate on favorite taxes, tithing, and common misconceptions surrounding plural marriage (polygamy) and D&C 132. The 3 P's of Youth Retention: Analyzing Jana Reese and Benjamin Knoll's research regarding why young women leave the Church (politics, purity culture, powerlessness) vs. individual faith journeys. Radical Immigration Reform: Porter shares insight from working at an immigration law firm to analyze current enforcement, Senator John Curtis's proposed state-level worker visa bill, and a free-market approach to open borders vs. federalism. Public Trust vs. Accountability: Evaluating public figures in high-trust positions—including Ohio Representative Max Miller and broadcaster Tony Romo—and discussing when accountability, leave, or termination is warranted. Government Authority & Property: Debating scriptural precedents (from Old Testament kings to D&C 134) regarding taxation, eminent domain, and government's legitimate role in resource allocation. Chapter Markers  00:00 - Introduction & Welcoming Guest Porter 01:04 - Post-Grad Plans: Work, Law School & Roosevelt 01:33 - Mailbag: What Is Shawn’s Favorite Tax? 03:36 - Tithing vs. Taxes: Matt’s Alternative Proposal 04:39 - Mailbag: Plural Marriage, D&C 132 & President Hinckley 07:24 - Accountability, Law of Consecration & Cultural Misconceptions 09:40 - Jana Reese Study: Why Young Women Leave the Church 10:43 - Data Skepticism, Sample Bias & Sociological Approaches 13:33 - The Individual Nature of Faith Journeys & Exit Reasons 15:51 - Scriptural Foundations vs. Modern Distractions 17:24 - Immigration Policy: Deportations & Sen. John Curtis’s State Visa Bill 18:21 - Porter’s Legal Perspective: Laissez-Faire Borders & State Dept. Barriers 23:07 - Matt’s Perspective: Abolishing Citizenship & Border Realities 25:02 - Shawn’s Pragmatic View: Infrastructure, Federalism & Border Chaos 33:42 - Public Trust & Morality: Rep. Max Miller Allegations & Ethics Investigation 34:18 - Driving Inebriated: Tony Romo Leave & Stephen A. Smith Comments 43:15 - The Big Question: Scriptural Authority on Property Rights & Government Taxes 48:32 - D&C 134, Individual Choice & Final Takeaways Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail In this deep-dive episode of The Latter-Day Lens, hosts Matt and Shawn tackle listener mail and pressing socio-political questions through a unique Latter-day Saint perspective. 1. Listener Mailbag: Mormon Heaven & Eternal Polygamy A listener and mental health therapist shares why young LDS women are feeling disheartened by perceptions of a male-centric heaven. Matt and Sean discuss Heavenly Mother, the theological vs. cultural views on celestial marriage, and whether the shadow of plural marriage continues to impact young members today. 2. Thought Provoker 1: AI, Job Automation & Tax Policy As artificial intelligence threatens to displace human jobs, current tax codes favor corporate assets and technology over human workers. Should governments equalize or raise taxes on equipment and AI while lowering taxes on human labor? 3. Thought Provoker 2: Utah Book Bans & Local Federalism Bestselling author Stephen King criticized Utah after his book Different Seasons was removed from public school shelves under a state law triggered by local district flags. Is automatic statewide book removal a tyranny of the minority, or a necessary safeguard? Matt and Sean debate expert authority, parent involvement, and local control. 4. Thought Provoker 3: Presidential War Powers & Standing Armies Following the death of First Lt. Tyler James Feehan, the hosts analyze the constitutional intent behind war declarations. Is it morally wrong for a president to deploy troops into harm's way without explicit congressional authorization? 5. Scriptural Property Rights (Part 3) Continuing their multi-part series, Matt and Shawn examine biblical and Book of Mormon precedents—from Joseph in Egypt to King Solomon and David—regarding government taxation, land reallocation, and divine command theory. Key Takeaways LDS Cultural Views vs. Gospel Doctrine: How cultural assumptions about eternal polygamy differ from canonized scripture and equal exaltation.Economic Incentives for Automation: How tax structures reward replacing human labor with technology and whether "sin taxes" on consumption offer a viable alternative.School Board Dynamics & Expertise: Why group debates without domain expertise can lead to flawed policy decisions in public education.Constitutional Military Separation: The founding principles behind avoiding standing armies and requiring congressional authorization for war.Chapter Markers 00:00 – Welcome & Summer Schedule Updates 01:12 – Communism Theory vs. Historical Reality 03:32 – Is Government Inherently Moral or Immoral? 05:40 – Mailbag: Why Young Women Are Leaving the LDS Church 07:00 – Listener Email: Heavenly Mother & Perceptions of Mormon Heaven 08:20 – Sean’s Take: Equality of Men & Women in LDS Doctrine 11:25 – Culture vs. Doctrine Around Celestial Marriage 14:15 – Listener Mail: The Shadow of Eternal Polygamy 17:40 – Old Testament Examples: Marriage of Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob 19:00 – Thought Provoker 1: AI, Automation, & Job Loss 22:00 – Taxing Wages vs. Taxing Business Assets & Equipment 25:00 – Sin Taxes, Consumption, and Incentivizing Human Labor 30:05 – Thought Provoker 2: Stephen King Criticism of Utah Book Laws 31:15 – Federalism, Local School Boards, and Banning Books 33:00 – Expertise in Libraries vs. Parent Preferences 36:50 – The Physics Class Experiment: Debates vs. Domain Expertise 41:25 – Thought Provoker 3: Remembering First Lt. Tyler James Fein 43:40 – Constitutional Founding Principles & Standing Armies 48:00 – Military Contracts, Conscription, and Geneva Conventions 50:35 – War Powers Resolution, Ceasefires, & Presidential Authority 53:50 – Preemptive Strikes vs. Defending against Direct Attacks 56:06 – Property Rights Part 3: Scriptural Precedents on Taxes & Land 57:50 – Historical Conquest, Original Land Ownership, & Native Claims 01:00:40 – Divine Command Theory vs. Human-Initiated Land Reallocation 01:03:38 – D&C Dissonance & Closing Remarks Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Join Matt, Shawn, and guest Levi as they tackle complex cultural and geopolitical issues through a Latter-day Saint lens! In this episode, the team discusses a listener mailbag letter on unrighteous dominion and eternal polygamy, dives into the nuclear diplomacy double standards between South Korea and Saudi Arabia, debates employee stock ownership vs. free market principles, and explores the gospel perspective on property rights and taking care of those in need. 🔑 Key Topics Covered: Mailbag: Navigating church leadership boundaries, unrighteous dominion, and addressing cultural anxieties around eternal marriage and polygamy.Geopolitics & Energy: Who gets to develop nuclear energy? Comparing U.S. policies on South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Iran using Doctrine and Covenants 98.Accountability & Cancel Culture: Is firing an employee for sending a private racist message the right response, or is there a path to redemption and education?Economic Debates: Mark Cuban claims granting every employee company stock will solve wealth inequality. Is broad stock ownership a free-market solution or a form of communism?The Big Question (Property Rights): What do Old and New Testament scriptures (Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Third Nephi) teach about property ownership, God’s ownership, and our duty to the poor? 00:00 - Introduction & Pioneer Day Banter 02:11 - Mailbag: Unrighteous Dominion & Appeals to the Presiding Bishopric 04:45 - Do Young Women Leave Over Eternal Marriage Anxieties? 07:11 - Thought Provoker 1: Nuclear Diplomacy (South Korea vs. Saudi Arabia) 10:00 - Applying D&C 98 to Foreign Policy & Proclaiming Peace 14:55 - Distinguishing Nuclear Fuel Energy from Weapons Grade Enrichment 25:44 - Thought Provoker 2: Racist Instagram DMs & Workplace Firing 28:30 - Third Nephi 18: Restorative Discipline vs. Cancel Culture 32:28 - Thought Provoker 3: Mark Cuban on Broad Employee Stock Ownership 35:00 - Defining Worker Ownership: Proudhon, Marx, and Free Markets 41:00 - Are Modern American Workers Feeling Exploited? 51:17 - The Big Question: Does God Limit Property Rights? 53:15 - Deuteronomy 23 & Leviticus 19: Gleaning, Sickles, and the Poor 58:40 - Land Value Taxes (Henry George) vs. Local Sales Taxes 1:01:10 - Final Thoughts & Episode Wrap-Up Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens

Send us Fan Mail Episode Summary: Melanie returns to the show to add a missing perspective as the team tackles a wide range of timely and complex topics! The crew begins by diving into LDS youth retention rates, examining why young women leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at higher rates than young men between ages 18 and 25. From there, Matt, Shawn, and Melanie examine Russian oligarch Andrei Melnichenko’s warnings regarding Putin and the Ukraine conflict, debating what role the United States should play in foreign interventions. They also dissect a troubling Gallup poll showing historic lows in public trust toward major American institutions, before discussing political truth-telling in light of Senator Mike Lee’s recent controversial statements. Finally, the hosts kick off Part 1 of a deep dive into the scriptural principles of property ownership, debating the difference between stewardship and true ownership, the legacy of the Shakers, and whether God ultimately owns everything—including our physical bodies. In this episode, we discuss: Why retention rates for young LDS women (40%) lag behind young men (60%) in the 18–25 age group.The role of empathy, gender representation, and leadership in navigating difficult Church topics.Russian oligarch Andrei Melnichenko’s four future scenarios for Russia and the U.S. responsibility in foreign conflict.Declining trust in core democratic institutions (schools, presidency, news) and President Dallin H. Oaks’ charge on defending the U.S. Constitution.Holding politicians accountable for conspiracy theories and misinformation.The Big Question: Gospel principles on property rights, stewardship vs. ownership, and Karl Marx vs. scriptural consecration.Resource Links & References: Website: Latter Day LensPresident Dallin H. Oaks on the U.S. Constitution (Defending the Constitution, April 2021 General Conference).⏱️ Chapter Markers Timestamp | Chapter Title 00:00 | Welcome Back Melanie & Youth Retention Rates in the LDS Church 00:01:24 | Empathy, Leadership, and Women's Perspectives in the Church 00:03:30 | Listener Feedback: Communist Rants & The Invisible Hand 00:07:28 | The Thought Provoker: Russian Oligarchs & The Ukraine War 00:10:03 | Should America Meddle in Russian Internal Politics? 00:15:33 | Historic Lows in Public Trust: Gallup Poll Analysis 00:17:41 | Latter-day Saint Responsibility to Defend the Constitution 00:26:00 | Political Truth & Media Disinformation: Senator Mike Lee’s Claims 00:31:55 | Character vs. Policy: Voting for Wise and Honest Leaders 00:35:10 | The Big Question: What Do Scriptures Say About Property Ownership? 00:41:35 | Communal Living, The Shaker Movement, and Stewardship 00:44:30 | The Body, Agency, and Eternal Property Rights Keywords & Search Tags Latter-day Saints, LDS Podcast, Latter Day Lens, LDS Youth Retention, Women in the LDS Church, LDS Church Membership Trends, President Dallin H Oaks, US Constitution LDS, Public Trust in Institutions, Foreign Policy Ukraine Russia, Gospel Perspectives on Property, Law of Consecration vs Socialism, Stewardship vs Ownership, LDS Political Discourse, Mormon Theology, Mike Lee Patriot Front, Christianity and Property Rights Visit our website to join the conversation: Latter-day Lens