Advertise on podcast: Basic Law

Three years after October 7, Israel faces a dangerous new threat and this time, the battlefield is the international legal system. In this episode of "Basic Law", Aylana Meisel-Diament exposes what she argues could become a devastating legal precedent at the International Court of Justice, potentially lowering the threshold for proving genocide and putting Israel and other Western democracies at risk. She examines whether Israel’s own Supreme Court has weakened the country’s ability to defend itself, and why decades of legal restraint have failed to shield Israeli leaders from international prosecution. Plus, a dramatic election controversy involving an Arab politician’s statements about October 7 raises troubling questions about double standards in Israeli democracy.

In this wide-ranging election interview, opposition lawmaker MK Moshe Tur-Paz attempts to reconcile some of Israel’s most consequential challenges: integrating the rapidly growing Haredi population through major changes to education, employment and national service. The conversation then turns to judicial reform, LGBTQ issues in religious schools and his party’s controversial proposal for a “thin constitution.” It’s a revealing look at the ideas and political alliances that could shape Israel after the election.

Israel desperately needs more soldiers, but bringing thousands of Haredim into the IDF could transform far more than the size of the army. Rabbi Yehoshua Pfeffer, a Haredi rabbi who himself enlisted after October 7, explains why Israel’s old approach to Haredi military service is breaking down and why a new Haredi political movement is challenging decades of conventional thinking. From clashes over women serving alongside religious soldiers to draft exemptions, Supreme Court intervention and what he calls the “politics of poverty,” you’ll learn how this emerging movement wants to redefine the relationship between Haredim and the Jewish state, and why its vision of partnership could reshape both Israeli politics and the IDF.

What if the real driver of violence in Judea and Samaria isn't ideology, but a decades-old legal vacuum almost nobody is talking about? Aylana Meisel-Diament sits down with Amiad Cohen to unpack his provocative argument that unclear land ownership, inconsistent enforcement and overlapping Israeli, Palestinian, Jordanian, British and Ottoman legal systems have created a system where disputes can become physical battles for control. From settler violence and Palestinian construction to E1, European pressure and the future of Area C, Cohen explains why he believes Israel needs to move from military management toward civilian policing and clearly defined property rights. You'll learn why he sees this as "practicing sovereignty" without formally declaring it, how October 7 changed Israel's strategic debate and why a seemingly technical fight over policing and land registration could ultimately determine the future of Judea and Samaria. The Israel Law & Liberty Forum is proud to partner with JNS to offer a platform for conservative and classical liberal legal thought from within Israel. Any opinions stated are those of the speaker and not meant to represent the positions of the Forum or JNS. The Forum fosters thoughtful conversation and debate on key issues in Israeli law and democracy and takes no official positions regarding specific policy issues.

What happens when the government tries to fight antisemitism on campus and the courts stand in its way? In this episode of Basic Law, Aylana Meisel-Diament is joined by Kenneth L. Marcus, founder and chairman of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights, to examine the legal battle over antisemitism in American education. The discussion begins with a federal judge’s decision to dismiss the Justice Department’s civil-rights case against Harvard and what that ruling could mean for future Title VI enforcement. Marcus explains why he believes the decision applied the wrong standard and discusses its potential implications for cases involving other universities, including UCLA. The conversation also explores allegations surrounding the Justice Department’s handling of university investigations, the role of federal funding in enforcing civil-rights protections, and the spread of antisemitism beyond higher education into K-12 schools and other institutions. The Israel Law & Liberty Forum is proud to partner with JNS to offer a platform for conservative and classical liberal legal thought from within Israel. Any opinions stated are those of the speaker and not meant to represent the positions of the Forum or JNS. The Forum fosters thoughtful conversation and debate on key issues in Israeli law and democracy and takes no official positions regarding specific policy issues.

What happens when the right to family life collides with a state's duty to protect its citizens? In this episode of Basic Law, Aylana Meisel-Diament examines the debate over Israel's Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law and the controversial Shir Hagag amendment, which restricts residency or entry for terrorists and certain members of their families. The dispute raises a fundamental question in Israeli law and society: How should Israel balance individual rights against collective security? Supporters of tougher restrictions point to terrorism, security data, deterrence, and Israel's sovereign right to control its borders. Critics argue that penalizing relatives for another person's actions can violate fundamental rights to family life and equality - and risks imposing consequences on people who may have had nothing to do with the offense. The Israeli Supreme Court has wrestled with this broader tension for decades, repeatedly confronting where constitutional rights end and security necessity begins. This episode presents both sides of the debate: Is restricting family reunification and the status of terrorists' relatives a necessary security measure in the fight against terrorism? Or does collective punishment cross a line that a democracy committed to individual rights should not cross?

What if one agreement signed 30 years ago is still driving today's biggest security crisis? Former IDF prosecutor Lt. Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch argues that the Oslo Accords didn't just fail, they created the conditions for today's security challenges, from the growth of the Palestinian Authority's security forces to the global campaign surrounding "settler violence." You'll learn why he believes the Oslo framework has become a strategic liability and why dismantling the Palestinian Authority has become, in his view, essential for both Israeli and Palestinian security.

In this exclusive interview, former Knesset Speaker and longtime Likud leader Yuli Edelstein explains why he left the party, why he believes Israel's political system is no longer functioning as it should and what must change before the country faces its next major crisis. From the Haredi draft debate and judicial reform to Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria, the future of the Knesset and the balance of power between the government and the courts, Edelstein offers an insider's perspective on the biggest constitutional and political battles shaping Israel today. Whether you agree with him or not, you'll come away with a deeper understanding of how Israel's government really works and why one of its most experienced lawmakers believes the status quo cannot continue. This is the second installment in a new Basic Law interview series exploring the full spectrum of Israeli political thought ahead of Israel's next national elections. Across the series, you'll hear directly from leaders spanning the political landscape as they explain their vision for Israel's future.

Israel's political future may be changing faster than anyone realizes. In this exclusive conversation, former Knesset member Dr. Einat Wilf explains why she believes Israel is fighting a battle far bigger than rockets and missiles: a global narrative war that could determine the country's future. From constitutional reform and the role of the Supreme Court to military service, education, Palestinian identity and the creation of her new Oz Party, Wilf lays out a vision that challenges both the Israeli right and left. Whether you agree with her or not, you'll come away with a deeper understanding of the ideological debates shaping Israel's next chapter and why the biggest battles may no longer be fought on the battlefield. This is the first installment in a new Basic Law interview series exploring the full spectrum of Israeli political thought ahead of Israel's next national elections. Across the series, you'll hear directly from leaders spanning the political landscape as they explain their vision for Israel's future.

Is the International Criminal Court finally facing its biggest reckoning yet? Host Aylana Meisel examines Secretary of State Marco Rubio's campaign to dismantle the ICC and asks a deeper question: has the court become a political institution rather than a legal one? You'll learn why the ICC's record has drawn criticism around the world, how its cases against Israel fit into a much broader debate over sovereignty and international law and why the distinction between law and justice may be the most important issue of all.

David Zini's remarks about where the Shin Bet's loyalty belongs have ignited a fierce national debate, but this episode reveals that the controversy is about far more than one security chief. In this episode of Basic Law, Aylana Meisel-Diament and constitutional scholar Yonatan Green examine why Zini's comments have become a flashpoint in Israel's struggle over the balance of power between elected officials, the courts and the civil service. They also explore the surprising role America's constitutional tradition has played in shaping Israel, from the influence of the U.S. Declaration of Independence on Israel's founding to the importation of modern judicial theories that continue to fuel today's legal and political battles. If you want to understand both the immediate controversy surrounding David Zini and the deeper constitutional ideas driving Israel's ongoing governance debate, this conversation provides the history, context and competing visions shaping the country's future.

What if the solution to Israel's judicial crisis isn't more political power, but less judicial power? In this thought-provoking episode of Basic Law, Aylana Meisel unpacks the standoff between Israel's Supreme Court and Justice Minister Yariv Levin over judicial appointments, revealing how a deeper constitutional issue may hold the key to breaking the deadlock. Viewers will learn how Israel's unique judicial selection system works, why court vacancies are creating a growing legal crisis and how decades-old changes to legal standing transformed the Supreme Court into one of the most powerful courts in the democratic world. Most importantly, the episode explores a surprising compromise that could ease political tensions, reduce judicial activism and reshape the future of Israeli democracy...if either side is willing to make the first move.

Federal Judge Roy Altman joins Basic Law to break down the legal case behind the headlines, exposing how international institutions, media narratives and political activism collide in the battle over Israel's legitimacy. Viewers will learn how legal standards are applied (and sometimes misapplied), why international courts have become a key front in the war over public opinion and what the surge in global antisemitism reveals about the broader struggle for truth in the modern information age. Whether you agree or disagree, this conversation challenges assumptions and offers a framework for evaluating some of the most controversial claims of our time.

Can legal accountability succeed where public diplomacy has failed? In this episode of Basic Law, attorney Mark Goldfeder explains how a series of innovative legal challenges are taking aim at what he describes as a growing ecosystem of anti-Israel discrimination, defamation and institutional bias. Viewers will learn how shareholder activism is being used to scrutinize the New York Times over controversial reporting, why a Brooklyn food co-op's boycott of Israeli products may violate civil rights law and how international bodies like the United Nations can help create narratives that ripple through society. More than a discussion of individual lawsuits, this episode explores a broader strategy: using legal tools to push back against campaigns that seek to isolate, delegitimize or discriminate against Israel and its supporters.

Alan Dershowitz detonates a warning flare over the future of free speech and Jewish safety, arguing that today’s biggest threat is not just bad reporting, but the way false narratives spread and put Jews at risk. Viewers will learn why he believes defamation law is failing, how speech protections may need to adapt to the internet age, why “anti-Zionism” is often treated differently from other forms of hate and what the Jewish world must do now to fight back.