Advertise on podcast: Liberty Roundtable Podcast

How do you hold leaders accountable while offering a path back to constitutional government? Sam Bushman and Curt Crosby discuss President Trump, impeachment, and the balance between demanding change and allowing room for correction. This Liberty Round Table episode also explores personal integrity, forgiveness, AI cybersecurity risks, and gold and silver in the Honest Money Report. The hosts discuss a sugar-related health study, debate who should pay for AI data center infrastructure, and weigh constitutional questions surrounding military action. The conversation closes with their perspectives on Social Security, privately funded children’s investment accounts, and encouraging wealthy Americans to invest in the next generation. Linked Timestamps 00:00 Liberty Round Table introduction 00:48 Marriage, personal integrity, and responsibility 03:23 Accountability, repentance, and second chances 05:34 AI agents, wind farms, and cybersecurity risks 06:54 Honest Money Report: Gold, silver, and dollar purchasing power 08:51 Sugar study discussion and calls to research alternatives 10:58 Promotional break: Book and CSPOA membership 12:37 Jim Jordan, Republican priorities, and impeachment concerns 14:27 Returning to constitutional government while holding Trump accountable 17:15 Who should pay for AI data center grid upgrades? 20:15 Massie, Hegseth, and constitutional limits on military action 21:43 Social Security, children’s investment accounts, and private philanthropy 24:38 Sponsor information and closing remarks Call to Action How should Americans hold leaders accountable while moving the country back toward constitutional government? Share your thoughts in the comments and tell us which reform should come first. Subscribe to Liberty Round Table and share this conversation with someone who values limited government and personal responsibility.

Did voters embrace Democrats, or were they punishing Republicans for failing to deliver? Sam Bushman and Curt Crosby debate that question and discuss what it would take to rebuild public trust before 2028. This Liberty Round Table episode also examines media coverage of President Trump, a disputed Federal Reserve conversation, RFK Jr.’s health agenda, and who should pay for large data centers. The hosts offer their perspectives on Lake Powell, weather headlines, and the role of faith before closing with a discussion of election transparency and public records. At the center of the conversation: political promises mean little without measurable results and accountability. Linked Timestamps 00:00 Liberty Round Table introduction 02:02 Precious metals and the honest money report 03:08 RFK Jr.’s food agenda and political roadblocks 04:13 Who should pay for large data centers? 04:32 Trump, the Fed, and a disputed rate conversation 06:58 Trump’s C-SPAN appearance and criticism of media coverage 09:24 Lake Powell, water levels, and faith 12:44 Pacific temperature headlines and the hosts’ response 15:30 Snow forecasts and the importance of mountain snowpack 17:51 RFK Jr., Stephen Miller, and the MAHA discussion 19:16 Blue wave or voter frustration with Republicans? 23:36 Election transparency and requesting public records Call to Action Do election results reflect support for the winning party or frustration with broken promises? Share your take in the comments and tell us what measurable results you want from Congress before 2028. Subscribe to Liberty Round Table and share this episode with someone who values accountability and open discussion.

Could a citizens' panel help Congress keep its constitutional oath? Sam Bushman and Sheriff Richard Mack welcome Sunny Reid Jr. to explore his proposal for randomly selected citizens to review bills before lawmakers vote. The conversation examines jury-style selection, constitutional education, shorter single-subject bills, and a proposed two-thirds voting requirement for legislation flagged by the panel. They also debate the practical hurdles, including congressional rule changes, constitutional amendments, and partisan resistance. The episode opens with reflections on Jimmy Stewart, Veterans Day, and family military service before turning to citizen oversight and accountability. Linked Timestamps 00:00 Introduction to Liberty Round Table 00:21 What would make Congress’s constitutional oath matter? 01:04 Jimmy Stewart, military service, and the movie Jimmy 03:11 Sheriff Mack honors his family’s World War II service 07:49 Meet Sunny Reid Jr. and hear his background 11:30 How a jury-style citizens review panel could work 13:36 The proposal for single-subject bills under 50 pages 15:39 Congressional rule changes or a constitutional amendment? 17:15 Selecting panel members by lottery and limiting their terms 17:55 Constitutional education and balanced expert testimony 21:32 Drafting a proposal and finding congressional sponsors 22:59 Why citizens must understand the Constitution Call to Action Should citizens review bills before Congress votes? Tell us whether you think this proposal could work and what safeguards you would want. Subscribe to Liberty Round Table and watch the next segment as Sam Bushman, Sheriff Richard Mack, and Sunny Reid Jr. discuss how to put the idea into practice.

What if citizens reviewed congressional bills before lawmakers voted? Sam Bushman, Sheriff Richard Mack, and Sunny Reid Jr. from Florida explore a proposed citizens' panel that would examine legislation for constitutional authority and publish its findings. The discussion covers starting with one bill, building a pilot panel, involving constitutional experts, and creating a consistent review process. It’s a practical conversation about constitutional accountability, transparency, and turning an idea into citizen-led action. Linked Timestamps 00:00 Introduction to Liberty Round Table 00:52 The idea: A citizens review of Congress 02:05 Sunny Reid Jr. outlines his committee charter 04:06 Sheriff Mack on the Constitution and oaths of office 06:47 Start with one bill and one citizens panel 11:45 Prove the concept before seeking congressional approval 13:04 Naming the movement and avoiding partisan branding 15:36 Define the process, scope, budget, and resources 20:15 Standardize bill reviews and ask who benefits 24:30 CSPOA membership and closing invitation Call to Action Would you support a citizens panel reviewing bills before Congress votes? Share your thoughts in the comments, subscribe to Liberty RoundTable, and visit CSPOA.org to learn about membership and weekly webinars.

Should a president take the country to war without congressional approval? And how should Congress respond when constitutional boundaries are crossed? On this episode of Liberty Roundtable, Sam Bushman and Lance Migliaccio of The Big Mig Show debate presidential war powers, congressional oversight, and the impeachment effort discussed in the broadcast involving Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Rep. Thomas Massie. Lance challenges Congress’s effectiveness and defends Hegseth’s leadership, while Sam argues that past presidential actions do not excuse departures from the Constitution. They consider whether a congressional warning resolution could offer a better path than impeachment for restoring limits on executive power. The episode also covers Dana White’s White House appearance, disagreements over Trump’s advisers and immigration policy, and calls for lawmakers to use the lame-duck session productively. They close by discussing tariffs, economic uncertainty, and the role of independent media in holding leaders accountable. A spirited debate about constitutional limits, political loyalty, and whether good intentions can justify expanding presidential power. Episode Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and guest welcome 01:04 Dana White’s White House appearance 02:56 Debate over Susie Wiles and White House staffing 07:14 Immigration policy and campaign promises 09:37 Introducing the Hegseth impeachment debate 10:15 Audio presented as Massie’s impeachment resolution 11:18 Audio presented as Hegseth’s response 12:25 Lance’s defense of Hegseth and criticism of Congress 15:39 Sam’s case for constitutional war powers 18:24 A challenge to Congress: act during the lame-duck session 20:45 A warning resolution instead of impeachment? 22:49 Tariffs, congressional backing, and market uncertainty 23:52 Independent media and presidential accountability Call to Action Where should the line be drawn between presidential leadership and Congress’s authority over war? Share your thoughts, follow Liberty Roundtable on your favorite podcast app, and send this episode to someone who values a serious debate about the Constitution. Leave a rating or review to help more listeners find the show.

Who holds powerful people accountable when money, politics, and influence collide? On this episode of Liberty Roundtable, Sam Bushman welcomes Lance Migliaccio of The Big Mig Show for a discussion about espionage risks, corporate leadership, and the standards expected of people in positions of trust. They question whether wealthy executives and political insiders face the same scrutiny and consequences as ordinary Americans. The conversation shifts to falling gasoline prices, persistent grocery costs, and their criticism of the Federal Reserve and government economic policy. Sam and Lance also challenge Congress to prioritize meaningful action over leadership contests and political appearances during the lame-duck session. Later, they discuss concerns about weight-loss medications and obstacles to healthcare reform. Sam closes with commentary on the National Popular Vote Compact, conservative media, and why he believes faith, constitutional limits, and principles should come before party loyalty. A pointed conversation about public trust, equal treatment under the law, and the gap between political promises and results. Episode Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and episode preview 00:42 Lance Migliaccio joins: espionage allegations and leadership 04:59 Questioning assurances about sensitive information 07:36 Corporate accountability and public trust 09:18 Falling gas prices and questions about pricing 10:34 Grocery costs, economic policy, and the Federal Reserve 14:19 Congressional leadership versus lame-duck action 17:06 Equal application of the law 17:29 Faith, family, and constitutional government 18:52 Discussion of GLP-1 medications and safety concerns 20:20 Lance’s closing thoughts on healthcare reform 21:50 The National Popular Vote Compact and Electoral College 22:52 Conservative media and putting principles above party Call to Action What would real accountability look like in Washington and corporate America? Share your perspective, follow Liberty Roundtable on your favorite podcast app, and send this episode to someone who believes the same rules should apply to everyone. Leave a rating or review to help more listeners discover the show.

Can immigration reform protect the public while showing compassion to families seeking a better life? On this episode of Liberty Roundtable, Sam Bushman and Lowell Nelson explore how justice, mercy, and personal responsibility can shape a more humane immigration system. Inspired by Lowell’s review of the musical Brotherhood, they discuss the families behind the political debate and the importance of judging people by their actions rather than their backgrounds. Sam outlines his proposed approach to immigration reform, pairing firm action against violent offenders with a structured path forward for otherwise law-abiding immigrants. They consider fines, employer involvement, and opportunities to resolve immigration status without blanket amnesty. The episode opens with Lowell’s account of visiting filmmaker Ken Cromar in prison, followed by a discussion of prison reform and alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders. A faith-centered conversation about public safety, human dignity, and finding solutions beyond political extremes. Episode Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and episode preview 00:36 Lowell’s prison visit with Ken Cromar 04:19 Prison reform and alternatives for nonviolent offenders 04:58 Financial incentives in the prison system 06:39 Brotherhood: a musical about immigration and family 09:01 Sam’s justice and mercy immigration proposal 12:46 Seeking a better life: empathy and accountability 14:47 Fabián’s story and faith in American justice 17:27 Les Misérables, desperation, and moral dilemmas 19:26 Friendship across cultures and rejecting stereotypes 21:18 Compassion and helping people pursue legal status 21:55 Building trust instead of driving people underground 23:06 Finding common ground on public safety and reform Call to Action What would an immigration policy rooted in both justice and mercy look like to you? Share your perspective, follow Liberty Roundtable on your favorite podcast app, and send this episode to someone willing to have a thoughtful conversation beyond the headlines. Leave a rating or review to help more listeners discover the show.

Who benefits from Utah’s development deals, and who gets stuck with the bill? On this episode of Liberty Roundtable, Sam Bushman and Lowell Nelson examine concerns about public infrastructure districts, or PIDs, and the debt and additional property taxes they can place on homeowners. Drawing on a presentation by Utah State Auditor Tina Cannon, Lowell discusses unelected district boards, developer financing, transparency requirements, and why buyers should investigate a property’s tax obligations before closing. They also question the long-term financing of the proposed Stratus data center project in Box Elder County and discuss ways citizens can push for greater accountability. Then, the conversation broadens to government surveillance, privacy, and constitutional limits. Drawing on commentary from Judge Andrew Napolitano and Murray Sabrin’s The Abolition Manifesto, Sam and Lowell argue that government programs should face two basic questions: Is it constitutional, and was the authority delegated? A discussion about taxpayer protection, limited government, and taking responsibility for preserving liberty. Episode Timestamps 00:00 Introduction 00:27 Utah’s development districts and taxpayer concerns 01:54 What are public infrastructure districts? 05:50 Homebuyers and additional property taxes 07:59 Stratus data center financing concerns 09:07 Transparency requirements and growing district debt 09:55 Can citizens stop unfinanced districts? 12:56 Real estate agents push back on PID properties 13:53 Does government work for us? 15:52 Privacy, surveillance, and self-censorship 16:34 Murray Sabrin’s The Abolition Manifesto 19:39 Constitutional authority and holding officials accountable 22:30 Challenging government expansion 23:45 Economic, political, and personal independence Call to Action Do you know what’s on your property tax bill? Review your tax statement, learn whether your home sits within a public infrastructure district, and ask your local representatives about district debt and oversight. Follow Liberty Roundtable, share this episode with a homeowner or prospective buyer, and leave a rating or review to help others find the show.

Are political parties protecting liberty, or putting themselves between the people and their government? And when we pledge allegiance, do we understand what we’re promising? On this episode of Liberty Roundtable, Sam Bushman welcomes Dr. Scott Bradley and Liberty United founder Jacob Oaks for a discussion about political factions, concentrated power, and the importance of putting principles above party loyalty. Drawing on George Washington’s Farewell Address and writings by Noah Webster, they debate party privilege, access for independent and third-party candidates, and whether decentralizing political power can help restore representative government. Sam also lays out his case for neighborhood-level caucuses and candidate vetting without partisan gatekeeping. The conversation then turns to the Pledge of Allegiance. The guests discuss its history, the difference between understanding and simply reciting its words, and their differing views on allegiance to God, country, and a constitutional republic. A conversation about faith, informed citizenship, and the danger of allowing political loyalty to replace personal conviction. Episode Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and episode preview 01:02 Introducing Jacob Oaks and Liberty United 01:44 Political factions, party privilege, and primary elections 05:14 Washington’s warning about the spirit of party 07:42 Jacob’s case for decentralization and equal political access 09:30 Dr. Bradley’s experience with parties and political independence 11:37 Noah Webster on equal rights and political favoritism 13:31 A precinct-level alternative to partisan gatekeeping 14:42 The Pledge of Allegiance: symbols, principles, and patriotism 16:33 Dr. Bradley discusses the Pledge’s origins and evolution 19:18 The Children’s Story: reciting words versus understanding them 20:50 Respecting different views on the Pledge 21:53 Jacob explains why he reserves his allegiance for God 23:53 Closing thoughts and a preview of the continuing discussion Call to Action Do your principles shape your politics, or does your party shape your principles? Share your thoughts, follow Liberty Roundtable on your favorite podcast app, and send this episode to someone who enjoys a thoughtful conversation about faith, freedom, and constitutional government. Leave a rating or review to help more listeners find the show.

Can you love your country without pledging allegiance to its government? And when political loyalty clashes with faith and constitutional principles, which comes first? On this episode of Liberty Roundtable, Sam Bushman joins Dr. Scott Bradley and Jacob Oaks for a spirited discussion about the Pledge of Allegiance, sacred covenants, and the proper relationship between God, family, and country. They explore differing views on allegiance, the meaning of constitutional oaths, and the principles they believe should guide public service. The conversation then turns to their assessment of the midterm elections, criticism of both major parties, Republican prospects for 2028, and potential risks during the lame-duck session. They close by considering whether a principles-first political movement can offer a meaningful alternative. At the heart of the discussion is one question: Are we standing for enduring principles, or simply standing with our political team? Episode Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and guest welcome 00:49 The Pledge of Allegiance: patriotism versus government loyalty 02:17 God, family, and country: putting allegiance in order 04:54 Blackstone, divine law, and the foundations of liberty 06:42 Defining allegiance, oaths, and sacred covenants 08:33 Midterm reactions and criticism of the two-party system 12:15 Can Republicans recover for 2028? 13:50 Impeachment speculation and a changing political landscape 17:49 Lame-duck concerns and international flashpoints 19:50 Restoring honor, faith, and constitutional principles 22:47 Can candidates put principles above party loyalty? 23:14 The Independent American Party and principles of good government Call to Action Where do you draw the line between patriotism and political loyalty? Share your perspective, follow Liberty Roundtable on your favorite podcast app, and send this episode to someone who values thoughtful debate about faith, liberty, and the Constitution. If this conversation challenged you to think more deeply, leave a rating or review to help others discover the show.

Sam Bushman and Curt Crosby break down the post-election fallout as Republicans lost at least 24 House seats and 7 Senate seats, with races in Alaska, Mississippi, and Kansas still uncalled. Sam calls Alaska the new Florida hanging-chad scenario with the Dan Sullivan scandal, while Mitt Romney and Thomas Massie both publicly blame Republican losses on failed policy, broken promises, the Iran war, deficits, and corruption. JD Vance agrees the war cost the GOP, but Trump says he'd do it again. Sam argues the war was unconstitutional without Congressional approval and that following the process would have saved the election, while Curt counters that if millions of lives were at stake, Trump did what he had to do. They also discuss Mike Johnson stepping down from House leadership, Curt's concerns about Massie's personal life and grandstanding, George Washington's warning about political parties destroying the nation, and Sam's proposal to abolish partisan precincts. Timestamps: 0:17 - Post-election: Republicans lost 24 House seats, 7 Senate seats, races still uncalled3:11 - Alaska is the new Florida: Dan Sullivan scandal and easy manipulation in small states5:33 - Romney and Massie blame GOP losses on failed policy, tariffs, the Iran war, and broken promises9:27 - George Washington's farewell warning: parties will destroy the nation12:49 - Curt's concerns about Thomas Massie: personal issues and impeachment grandstanding15:19 - Mike Johnson stepping down from House Republican leadership16:20 - JD Vance blames the Iran war for Republican losses, Trump says he'd do it again16:50 - Should Trump have gone to war without Congressional approval?21:33 - If the economy was fine, the war wouldn't have been the problem22:51 - Gerrymandering: both parties manipulate districts for special privilege23:59 - Sam's nonpartisan precinct proposal: why do we need partisan precincts at all?Call to Action: The party's over. Stop letting criminal parties carve up your vote and start holding every politician accountable to the Constitution, not their party agenda. Visit localhoneyman.com for honest honey from Curt Crosby, callforcivility.com to join Sam's movement, and share this episode with everyone who still thinks the two-party system has their back. God save our constitutional republic.

Sam Bushman hosts the Honest Money Report with Heath Perkins of Free Water Coin Co and Curt Crosby of Local Honey Man. Sam lays out his plan to abolish party precinct caucuses and replace them with nonpartisan neighborhood precincts, argues that gerrymandering is criminal on both sides, and questions whether Republicans intentionally lost to share power with Democrats. Heath breaks down gold at $4,104 and silver at $52 post-election, why market stalemate brings stability, how Oracle's $20 billion stock sale is essentially printing money, and why 90% constitutional silver from 1964 and earlier is still the best buy. Sam pitches the Trump Dollar: abolish the Federal Reserve and IRS, mint a one-ounce Silver Eagle as the new dollar. Plus, trade deficit narrowing from tariffs, Japan's unfair 100% tariff on American cars, and why Detroit was once 25% of world GDP. Timestamps: 0:17 - Sam's precinct plan: abolish party caucuses, use nonpartisan neighborhood precincts3:52 - Gerrymandering: Utah's mess of congressional districts6:41 - Gold at $4,104, silver at $52 post-election7:10 - Post-election market stability: divided government brings certainty8:28 - Did Republicans intentionally lose to share power?13:08 - Oracle selling $20 billion in stock: is it just printing money?15:17 - Paper play vs real value: you don't know the price until you sell18:25 - 90% constitutional silver still the best buy: dimes, quarters, halves from 1964 and earlier19:28 - Sam's Trump Dollar proposal: abolish the Fed and IRS, mint a Silver Eagle dollar20:55 - Trade deficit narrows: Trump's tariffs are working22:04 - Japan's 100% tariff on US cars: level the playing field; Detroit was 25% of world GDP23:30 - Curt's prediction: the Golden Age of America is coming Call to Action: Take control of your money before the next crisis. Visit freewatercoinco.com to learn about gold and silver from Heath Perkins, grab honest honey from Curt Crosby at localhoneyman.com, and check out Sam's Call For Civility at callforcivility.com. Share this episode with everyone who needs to understand why party politics is the problem and constitutional currency is the solution.

Sam Bushman and Sheriff Richard Mack react to Democrats sweeping both chambers of Congress with Alex Newman of Liberty Sentinel. Alex argues America is reaping what it has sown after decades of outsourcing children to government indoctrination centers, calls Trump delusional for claiming he would've won in a landslide, and says the GOP coalition collapsed over war betrayals and broken promises. They discuss Scott Jennings' silver lining that Obama lost big in 2010 but won in 2012, why the liberty movement always prospers more when out of power, Ron Paul's take that neither party deserves to win, and why the biggest threat to America is turning away from God. Alex makes the case for starting with your own home, homeschooling your children, and seeking first the kingdom. Timestamps: 0:23 - Post-election: Democrats control both chambers, everybody's a lame duck2:18 - Alex Newman: we're reaping what we've sown3:08 - Trump's coalition collapsed: wars, betrayals, and disgusted voters staying home3:55 - 85% of children indoctrinated by government schools: the inevitable result5:28 - Trump says he would've won in a landslide: delusional7:28 - Scott Jennings' silver lining: Obama lost big in 2010, won in 20128:43 - Sheriff Mack: Trump didn't deliver on education, nobody would help promote the book10:50 - The silver lining: the liberty movement prospers when out of power14:24 - Ron Paul: neither party embraces liberty18:37 - Biggest threat to America: turning away from God and His word20:19 - Liberty Counsel fighting: God writes the script, we must be obedient22:30 - Alex: start by changing your own life, homeschool your children Call to Action: The party's over, but the fight isn't. Join CSPOA at cspoa.org and get Sheriff Mack's book The Democrat Murder of America at murderofamerica.com. Visit libertysentinel.org for Alex Newman's work and his book Indoctrinating Our Children to Death. Stop sending your kids to government brainwashing camps, get involved in your local elections, and seek first the kingdom of God. Share this episode with every American who needs to hear that the real battle is spiritual.

Sam Bushman and Sheriff Richard Mack react to the Democrats sweeping the midterms and what it means for America. They're joined by Buddy Mason of Revelation Gold Group to break down why the stock market surged 1,100 points on election night, how fickle voters swung from Trump to Democrats in two years, and why George Washington warned that political parties would destroy the country. Buddy explains why gold at $4,038 and silver at $52 are still good buys, how precious metals outperformed bonds during the COVID crash, why central banks worldwide are buying 1,000 metric tons of gold per year, and how the Roman centurion analogy proves gold holds its value across millennia. Plus, a warning about fake precious metals scams and how to get started at sheriffmacmetals.com. Timestamps: 0:20 - Post-election reaction: the party's over, Democrats take power1:23 - Stock market surges 1,100 points: why3:08 - Election post-mortem: fickle voters and the pendulum swing5:03 - George Washington warned us that parties would destroy the country8:25 - Gold and silver as a safe haven in an uncertain world12:33 - Precious metals outperform bonds as a hedge: the COVID crash proof14:12 - Physical gold vs crypto and the coming digital dollar sneak attack15:30 - Gold at $4,038, silver at $52: still a good buy off its highs16:13 - World banks buying 1,000 metric tons of gold per year: what do they know?18:46 - The Roman centurion analogy: gold holds value across 2,000 years20:16 - How to get started: sheriffmacmetals.com and the education-first approach22:11 - Warning: fake precious metals scams and how to avoid themCall to Action: Protect what you've worked for with honest money. Visit sheriffmacmetals.com to get a free wealth guide and faithful steward guide from Revelation Gold Group, and learn why the world's biggest banks are hoarding gold. Join CSPOA at cspoa.org, grab Sheriff Mack's book The Democrat Murder of America at murderofamerica.com, and share this episode with everyone who needs to understand why constitutional currency matters more than which party won.

Sam Bushman hosts election day coverage with James Edwards of thepoliticalcesspool.org and Lew Moore of securevote.news. Sam declares he's not voting because parties are criminal, while early voting data shows apocalyptic swings against Republicans in Louisiana, North Carolina, and Florida. Lew breaks down how 20% of Trump voters are defecting or staying home over the war and the economy; James declares today marks the end of MAGA as a political movement, and betting odds give Democrats a 76% chance of taking the Senate. They trace the GOP's collapse from total dominance to near-wipeout in under two years, discuss whether it was intentional destruction, Lew argues the Israel lobby was the greatest beneficiary of MAGA's downfall, and they break down third-party dark money threatening to sink Republican races nationwide. Timestamps: 0:38 - Election day: Ron Paul says Republicans deserve to lose, Democrats don't deserve to win3:36 - Sam declares he's not voting: parties are criminal4:31 - Polls look apocalyptic for the GOP across the board5:38 - Early voting stats: massive swings against Republicans in Louisiana, North Carolina, Florida6:39 - Republicans feel betrayed by the war and the toxic economy7:28 - 20% of Trump voters defecting or staying home9:41 - Ron Paul: neither party offers liberty, sound money, or constitutional foreign policy11:36 - Epstein betrayal: broken promises and purging Massie and Greene13:30 - James: today is the end of MAGA as a political movement14:53 - Betting odds: 76% chance Democrats take the Senate17:12 - How did the GOP go from total dominance to collapse in under two years?19:47 - Lew: the Israel lobby was the greatest beneficiary of MAGA's destruction21:21 - Third-party dark money: Libertarian at 5% in Texas could sink Paxton23:05 - Newt Gingrich is wrong: his wife serves at Trump's pleasure Call to Action: This is the most important election of your lifetime, and they say that every time. Tune in to Liberty News Radio's live election night coverage tonight from 5 to 10 PM Mountain on Rumble, YouTube, X, and libertynewsradio.com. Visit securevote.news for election integrity reporting and thepoliticalcesspool.org for more from James Edwards. Share this episode with everyone who needs to understand why both parties failed America.