Advertise on podcast: Good Morning Liberty

Republicans call Democrats socialists. But what happens when their own answer is more spending, more subsidies, and a different plan for running your life? Nate and Charlie examine James Talarico's economic agenda and argue that the GOP has surrendered the free-market case against it. From corporate taxes and Trump's tariffs to housing subsidies, grocery assistance, and healthcare, we ask who ultimately pays when politicians promise to make everything affordable. We also discuss the rumors surrounding Talarico's campaign absence, his denial, and why personal attacks are a poor substitute for debating policy. Then we turn to Nick Shirley's Seattle EBT investigation, the disputed grocery-store allegations, and Charlie's challenge to the viral "one can of Spam" framing. That leads to a broader discussion of welfare incentives, benefit cliffs, and why eliminating fraud alone doesn't answer the libertarian objection to the system. Plus: Ken Paxton, Trump's rallies, and our argument that Republicans have helped create their own political problems. Join the Fed Haters Club for members-only conversations and support independent libertarian commentary: https://www.joingml.com   00:00 Opening banter and Nate's game-show recap 03:25 James Talarico: campaign rumors and his response 11:50 AI speculation and the GOP's missing argument 15:06 Corporate taxes, tariffs, and the cost of living 18:24 Healthcare, Medicare, and insurance competition 22:45 Texas polling, Ken Paxton, and "socialism light" 27:05 Trump's rallies and midterm expectations 29:02 Nick Shirley's EBT investigation 32:07 The disputed Spam claim and the store's response 38:40 Welfare incentives and benefit cliffs 40:12 Why Republicans lost the small-government argument 44:19 Closing and supporting GML   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com All GML links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links GML playlists: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Marten's Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Trump's $5,000 promise, Amazon's welfare numbers, and LA's mansion tax all raise the same question: who actually pays when politicians promise to help? It's another round of Dumb BLEEP of the Week, and Nate and Chuck are handing out criticism across party lines. They react to JD Vance's definition of socialism, challenge the defense of government checks as a tariff "dividend," and debate retirees' support for raising taxes on younger workers to protect Social Security benefits. Then it's Abdul El-Sayed's argument for public services, historical spending on schools and roads, and Robert Reich's criticism of Amazon. What can welfare-recipient counts actually tell us about wages, workforce growth, household size, and eligibility rules? Also on the list: the DOJ's campaign against antisemitism and its implications for free speech, Angie Nixon's call for a national rent freeze, and the reported consequences of LA's mansion tax. The episode closes with discussion of the disputed Cornell allegations, a proposed tuition-reimbursement bill, and the vote for the week's dumbest take. Join the Fed Haters Club for members-only conversations and support independent, liberty-minded commentary: https://www.joingml.com   00:00 Welcome to Dumb BLEEP of the Week 03:40 JD Vance tries to define socialism 07:15 Trump's $5,000 checks and partisan double standards 14:51 The DOJ's anti-hate tour and free speech 21:15 Social Security: Tax younger workers to protect retirees? 26:45 El-Sayed, public services, and how much we already spend 35:20 Robert Reich, Amazon, and the welfare numbers 44:44 Angie Nixon's national rent-freeze proposal 47:12 LA's mansion tax and unintended consequences 59:04 The Cornell case: Allegations, evidence, and uncertainty 01:05:28 The proposed tuition-reimbursement bill 01:08:57 Voting for the week's dumbest take   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com All links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Playlist 1: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Playlist 2: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Marten's Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

You paid into Social Security your whole life. But what did you actually buy, and who gets stuck paying when the promises outgrow the money? Nate and Charlie dig into the generational fight over Social Security, starting with a resurfaced Cato Institute poll and Matt Walsh's criticism of raising taxes on younger workers to protect retirees' benefits. The conversation goes beyond boomers versus millennials: how payroll taxes fund current benefits, what the trust funds actually hold, and why fewer workers per beneficiary make the math harder. We examine the gap between Social Security's popularity and the public's willingness to accept higher taxes or lower benefits, challenge familiar claims about fraud and immigration, and discuss the risk of financing promises through more borrowing and inflation. Then we compare Social Security with an illustrative private-investment scenario and debate opt-outs, lump-sum payments, and the painful transition any replacement would require. Our argument: take responsibility for your retirement instead of building your future around Washington's promises. Join the Fed Haters Club and support Good Morning Liberty: https://www.joingml.com   00:00 Welcome, AI hairlines, and episode 1832 01:25 The Social Security tax fight 07:15 How Social Security and the trust funds work 11:15 Shrinking reserves and planning your own retirement 19:15 Higher taxes, bigger benefits, and fewer workers 22:15 Why politicians keep postponing reform 25:05 Higher taxes even if younger workers get less? 28:43 Lump-sum payouts and the politics of reform 33:41 What Americans misunderstand about Social Security 37:55 Fraud, immigration, and the money-printing argument 41:50 Social Security versus private investing 44:39 Opt-outs, transition costs, and final thoughts   Cato's Social Security survey, published December 15, 2025: https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/new-poll-most-americans-expect-social-security-benefit-cuts-third-believe-program SSA's 2026 trustees report summary: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/TRSUM/tr26summary.pdf How Social Security's trust funds work: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/fundFAQ.html Historical Social Security tax rates: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/ProgData/oasdiRates.html Coverage reproducing the Matt Walsh post discussed: https://townhall.com/news/dmitri-bolt/2026/10/06/old-americans-overwhelmingly-support-taxing-younger-americans-to-fund-their-retirement-n2684138   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com All links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links GML playlists: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Marten's Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Trump promises $5,000 checks. A federal judge pushes back on a warrantless Flock search. Both stories raise the same question: where are the limits on government power? Nate and Chuck unpack the White House's anti-socialism messaging alongside Trump's proposed "dividend," asking why borrowing and spending suddenly become acceptable when Republicans are doing it. They discuss tariffs, federal deficits, investment promises, and why calling a government payout a dividend doesn't answer the question of who pays for it. Then, an Oklahoma ruling against a warrantless license-plate database search sparks a deeper argument about privacy, policing, and the Fourth Amendment. Is requiring a warrant enough when a searchable record of your movements already exists? Where does observing a car in public become tracking someone's life? And what's the libertarian answer when private companies build surveillance networks for government customers? From election-year checks to roadside cameras, we question the excuses for bigger government, even when they come from the supposedly smaller-government side. Join the Fed Haters Club for members-only conversations and weekly voting on the dumbest political takes: https://www.joingml.com   00:00 Trump's $5,000 promise and welcome 01:05 Midterm strategy and the lesser-evil argument 04:00 The White House's anti-socialism campaign 09:13 Trump's checks, tariffs, and economic promises 12:08 Election strategy and the $21 trillion investment claim 15:06 Is the "Trump dividend" actually a dividend? 17:22 Tariff revenue, deficits, and who pays 20:36 A judge rules against a warrantless Flock search 26:17 Privacy in public and the Fourth Amendment 30:03 Why a warrant requirement may not be enough 31:49 Private companies, public funding, and surveillance 36:21 Join the conversation and support GML   White House anti-socialism page discussed in the episode: https://www.whitehouse.gov/socialism/ The White House Original White House announcement of the proposed Trump dividend, providing background rather than the exact replayed clip: https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/09/trump-dividend-america-is-winning-and-americans-should-win-with-it/ The White House 404 Media reporting read during the Flock discussion: https://www.404media.co/federal-judge-rules-a-flock-search-was-indiscriminate-mass-surveillance-and-unconstitutional/ 404media.co   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com All links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Marten's Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Why do some young Americans care deeply about politics, then sit out elections? What happens when neither major party feels like it represents them? Josh Martens welcomes Alejandro Ramos, founder and executive director of the Ramos Research Institute, to examine the frustration behind youth voter disengagement. Drawing on CIRCLE research and his conversations with young people, Alejandro discusses registration confusion, competing work demands, distrust, and the gap between posting online and participating in civic life. Josh challenges older generations to take housing costs, education costs, and Social Security seriously. Together, they explore why dismissing those concerns can make socialism more appealing, why name-calling shuts down useful conversations, and how civic education can help people think independently. They also discuss third-party voting and Alejandro's expectations for the midterms before turning to Cuba. With family still on the island, Alejandro explains his perspective, while Josh questions whether sanctions and military intervention can deliver the freedom Cubans deserve. Join the Fed Haters Club and support Good Morning Liberty: https://www.joingml.com #GoodMorningLiberty #GenZ #Libertarian 00:00 Meet Alejandro Ramos 01:05 His family's escape from Cuba 05:09 Why young people struggle to participate 09:00 Does your vote matter? 14:52 Neither party represents me 22:13 Housing, Social Security and generational frustration 26:51 Socialism, populism and political name-calling 33:03 Teaching the why behind political beliefs 39:56 Four pillars of civic education 45:25 The midterms and third-party voting 52:57 Cuba: sanctions, intervention and freedom 1:06:33 Where to find Alejandro's work Ramos Research Institute: https://www.ramosresearchinstitute.org/ The Informed Observer: https://alejandrojramos.substack.com/ LinkedIn- https://www.linkedin.com/in/alejandroramos0515/ My bio page - https://www.ramosresearchinstitute.org/ajr Email  - [email protected] CIRCLE: Young People and the 2024 Election: https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/2024-poll-barriers-issues-economy CIRCLE: Youth Voter Turnout in 2024: https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/new-data-nearly-half-youth-voted-2024 People vs. Politics documentary: https://www.peoplevspolitics.com/

Can a viral rent chart change the entire argument about capitalism and socialism? And can a government college-loan reform end up costing taxpayers even more? Nate and Chuck are back for Dumb Bleep of the Week, digging into Mamdani's conversation with Theo Von about socialism, affordability, housing, and what it means to guarantee a "dignified" life. They also break down arguments about billionaires, stock-market investing, CEO compensation, and whether the wealth debate survives some basic math. Then the show turns to the Trump administration's college-loan rule. The hosts examine what the rule does, why critics say it restricts educational choices, and why its incentives may not work the way supporters expect. Also in the mix: Bernie Sanders' wealth statistics, a proposal to cap student-loan interest, Brandon Herrera and the Communist Manifesto, an anti-MAGA kitten rescue fighting with PETA, and another debate over how much Trump's MAGA base tells us about the broader electorate. Follow the show, leave a rating or review, comment where available, and share the episode with someone who loves arguing about economics, government incentives, and political absurdity.   00:00 Off-Brand Cola and the Friday Show Begins 02:45 Mamdani, Theo Von, and the Rent Chart Debate 08:45 What Does Mamdani Mean by Socialism? 18:15 Theo Von on Capitalism, Corporations, and the 1% 23:30 Billionaires, Investing, and the Stock Market 27:45 Bill Burr, CEO Pay, and Worker Wages 32:15 Trump's College Loan Rule and the Backlash 41:30 Why the Loan Rule Could Cost Taxpayers More 46:45 The 2% Student Loan Interest Proposal 50:00 Bernie Sanders and the Wealth Statistics Fight 57:00 Anti-MAGA Kittens and the PETA Fight 01:03:15 Trump, MAGA Support, and the Broader Electorate   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com GML Bio Link: https://gml.bio.link All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Trump says prices are going down. Your grocery receipt might have a different opinion. Meanwhile, Republicans and libertarians are discovering just how fragile their 2024 coalition may have been. Nate and Chuck break down Trump's comments on inflation, prices, the stock market, and the promises that helped bring libertarian voters into his coalition. Then they get into Megyn Basham's criticism that libertarians are "useless" coalition partners who fight for the wrong things. The bigger question is whether the Republican Party can still call itself the party of small government, free markets, constitutional limits, and opposition to endless war while expanding federal spending and government power. The guys also dig into why libertarians can be difficult political allies: they tend to care more about reducing government than protecting a party, politician, or coalition. Plus: $68 grocery runs, 18D chess, Republican socialism, taxpayer-funded political messaging, COVID-era libertarian infighting, and why telling voters what they want to hear is such an effective political strategy. Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, share the show, leave a comment, and leave us a rating or review on your podcast app. #Libertarian #Politics #SmallGovernment #Inflation #Trump Chapters 00:00 Good Morning Liberty 01:45 Nate's Weekend From Hell 03:30 What Happened in Politics This Weekend? 05:15 Politicians, Supporters, and the Political Lie 06:30 Trump Says Prices Are Going Down 10:30 What the Inflation Numbers Actually Show 17:15 The $68 Grocery Store Reality Check 18:15 Trump's "Final Battle" Ad 22:30 Megyn Basham vs. Libertarians 27:15 The One Thing Libertarians Actually Want 31:30 Is Government-Enforced Virtue Really Virtue? 38:00 COVID, the Libertarian Party, and the GOP Divide 40:30 Why Libertarians Are Becoming a Problem for Republicans 43:45 Small Government, Free Markets, and Republican Socialism 45:45 Final Thoughts and Wrap-Up Links Join GML: https://www.joingml.com GML Bio Links: https://gml.bio.link All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

A mask-optional Saturday nearly tears apart a lesbian bar, and somehow the story ends with clown school. Charlie laughs so hard he can barely speak, but that is only one entry in this week's Dumb Bleep competition. Nate and Charlie break down Bill Burr's argument about AI replacing workers and CEOs, the claim that money is a fixed pie, and what regulation actually does to competition. They also dig into gas and diesel prices, the online conspiracy theories surrounding oil markets, and the proposed diesel export ban. Then comes Trump's decision to ban CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House, a Converse ad accused online of resembling KKK imagery, Sunny Hostin's wild jury-duty story, Ted Cruz asking libertarians to turn out, and Benjamin Netanyahu declaring that you will not find anyone more libertarian than him. And then there is Last Ditch, where changing the mask rules produced accusations of ableism, inaccessible Instagram apologies, a three-and-a-half-hour community meeting, "white they/them tears," and one unforgettable career move. Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, like the show, comment with your Dumb Bleep winner, share it with a friend, and leave a rating or review on your podcast app.   00:00 Charlie's Birthday and Dumb Bleep Begins 04:45 Bill Burr on AI, CEOs, and Capitalism 17:14 Diesel Export Bans and Gas Price Conspiracies 26:45 Trump Bans Media Outlets From the White House 35:14 The Converse Ad Racism Controversy 43:30 The Mask-Optional Lesbian Bar Meltdown 57:14 The Clown School Reveal Breaks Charlie 01:07:22 Sunny Hostin's Wild Jury Story 01:11:14 Ted Cruz Wants Libertarians Back 01:19:32 Netanyahu: "You Won't Find Anyone More Libertarian Than Me" 01:21:48 Dumb Bleep Winner and Final Vote   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com GML Bio Links: https://gml.bio.link All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Republicans are looking for a quick answer to soaring diesel prices, and one idea gaining support is a ban on U.S. diesel exports. Nate and Charlie break down why that seemingly simple fix could create a much bigger economic mess. They dig into diesel markets, refinery capacity, global supply, the Jones Act, price gouging claims, and the unintended consequences that can follow when politicians try to override market prices. The episode also looks back at Nixon's 1973 soybean embargo and the long-term lesson Nate argues it offers for anyone who thinks export restrictions come without consequences. Then the conversation turns to war, energy prices, Washington incentives, and why politicians so often end up proposing solutions to problems government helped create. Later, Nate and Charlie preview a ProPublica investigation involving Susan Collins, military contractors, campaign contributions, and an FBI anti-corruption investigation, while noting the allegations and denials discussed in the reporting. Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, leave a rating or review, and share the show with someone who enjoys economics, liberty, markets, and questioning government power. Comment with your take: would banning diesel exports actually help consumers, or just move the cost somewhere else? Chapters 00:00 Welcome to Good Morning Liberty 02:00 Republicans Target Diesel Prices 04:00 The Push to Ban U.S. Diesel Exports 06:00 Trump Backs the Diesel Export Idea 08:45 Why America Imports and Exports Diesel 12:20 War, Supply, and the Price Gouging Argument 22:00 The 1973 Soybean Embargo Lesson 27:45 Energy Secretary Pushes Back on an Export Ban 30:30 What Happens When Diesel Storage Fills Up 34:00 Price Controls and Unintended Consequences 40:00 Greed, Government, and Rising Fuel Prices 49:00 Susan Collins Investigation Preview Links Join GML: https://www.joingml.com GML Bio Link: https://gml.bio.link All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Expensive gas? Apparently your latte is the problem. Government helping the politically connected? Apparently the answer is more government. Nate and Chuck take apart the messaging around Donald Trump, rising gas prices, and the Iran war, from the "small price to pay" defense to the argument that anyone buying coffee or DoorDash should stop complaining. They challenge the choice being presented to voters and ask whatever happened to congressional debate over going to war. Then it's Jimmy Dore's viral "socialism for the rich" argument. The guys agree that corporate bailouts deserve criticism, but argue that giving Washington more control repeats the underlying mistake. Along the way, they discuss inflation, wealth creation, Medicare, health insurance denials, and claims about who pays for AI data centers. On the menu: Your coffee budget isn't a defense of foreign policy. "Two weeks from a nuke" gets a closer look. Bank bailouts are not a free-market success story. Stop arguing over how Washington spends your money long enough to ask why it took it. Follow or subscribe to Good Morning Liberty, like and comment where available, and share this with someone defending their team's spending. Leave a podcast rating or review, and tell us: If government keeps picking winners, why give it more power? Chapters 00:00 Gas Prices, War, and Government Excuses 04:00 Trump's "Small Price to Pay" Gas Defense 05:15 What If Congress Voted on War? 10:15 Inflation Messaging vs. Your Grocery Bill 17:15 Stop Blaming Coffee and DoorDash 23:00 Challenging the Iran War Justification 30:15 Jimmy Dore's "Socialism for the Rich" 34:45 Taxes, Wealth, and the Fixed-Pie Argument 39:30 The Case for Separating Economy and State 43:15 Stop Taking the Money in the First Place 47:30 Medicare, Insurance Denials, and Healthcare Costs 53:30 Who Pays for AI Data Centers?     All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Join GML: https://joingml.com GML Link Hub: https://gml.bio.link Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/ GML Merch: https://godhatesfeds.com

Could "protect the children" become the argument for making everyone identify themselves online? A libertarian in London has a warning for Americans who think it cannot happen here. Josh Martens sits down with Samiksha Bhattacharjee, a Young Voices contributor and president of the University College London Libertarian Society, to discuss UK online safety rules, digital ID, age verification, and anonymous speech. Samiksha argues that British organizations are promoting similar approaches in the United States, with consequences that could reach beyond children's accounts. The conversation follows the incentives behind online regulation: lawmakers promise safety, companies face pressure to standardize their rules, and parents risk losing authority to politicians. Josh and Samiksha also discuss her claims about lobbying and public funding, and why First Amendment protections do not end the debate over online privacy. Key beats: Could state laws reshape the internet for everyone? What disappears when online anonymity disappears? Would you trust the opposing party to make decisions for your child? They finish with a challenge for the liberty movement: reach young people through culture, explain individual freedom, and stop expecting a political superhero to fix everything. Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, like, share, and comment: should protecting children require adults to identify themselves online? Leave a podcast rating or review to help more people find the show. Samiksha Bhattacharjee (https://samikshabhattacharjee.github.io/index.html) https://x.com/samikshassotd?s=11&t=S8JoQpY3m4n6bFrTo8tLrg How U.K. Operatives Are Exporting Censorship To Twenty-One States (https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-u-k-operatives-are-exporting-censorship-to-twenty-one-states) Chapters 00:00 Meet Samiksha Bhattacharjee 01:45 Her Path to Classical Liberalism 05:45 Could UK Online Rules Spread to America? 09:00 Anonymous Speech and America's Founding 11:15 UK Speech Policing: Samiksha's Account 14:30 Cross-Party Resistance to Digital ID 16:15 First Amendment Limits and NGO Lobbying 20:30 Child Safety and Control of Your Devices 22:30 How State Laws Could Set National Standards 25:30 Parents or Politicians? The Child-Safety Test 27:15 Making Liberty Reach Young People 33:15 Follow Samiksha's Work Links All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Join GML: https://joingml.com GML Link Hub: https://gml.bio.link Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

**First upload had an error with Spotify, so we are trying to push it out again**   Trump says a trade deficit is basically a loss, and America could make $1.5 trillion by simply cutting off trade. There's just one problem: that's not how trade works. It's Dumb Bleep of the Week, and nobody gets a free pass. Nate and Charlie break down Trump's argument for cutting trade with countries where America runs a deficit, why voluntary trade creates value, and what bringing every bit of production back home would actually mean for prices and living standards. Then it's Mitch McConnell, the political spin surrounding higher gas prices, reactions to Thomas Massie's effort to impeach Pete Hegseth, and a CNN argument over tariffs and corporate income taxes. Plus: Abdul El-Sayed wants government action on football ticket prices, Bernie Sanders jumps into the Macklemore controversy, and the Lindsey Clancy discourse somehow gets even more insane. Which one deserves Dumb Bleep of the Week? Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, leave a rating or review, and share the show with someone who still thinks politicians understand economics. 00:00 Dumb Bleep of the Week 02:15 Trump's Trade Deficit Argument 05:15 What a Trade Deficit Actually Means 08:00 Why Voluntary Trade Creates Value 14:15 Take the Trade Argument Down to Your Household 19:00 Mitch McConnell 28:45 Gas Prices and Political Blame 41:00 Thomas Massie, Pete Hegseth and War Powers 49:45 CNN Debates Tariffs and Corporate Taxes 59:15 Abdul El-Sayed Takes on Football Ticket Prices 01:05:15 Macklemore, Bernie Sanders and Free Speech 01:13:15 The Lindsey Clancy Discourse 01:22:15 Voting for Dumb Bleep of the Week   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links GML Bio Link: https://gml.bio.link Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Trump says a trade deficit is basically a loss, and America could make $1.5 trillion by simply cutting off trade. There's just one problem: that's not how trade works. It's Dumb Bleep of the Week, and nobody gets a free pass. Nate and Charlie break down Trump's argument for cutting trade with countries where America runs a deficit, why voluntary trade creates value, and what bringing every bit of production back home would actually mean for prices and living standards. Then it's Mitch McConnell, the political spin surrounding higher gas prices, reactions to Thomas Massie's effort to impeach Pete Hegseth, and a CNN argument over tariffs and corporate income taxes. Plus: Abdul El-Sayed wants government action on football ticket prices, Bernie Sanders jumps into the Macklemore controversy, and the Lindsey Clancy discourse somehow gets even more insane. Which one deserves Dumb Bleep of the Week? Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, leave a rating or review, and share the show with someone who still thinks politicians understand economics. 00:00 Dumb Bleep of the Week 02:15 Trump's Trade Deficit Argument 05:15 What a Trade Deficit Actually Means 08:00 Why Voluntary Trade Creates Value 14:15 Take the Trade Argument Down to Your Household 19:00 Mitch McConnell 28:45 Gas Prices and Political Blame 41:00 Thomas Massie, Pete Hegseth and War Powers 49:45 CNN Debates Tariffs and Corporate Taxes 59:15 Abdul El-Sayed Takes on Football Ticket Prices 01:05:15 Macklemore, Bernie Sanders and Free Speech 01:13:15 The Lindsey Clancy Discourse 01:22:15 Voting for Dumb Bleep of the Week   Join GML: https://www.joingml.com All GML Links: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/links GML Bio Link: https://gml.bio.link Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Thomas Massie introduced eight articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth, including allegations involving the Iran war, congressional war powers, military action in Yemen, and other actions discussed in the resolution. Then New York City's planned government-run grocery stores face an antitrust lawsuit, creating the rare antitrust case Nate actually enjoys. We break down Massie's impeachment case and the constitutional fight over who gets to take America to war. Congress passed a War Powers Resolution directing an end to hostilities in Iran, while the administration disputes the constitutionality of that mechanism. Then we dig into the lawsuit challenging Zohran Mamdani's government grocery-store plan. Can a private grocery store compete when its government-backed competitor can use taxpayer funding to subsidize lower prices? And does that actually make groceries cheaper, or just change how consumers pay for them? Plus: predatory pricing, grocery-store margins, socialist reactions, government subsidies, and why artificially lowering the price at checkout does not necessarily lower the underlying cost. Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, like, comment, and share the show. If you're listening on a podcast app, leave us a rating or review. #Libertarian #WarPowers #PeteHegseth #ThomasMassie #Mamdani #Economics Chapters 00:00 Good Morning Liberty 01:09 Massie Moves to Impeach Pete Hegseth 04:02 The 8 Articles of Impeachment 05:11 Congress Orders an End to the Iran War 08:41 Civilian Protections, Drug Boats, and Free Speech 13:18 Kidnapping a Foreign Leader and the Yemen War 16:20 Should the Impeachment Actually Pass? 18:42 The Constitution and the War Powers Fight 25:11 Mamdani's Government Grocery Stores Get Sued 29:24 The Antitrust Case Against New York City 31:29 Is Government Pricing Actually Predatory? 36:20 Socialists React to the Grocery Store Lawsuit 39:34 Who Actually Pays for "Cheap" Government Groceries? 46:35 What Happens If Government Becomes the Grocery Store? 51:23 Final Thoughts and Good Morning Liberty

Gas prices are climbing, AI executives want to slow down the industry, and somehow the proposed solution keeps coming back to giving government more power. This episode asks the question libertarians should always ask: what incentives are actually driving the people demanding regulation? Nate and Chuck break down the latest gas price spike, disruptions to oil transportation, and why higher diesel costs can ripple through the prices of almost everything consumers buy. Then they tackle the political blame game over rising gas prices and whether voters will hold Republicans accountable. The bigger fight is artificial intelligence. Anthropic's Dario Amodei is calling for the AI industry to "pace the frontier," while Sam Altman and Elon Musk express support for concerns about AI development. Hillary Clinton wants government coordination and even cooperation with China. The guys examine whether legitimate AI safety concerns are becoming an excuse for regulation that protects established companies from competition. Plus: cybersecurity, open-source AI, government surveillance, Terminator, humanoid robots, nuclear hypotheticals, and the timeless political promise that printing more money will somehow make everyone richer. Subscribe or follow, like, comment, and share the show. If you listen on a podcast app, leave GML a rating or review. #Libertarian #AI #GasPrices #Government #FreeMarkets