Advertise on podcast: Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst

Send us Fan Mail This Best of Get in the Game episode brings together standout insights from leading plaintiff trial attorneys on what it really takes to prepare, frame, and try high-stakes cases. Featuring clips from Rex Parris, Dale Galipo, Ben Cloward, Keith Mitnik, John Uustal, Arash Homampour, Benjamin Crump, Russell Nicolet, and others, this episode highlights the practical trial wisdom, preparation habits, and courtroom strategies that shape powerful plaintiff advocacy. What This Episode Covers How jurors read lawyers, clients, and the courtroom before testimony beginsWhy simple, direct storytelling matters in the age of short attention spansHow to address bad facts, bias, and juror skepticism earlyWhy focus groups and mock juries help reveal hidden case weaknessesHow voir dire can uncover subtle bias without making jurors defensiveWhy opening statements must give jurors context for the evidenceHow authenticity, visual storytelling, and damages confidence shape persuasionWhy venue-specific preparation matters in serious plaintiff casesHow collaboration within the plaintiff bar strengthens trial strategy

Send us Fan Mail The idea that one piece of evidence wins a case is a myth. The trial lawyers securing the most significant verdicts today operate with a different understanding. Jurors do not decide cases based on facts alone. They decide based on how those facts are framed, sequenced, and ultimately understood. This episode distills insights from some of the most respected plaintiff trial lawyers in the country, all featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish. It highlights the strategic shift from instinct-driven advocacy to structured, data-informed trial preparation. In this episode, you’ll learn: Why evidence alone is not persuasive without the right interpretive frameworkHow sequencing and narrative architecture influence liability decisionsWhat jurors retain and why most information is lost without structureHow leading trial teams use focus groups and behavioral data to test cases in advanceWhy traditional emotional appeals can limit damages instead of increasing themHow to position damages as a question of value and justice, not just compensationFeaturing insights from: Ben Cloward Keith Mitnik John Taylor Arash Homampour Dale Galipo Rex Parris Russell Nicolet John Uustal Benjamin Crump Each of these trial lawyers has been featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish, where they break down their approach to high-stakes litigation and verdict strategy. 👉 Explore their full conversations in their respective episodes:  https://getinthegame.juryanalyst.com/

Send us Fan Mail The upcoming podcast from our sister department group discusses a significant shift in how legal trials are prepared, indicating a departure from past methods. This transformation is driven by the emergence of advanced tools, which are fundamentally changing the approach to trial readiness. As a result, a growing disparity is observed between conventional, often experience-based preparation and newer, scientifically-backed methodologies. Relying on outdated, anecdotal strategies is becoming increasingly disadvantageous as more sophisticated, data-driven techniques gain prominence in the legal field. https://scienceofjustice.com/

Send us Fan Mail  Brian Panish interviews Carmen Balber, the Executive Director of Consumer Watchdog, a nonprofit organization focused on protecting the interests of consumers and holding corporations accountable. Carmen has been a powerful voice in the fight for consumer rights, particularly in the areas of insurance, healthcare, and corporate responsibility.

Send us Fan Mail What separates truly exceptional trial lawyers from the rest? It's rarely what they teach in law school. Six accomplished courtroom veterans—Brian Panish, Sean Flaherty, Keith Mitnik, Jason Leonard, John Uustal, and Joshua Koskoff—share candid insights drawn from decades of high-stakes litigation. Their collective wisdom forms a practical roadmap for attorneys at any stage, but especially those working to establish themselves in the challenging world of trial advocacy. The journey begins earlier than many realize. These attorneys emphasize the transformative power of immersing yourself in legal practice during law school, absorbing the unwritten rules and developing intuitive skills through proximity and observation. Yet they remain refreshingly honest about the timeline—expect to "tread water" for several years before hitting your stride. Even veterans with decades of experience admit to experiencing pre-trial anxiety. The difference? They've learned to function effectively despite it. For new lawyers preparing for their first courtroom experiences, the advice challenges conventional wisdom. Perfection isn't necessary—authenticity is. When you thoroughly prepare and genuinely believe in your case, minor technical imperfections actually make you more relatable to jurors. This permission to be human while maintaining high professional standards liberates attorneys to focus on what truly matters: thorough preparation, strategic case framing, and passionate advocacy. Beyond the courtroom, success requires intentional networking, exceptional client service, and embracing collaborative approaches. The strongest advocates recognize that mentorship and knowledge-sharing create collective strength against well-resourced opponents. Through every challenge, maintaining your authentic voice while incorporating lessons from those who came before creates a sustainable foundation for a meaningful career in trial law. Ready to transform your approach to trial advocacy? Subscribe now for more practical insights from the profession's most accomplished practitioners.

Send us Fan Mail When high-stakes trials involve punitive damages, the real battle often begins long before opening statements. In this episode, we unpack the overlooked art of selecting a jury that’s equipped—not just to assess liability—but to deliver meaningful punishment when it's warranted. From religious objections to financial bias, from voir dire blind spots to strategic pretrial motions, we explore how trial lawyers can avoid critical mistakes and build a jury prepared for both phases of trial. Featuring insights from guest expert Sean Simpson, author of Punitive Damages: The Lawyer’s Tool for Shaping Society, this episode reveals why jury selection is never just about liability—it’s about everything that comes after.

Send us Fan Mail The first words in a trial can make or break your case. This Best of episode analyzes some of the top litigators' most compelling opening statements. Learn how expert trial lawyers use storytelling, framing, and strategic pacing to build trust, dismantle defenses, and ensure jurors see the case from their perspective from the very start. Listen to some of the greats as they talk to Panish about it all.

Send us Fan Mail This podcast episode discusses California wildfire litigation, focusing on the legal claims, evidence, and challenges in proving liability against utility companies. Plaintiff attorneys describe common claims (negligence and inverse condemnation), damages (property destruction, landscaping, economic and non-economic losses), and the difficulties of proving liability due to destroyed evidence. The bankruptcy of PG&E is examined as a case study, highlighting the unfairness of the bankruptcy system for wildfire victims. Finally, watch a preview replay(Prior to the 2025 LA Wildfires) of a full interview with plaintiff attorneys Mike Kelly and Gerry Singleton, who have extensive backgrounds in fire litigation.

Send us Fan Mail Unlock courtroom success with our latest podcast episode, where we explore the innovative Jury Simulator tool transforming trial preparation. Learn how machine intelligence creates virtual focus groups with AI-powered jurors, enabling attorneys to test and refine their strategies in a sophisticated and cost-effective manner. Hear firsthand from lawyers who use this technology to anticipate juror reactions and uncover case weaknesses, while AI analyzes demographic data, social media activity, and cognitive biases to provide a realistic glimpse into jury behavior. Discover how the Jury Simulator blends human insight with machine intelligence to enhance legal strategies, from virtual focus groups to real-time feedback during depositions, revolutionizing legal practice and paving the way for a future where technology and tradition work together to ensure fairer, more informed judicial decisions. For a deeper dive into these groundbreaking advancements and their impact on the legal field, listen to the full story on our sister podcast station, Science of Justice. Gain exclusive insights, expert interviews, and comprehensive analyses that will enrich your understanding of how technology is reshaping justice. Learn more @ https://scienceofjustice.com/

Send us Fan Mail Listen to the full episode at : ScienceofJustice.com  At the SoJ, we believe in simplifying legal proceedings while prioritizing unbiased examination of evidence and human experience. Through our expert interviews, we provide valuable insight into juror perception, enabling informed decision-making. Our focus on Real Science, Real Data, in Real-Time ensures accuracy and timeliness. New episodes at ScienceofJustice.com

Send us Fan Mail In this monumental episode join Brian, Dr.Chris, and the real-life Moneyball stars as they discuss how the advanced strategy used in professional sports can also be applied in the courtroom. Learn how to optimize your case for maximum value by using analytics to identify the strongest arguments, evidence, and even team members.   So if you’re looking to take your courtroom strategy to the next level, don’t miss this episode! Tune in now to get an inside look at how the "teams" use data-driven litigation strategies. Hear stories of success and failures, tips and tricks to help you succeed, and gain insight into how analytics are critical tools for today's practitioners.

Send us Fan Mail Brian Beckcom is a trial lawyer with years of experience under his belt. Specializing in Maritime law,  he made headlines for representing the interests of Richard Phillips in  Abdiwali Abdiqadir Muse  - the trial made famous by Tom Hanks' portrayal of 'Captain Phillips'. As a result, companies began to employ independent security contractors to protect their vessels and crews and saw their safety & profit margins improve. In our exclusive interview, trial lawyer Brian Beckcom will share his insights into Maritime law and discuss the implications of applying data science to trial preparation.

Send us Fan Mail When it comes to trials, the stories you tell can make or break your case. Whether it's the story of a BP/Deepwater Horizon explosion, a George Floyd Civil Rights Case, or even two back-to-back Bakersfield record verdicts, we've seen the power of storytelling in courtrooms time and time again. It's not just about what you say—it's about how you say it. When you're crafting your argument during trial, you need to think about more than just facts: You need to consider how those facts will affect jurors' opinions and judgments of your client. In order to do this effectively, you need to be able to craft compelling narratives that connect with people on an emotional level—and that's where our team comes in to measure that impact before your actual delivery! Panel: Jeffery Breit @  Breit Biniazan  Daniel Rodriguez @ Rodriguez & Associates Antonio Romanucci @ Romanucci & Blandin

Send us Fan Mail Bonus Track - [Office Hours] Russell Nicolet and I take a look at what makes a good case summary and how this fits into an overall strategy for a mock jury or big data research focus groups.  About the speakers here: Russell Nicolet is the founder and managing partner at his family's law practice with over a dozen offices throughout MN & WI dedicated to helping his clients and other plaintiff lawyers through innovative industry collaborations.   Dr. Christopher Brydges is an accomplished Behavioral Scientist at Jury Analyst with experience in market research, data analytics, and survey design. Christopher holds a Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Western Australia and is an internationally recognized expert in the field of behavioral statistics and research design. With over ten years of experience in academia and working as a statistician internationally, he has published 39 peer-reviewed papers to date.

Send us Fan Mail Kenneth Foard McCallion a Former DOJ/NY State Prosecutor and still top civil litigation attorney discusses his newest book with another world-class attorney John Uustal, our show host. Listen to some of the behind-the-scenes landmark legal cases of our time.  John and Ken compare their sovereign immunity breakdowns.