Advertise on podcast: News For Reasonable People

California spent $236 million on Gavin Newsom's Care Court program—supposedly a "completely new paradigm" to get the severely mentally ill off the streets and into treatment. The result? A whopping 22 people were involuntarily placed into care. That's $10.7 million per person. Even if you count the 684 voluntary participants (which completely misses the program's entire point), you're still looking at $345,000 per person. Meanwhile, California has over 187,000 homeless people, many with severe mental illness who desperately need help.Newsom's office insists they've helped thousands, but the numbers tell a different story. Critics call it exactly what it is: a costly bureaucratic maze run by a homeless industrial complex that profits from the problem never getting solved. It's like a diet company that doesn't want you to lose weight. Since 2019, California has blown through $37 billion on homelessness, and it's arguably gotten worse.Is anyone surprised the math isn't mathing? How do you defend this level of waste and failure? Drop your thoughts below, and if you're tired of watching taxpayer money disappear into the void, subscribe for more accountability coverage.

A year after the LA wildfires turned entire neighborhoods into ash, fewer than a dozen homes are actually rebuilt while politicians throw confetti over issuing 1,600 permits out of 16,000 destroyed structures. That's a whopping 10% permit rate—truly lightning speed by California standards! Governor Newsom brags about "historic pace" while the median permit time sits at 51 days compared to Texas's 8 days, and survivors cite the real problem: insurance companies playing hardball and zero federal disaster aid from the $34 billion request gathering dust. Meanwhile, Trump signs an executive order to cut permitting red tape, Newsom fires back with snarky tweets about rebuilding Mars, and Mayor Bass—who was in Ghana when the fires started—claims victory for cutting permit times in half (still embarrassingly slow). Seven out of ten fire survivors remain displaced and running out of money while bureaucrats argue over jurisdiction. Is this executive order actually going to override local permitting chaos, or is it just federal overreach theater? Will insurance companies stop lowballing victims, or will this turn into a decades-long rebuild nightmare? Drop your thoughts below, and subscribe to follow this bureaucratic dumpster fire as it unfolds

Seattle's downtown office vacancy just hit a record 39.1%—nearly four out of every ten commercial spaces are empty. But sure, let's keep blaming remote work instead of the real culprits: sky-high taxes, a millionaire tax driving out wealth, America's highest minimum wage killing restaurants, and a mayor who's never successfully run anything now experimenting with socialist grocery stores. Meanwhile, Amazon and Microsoft are fleeing to Bellevue, tech layoffs are accelerating, and "McStabbies" remains a worldwide symbol of Seattle's public safety disaster. The city has one of America's most beautiful settings overlooking Puget Sound, yet businesses are choosing literally anywhere else. When private companies can't make the math work and your solution is more taxes and DEI hires, you're not in a "struggle"—you're in a self-inflicted economic nosedive. Is anyone surprised that 40 years of Democrat control produced the highest vacancy rate in North America? How much more evidence do Seattle voters need that these policies destroy prosperity? Drop your thoughts below, and if you're tired of watching beautiful cities commit economic suicide, subscribe for more reality checks the mainstream media won't give you.

The Small Business Administration (SBA) has banned over 1,000 firms from receiving no-bid contracts after they failed to provide anti-fraud documents. These firms, participating in the 8(a) program intended for disadvantaged businesses, received over $5 billion in federal funds in the last four years. SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler stated the action aims to dismantle discriminatory practices and combat fraud within DEI programs. The move follows increased scrutiny of the 8(a) program, including Senate hearings and reports highlighting widespread fraud and abuse. Under the law, a percentage of contracts are reserved for disadvantaged businesses. This action by the SBA signifies a significant effort to ensure accountability and prevent the misuse of taxpayer dollars within government contracting programs. The crackdown is welcome news for those concerned about fair competition and the integrity of government spending.

Seattle just elected a socialist mayor while simultaneously pushing a statewide millionaire's tax AND a corporate payroll tax—as Amazon and Meta announce thousands of layoffs. What could possibly go wrong? This is the perfect storm of economic suicide: tech companies already bleeding jobs due to AI disruption, a downtown core that's been obliterated, and politicians who think boycotting hometown companies like Starbucks is good leadership. We're watching the fastest way to turn a booming tech hub into the next Detroit. Amazon's already moving employees to Bellevue to escape Seattle's madness, and 21 out of 23 relocation clients are fleeing the region entirely. When you layer new taxes on top of record unemployment, guess who pays the price? Spoiler alert: it's not the millionaires—they'll just leave, dumping the tax burden onto the middle and lower classes who can't afford to escape. Is this the scariest economic moment since the Great Recession, or just what happens when socialists get the keys? How long before Seattle turns out the lights like they did in 1971? Drop your predictions below, and if you're tired of watching cities self-destruct in real-time, smash that subscribe button.

New York City's new socialist mayor just announced his brilliant solution to a $12 billion deficit: tax the rich into oblivion and hope they don't notice. Mayor Zoran Mdani wants to slap a 2% tax hike on millionaires while promising $10 billion in freebies—universal childcare, free buses, the whole progressive wishlist. Meanwhile, he's citing a study claiming wealthy New Yorkers leave at one-fourth the rate of other income brackets. Does that honestly make sense when socialists are actively painting targets on their backs? We break down the mayor's blame-shifting strategy, his refusal to cut a single bloated program, and the uncomfortable fact that the top 1% already pays 40-48% of NYC's tax revenue. What happens when those private planes start heading to Florida? Spoiler alert: the middle class gets stuck holding the bag. Is this fiscal policy or fiscal suicide? Will New York's millionaires stick around to fund the socialist experiment, or are we watching the beginning of a mass exodus?

King County Parks just admitted they can't track where $100 million in taxpayer grants actually went. The funding exploded from $3 million to $20 million—seven times larger—but somehow nobody thought to update their oversight systems. Sound familiar? This is the same playbook we saw with California's $24 billion homeless spending black hole and the Minnesota Somali daycare fraud scandal. When auditors say they can't verify if grants are being used properly, that's government-speak for "we have no idea, but we're hoping for the best." Meanwhile, Seattle's new mayor won't even investigate fraud allegations. Nothing to see here, folks! Is this incompetence or intentional? How many more audits revealing "gaps in oversight" do we need before someone demands real accountability? When the people managing your tax dollars can't tell you where millions went, maybe it's time to stop giving them more. Like and subscribe if you're tired of watching your hard-earned money vanish into bureaucratic black holes while they shrug and say "oops, our bad."

https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/gas.htmlhttps://californiaglobe.com/articles/has-californias-oil-and-gas-industry-hit-the-point-of-no-return/California is about to learn what happens when virtue signaling meets reality. Two major refineries—Phillips 66 and Valero—are shutting down thanks to California's crushing regulations and "sustainability concerns," cutting the state's gasoline production by a staggering 42% and jet fuel by 35%. An assemblyman with 50 years in the oil industry, a USC professor studying refineries since 1973, and a longtime refinery controller are sounding the alarm: California is heading toward fuel shortages, $8-12 per gallon gas, and potential social unrest by summer 2025. Meanwhile, the state will depend on imports from Russia, India, and Singapore shipped on diesel-guzzling tankers—the ultimate climate hypocrisy. Governor Newsom's response? "Nothing to see here." But when summer blend hits, refineries go down for maintenance, and one supply chain hiccup occurs, California won't have the refining capacity to recover. The West Coast's military bases—including Travis Air Force Base—will face jet fuel shortages while importing fuel from the very countries we might defend against. Is anyone surprised California chased out its own energy security? What could possibly go wrong? Hit subscribe and share this before gas lines return.

California is boasting about raking in over $1 billion from its 'mansion tax' on high-end property sales, specifically in areas like Los Angeles. However, critics are questioning where the vast majority of the money is actually going. While the funds were earmarked for homelessness and rental assistance, a mere fraction of the revenue is clearly accounted for in related programs. This lack of transparency is fueling concerns that the money is either stuck in bureaucratic red tape or being diverted to other less visible projects. This situation raises serious questions about California's fiscal responsibility and whether these progressive tax initiatives are truly benefiting those they are intended to help, or simply expanding the state's coffers with little accountability.

San Francisco spent $5 million a year—$20 million total—delivering booze to homeless alcoholics. Yes, you read that right. The city's "Managed Alcohol Program" cost taxpayers $454,000 per client over four years, all in the name of "harm reduction." As usual, progressive policies prioritize keeping people comfortable in their addiction rather than actually helping them recover.We break down how this pandemic-era program lingered for years after COVID ended, why it failed the very people it claimed to help, and how new Mayor Daniel Lurie is finally ditching the harm reduction approach in favor of a Recovery First Act. A formerly homeless recovering addict weighs in on why giving addicts the very substance killing them is lunacy. Meanwhile, cities like Seattle and Portland continue doubling down on the same failed strategies.Is spending nearly half a million per person to keep them drunk really "compassionate"? When did common sense become controversial? Drop your thoughts below, and if you're tired of taxpayer-funded insanity, hit subscribe and share this with someone who needs a reality check.

San Francisco's largest mall just closed its doors—a day early, no less—after nearly 20 years of slow-motion collapse. What started as a 1.5 million square foot retail destination plummeted from $1.2 billion in value to a pathetic $133 million credit sale that nobody even wanted to bid on. We're talking about a mall so bad that human waste in the elevators increased 400%, Panda Express was literally sued to leave, and shoppers chose Amazon over risking the experience. This video covers the entire saga: the foreclosure nobody bid on, Westfield handing back the keys, and Mayor Lurie's uphill battle to figure out what to do with this massive monument to failed progressive policies. The conversion-to-housing dreamers clearly haven't done the math—retrofitting 1.5 million square feet of interior retail space with no windows makes zero economic sense. So what's next for this albatross? A soccer stadium? A permanent reminder of what happens when policy ignores reality? Drop your predictions below and subscribe for updates as this disaster unfolds. Is anyone surprised a mall known for elevator excrement couldn't compete with online shopping?

Alexander Soofer, the director of an L.A. charity, has been arrested for allegedly defrauding the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) of $23 million. Soofer is accused of using the funds, intended to combat homelessness, for personal expenses, including a $7 million house and luxury vehicles. The DOJ is cracking down on this abuse of funds, with officials calling California a "poster child" for waste and fraud. The investigation highlights the lack of oversight in California's homeless programs and the misuse of taxpayer money that should be helping those in need. This latest scandal fuels the debate over LAHSA's effectiveness in solving the growing homeless problem, with accountability coming into sharp focus.

Washington's state auditor just casually mentioned they're "questioning" $415 million in federal daycare program costs because—whoops—they don't actually know where the money went. No adequate documentation. No provider records for four years. But don't worry, the attorney general assures us fraud allegations are "baseless" while simultaneously admitting complaints are flooding in. Here we go again.This video breaks down the mounting evidence of potential massive daycare fraud in Washington state, mirroring the Minnesota Somali daycare scandal that bilked taxpayers for years. We've got 539 daycare centers listing Somali as their primary language with no street addresses, a Democratic lawmaker rushing to conceal provider information, and officials doing the classic "look over here, not there" routine. When the state auditor calls an agency "the most risky of all departments in state government" but says there's no evidence of fraud... is anyone buying that?Why would Washington be immune to the same fraud scheme that worked in Minnesota for over a decade? What's the real number behind that $415 million question mark? Drop your thoughts below and let's follow this money trail together. Hit subscribe and the notification bell—this story is just getting started.

Seattle Democrats promised affordability and delivered the exact opposite—rents skyrocketing to $3,695 for a three-bedroom while housing permits hit their lowest level since 2011. Shocking, right? As usual, progressive policies like rent control caps, millionaire taxes, and a proposed payroll tax are doing what they always do: pushing out landlords, developers, and businesses while constricting housing supply. Meanwhile, the new socialist mayor gets to explain why her affordability platform is colliding with economic reality. We break down how Washington's anti-landlord policies, bureaucratic red tape, and tree-hugging regulations are sending rents to the moon while builders flee to business-friendly states like Oklahoma and Texas. With the World Cup coming and tech workers still moving in, there's only one direction these rents are headed—and it's not down.Think Seattle can regulate its way to affordable housing? How long until three-bedroom rents crack $4,000? Drop your predictions below, and if you're tired of watching progressive policies fail in real time, smash that subscribe button for more reality checks on government incompetence and socialist economics.

Portland passes an urban camping ban with arrests but zero convictions. Shocked? You shouldn't be. Let's break down this masterclass in government theater: 21 people arrested, but thanks to public defender shortages, no-show defendants, and prosecutors who dismiss charges faster than you can say "progressive policies," not a single person has faced consequences. Meanwhile, Washington State is sprinting in the opposite direction—legislators are about to make sweeps virtually impossible statewide, creating such strict shelter requirements that no city will ever meet them. The Supreme Court says sweeping camps isn't cruel and unusual punishment, but Seattle and Olympia apparently know better. So what happens when one state pretends to enforce laws while the other rolls out the welcome mat? Homeless folks aren't stupid—they'll go where the benefits flow and the sweeps don't. Is this compassion or just enabling chaos on taxpayer dime? Are we watching Portland's failed experiment become Washington's official policy? Drop your thoughts below, hit subscribe, and let's call out this insanity together.