Advertise on podcast: VListen

For years, a personal guarantor could file for insolvency and instantly raise a shield — the interim moratorium that freezes creditor action the moment the petition lands. The 2026 IBC amendment quietly took that away. In this episode we unpack what actually changed: why simply filing may no longer buy automatic protection, why the moratorium now hinges on your application being admitted — not just filed — and how that shift is being read to reach cases already in the pipeline. Then the strategic half: why the smart play is to drive hard toward admission instead of parking in pendency, how that opens the door to a real repayment plan with creditors, and why this arguably pulls the process back toward what the Code was built to do — resolve debt, not delay it. If you advise guarantors, lenders, or borrowers under stress, this one rewrites the playbook.

This time it is the supreme court which had to intervene in the case of an order relating to the AI Hallucinated Judgement.

A missed EMI does not make you a criminal. In India, loan default is strictly a civil matter, yet aggressive recovery agents often cross legal boundaries with threats, off-hour calls, and public shaming. In this brief 2-minute episode, we break down: The RBI Fair Practices Code limits on calling hours (8 AM – 7 PM) and contact rules. Exact legal prohibitions against harassment, threats, and privacy violations. A 3-step escalation process: from the lender’s Grievance Redressal Officer to the RBI Integrated Ombudsman (cms.rbi.org.in). When and how to file a criminal complaint or report illegal digital lending apps on Helpline 1930. Know your rights, protect your dignity, and learn how to build an airtight paper trail.

An AI invented three judgments. A State Tax Officer cited them in a GST order. On 20 August 2026, the Gujarat High Court set the whole thing aside.

SC judge strength increases now

The Bombay HC ruled that PGs cannot claim any interim moratorium protection in the pending matters before NCLT as the IBC Amendment of 2026 to Section 96(4) is retroactive.

Imagine a court ruling based on a fake, fabricated and hallucinated precedent generated by artifical intelligence.

In this episode, hosts Prakul Thadi and Bendi Raviteja explore the complex intersection between the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Can enforcement under PMLA continue once insolvency proceedings begin? What happens to ED-attached properties during a resolution process? Are both laws complementary — or conflicting? We break down: • Key Supreme Court & NCLAT rulings • Real-world implications for corporate debt and criminal liability • What law students, CS aspirants, and young professionals should know Brought to you by VirtuaLaw, where we simplify complex legal intersections for students and professionals alike. 🎧 Tune in to gain clarity on a high-stakes legal conflict that shapes India’s corporate and criminal law landscape.

In this episode of VListen, we unpack one of India’s most intricate corporate insolvency battles — the saga of Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL) and JSW Steel. Join host Prakul Thadi as we explore how the Supreme Court of India delivered three landmark judgments in this case: Rejecting the Resolution Plan initially due to implementation delays, Recalling its own order in a rare judicial course correction, and Delivering a decisive verdict upholding the Resolution Plan, reaffirming the primacy of the Committee of Creditors’ commercial wisdom and the core purpose of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). We break down the legal rationale, highlight critical judicial principles, and explain why this saga is a landmark in corporate insolvency jurisprudence. 🎧 Listen to this episode for: Detailed timelines and case facts Judicial reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decisions Lessons for insolvency professionals, lawyers, and corporate stakeholders VListen — your companion for deep insights into insolvency, corporate law, and landmark judgments.

Dive into the groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling on Byju’s insolvency case, which redefines the use of Rule 11 and reaffirms the importance of procedural safeguards under Section 12A of the IBC. This episode unpacks the legal nuances, critiques the NCLAT’s approach, and highlights the limitations of inherent powers of Tribunals when procedural framework is laid out under the law.

In this episode of VListen, host Prasanna delves into the Hon’ble NCLAT’s ruling in Murlidhar Vincom Pvt. Ltd. vs. Skoda (India) Pvt. Ltd. Can unallotted share application money be considered financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016? Join us as we break down the arguments, legal interpretations, and the court’s decision in this landmark case. Perfect for legal professionals, students, and anyone interested in insolvency law!

In this episode, we explore the legal intricacies of whether the Income Tax Department can issue a reassessment notice after a resolution plan has been approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Using the recent case of Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax as our case study, we discuss the Delhi High Court’s judgment and the broader implications for corporate debtors, creditors, and tax authorities. Key highlights: • What happens when tax notices arrive after insolvency resolution? • The role of the resolution plan in closing past claims and liabilities. • Important legal precedents set by the Supreme Court. Tune in to stay informed on the complex overlap between insolvency and tax law. Don’t forget to subscribe to VListen for more insights on corporate governance, insolvency, and finance!

In this episode, Sarthika summarises the amendments made to CIRP Regulations by IBBI.

In this insightful episode of VListen, we unravel the intricacies of directorial liability amidst the protective shield of moratorium provided under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Hon'ble Supreme Court's rulings in pivotal cases shed light on the nuanced legal landscape, challenging the common perception that directors are immune during a company's Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Join us as we delve into key judgments, including the landmark P. Mohanraj vs. Shah Bros. Ispat (P) Ltd., where the Supreme Court clarified the scope of the moratorium and its impact on individual liability. We explore how these legal principles were reiterated in cases like Anjali Rathi and others vs. Today Homes and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others, and most recently, Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association v/s. M/s. Ansal Crown Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The episode also unravels a compelling case where homebuyers sought justice before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), highlighting the practical implications of the Supreme Court's rulings. Tune in to gain a comprehensive understanding of how the Supreme Court navigates directorial liability beyond the IBC moratorium, providing clarity on the legal dynamics within insolvency proceedings. For legal enthusiasts, professionals, and anyone intrigued by the intersection of law and business, this episode is a must-listen. Subscribe now and stay informed on the latest legal insights. Thank you for choosing VListen. If VListen... We Learn!

In this episode, Katyayni touches upon an important aspect of avoidance transactions covering the Supreme Court's take on availing remedies against third parties under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.