Advertise on podcast: Studio Stuff

Studio Stuff Podcast |When Your Ears Fool You: Why Mixing Gets Harder the Longer You Work Ever notice how you can hear everything that's wrong with your mix in the first 30 seconds, but after working on it for a while, those problems seem to disappear? You're not imagining things! And if you've ever listened to a finished mix weeks or months later and wondered how you missed something so obvious, you're definitely not alone. We're back for Season 3, and we're kicking things off with a great listener question about losing perspective while mixing. We're diving into ear fatigue, the mental side of mixing, and the habits that can slowly make us lose objectivity. From listening at lower volumes and taking breaks to using references and changing monitoring systems, we share the techniques that help us hear our mixes with fresh ears again. And as usual, we don't agree on everything! Especially when it comes to how we listen through a song. Plus, we tackle another common home studio question: Should you convert MIDI and virtual instruments to audio before mixing?   Listener Q&A: Ben from Wellington, New Zealand asks: How do you keep your ears from getting too comfortable with the mixes you're working on? Ben finds that he can immediately identify problems when he starts listening, but within seconds, his ears begin adapting. We discuss why this happens and share practical techniques to preserve those valuable first impressions. Gerald asks: Should I render my VST and MIDI tracks to audio before mixing? We explain why we generally prefer working with audio during mixing, including the benefits for CPU performance, session organization, reliability, and long-term project recall. We also talk about when keeping the original MIDI available makes sense.   👉 Got a question for us? Send us your home studio, recording, mixing, or music production questions. We'd love to tackle them in an upcoming episode!

Studio Stuff Podcast | The Mix Sounded Worse Loud… Here’s Why!  Your mix sounds great at a normal listening level. Then you turn it up—and suddenly the reverb feels too loud, the cymbals sound harsh, and the low end starts taking over. So, does that mean the mix is bad? In this episode, we’re breaking down why mixes can sound dramatically different at louder playback levels. We talk about how human hearing changes with volume, how your speakers and room respond differently when pushed harder, and why one bad listening experience at a friend’s house shouldn’t send you back into a full remix. We also explain how to check your mix loud without chasing problems that may not actually exist—and why reference tracks are essential before making any major changes. You’ll Learn: Why your ears hear frequencies differently at different volumes Why bass, treble, reverb, and harshness become more noticeable when listening loud How your speakers, amplifier, and room can change as the volume increases Why one unfamiliar listening environment is only a single data point How to use reference tracks when checking your mix at louder levels Why your mix should become more exciting when turned up—not more painful Topics & Stories: The Fletcher-Munson curves and how they affect what we hear Why a mix can sound balanced quietly but harsh when played loud How to tell whether the problem is your mix, the room, or the playback system Why checking your mix loud is useful—but shouldn’t become your main way of mixing The value of listening quietly, from another room, or while doing something else How references help you understand what “normal” sounds like at high volume Listener Q&A: Shoutout to Stefan Dawson from the Netherlands! Stefan asked why a mix he loved suddenly revealed too much reverb and harshness when played loudly at a friend’s house. We explain why that reaction is completely normal—and how to decide whether the mix actually needs fixing. Final Takeaway: A mix will not sound exactly the same at every volume—and it shouldn’t. The real goal is to create a mix that stays balanced and musical while becoming more exciting as the volume rises. Check it loud, check it quiet, compare it with trusted references, and always make your final decisions in a listening environment you know. 👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Ep 49 - Serve The Song: Cutting Parts Without Crushing Egos Two listener questions, two real studio problems this week. First up, what happens when a mix has too many great ideas competing for the same space, and how do you tell someone their part has to go without bruising their ego? Then we get into toms, arguably the hardest drum element to get right, and walk through our full process for cleaning, tuning, and sampling them until they sit huge in the mix. We're talking arrangement, ego management, and the honest truth about how many "real" tom sounds you hear on records are actually sample-blended. Spoiler: probably all of them. You'll Learn: Why "serving the song" beats serving your own favorite part, every time How to mute and A/B parts so the band hears the decision instead of just being told Our go-to approach for gating and cleaning tom bleed before anything else happens When and why we blend in samples, and why that's not cheating How to keep consistency across tom hits using volume automation instead of relying on inconsistent playing Topics & Stories: The mid-recording camera mishap that kicked off this episode Why removing a part doesn't mean it was a bad idea The "help me help you" mindset for dealing with band egos Firing yourself as a drummer to serve the song The Black Salt Audio Silencer plugin and why it changed the tom game Why reverb, compression, and sampled drums are all just tone shaping, not cheating Listener Q&A: This week's questions came from two YouTube commenters. One asked how to know which parts to cut when a mix feels too dense, and how to deliver that news to a bandmate without the drama. The other asked for help getting toms to sound big and clear when everything else in the mix is dialed in. 👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

The Great Preamp War: Why Both Sides of This Viral Video Drama Are Actually Right So a video dropped last week and the whole audio world lost its mind. You know the one. A long, seriously impressive comparison of cheap interface preamps against a Neve-style preamp, ending with the verdict that they're all basically the same. Cue the passionate response videos and a very loud week online. Here's the thing: we hadn't talked about any of it before we hit record. This episode is us taking both extremes and working through them in real time. We give massive credit where it's due (that comparison video is months of work and incredible storytelling), but we also dig into the part that got everyone fired up, which is testing one clean piece of the chain and then making a call about the whole puzzle. Somewhere in the middle of the car analogies and the tier rankings, we land on what actually moves the needle when you record. You'll Learn: Why a clean preamp comparison doesn't tell you the whole story What pushing a preamp actually does to your sound, and why some pros build their entire mix around it Where the preamp really sits on your recording priority list Why your next upgrade is probably a mic, not a preamp How good mic placement quietly outperforms expensive gear   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Your drums sound massive on their own, then they hit the mix bus and the limiter starts fighting back. In this episode we tackle a great listener question about keeping kick and snare transients under control so they don't trigger your limiter and squash the life out of your mix. We get into the difference between transients and body, why the spike you can't even hear is the one wrecking your loudness, and how to fix the problem at the source instead of patching it in mastering. We also talk drum bus processing, the high pass trick that instantly calms things down, transient shaping as a subtractive tool, and where clipping fits into the chain. Plus, a question about studying other engineers turns into a bigger conversation about stealing concepts rather than copying mixes, why a great album matters more than a famous name, and the new wave of unknown mixers making incredible records on laptops in their bedrooms. You'll Learn: Why transients and body are two different things, and why punch lives in both How an inaudible spike can still trigger your limiter and kill your loudness Why the drum bus is the best place to control peaks before they reach the two bus How high passing your kick instantly calms your mix bus Using transient shaping in reverse to soften spikes without losing impact Where to place clipping and limiting in the chain (and why you want it before mastering) Topics & Stories: The launch of Bus Ride and the most honest plugin testimonial ever recorded Why week five of mixing is apparently a pivotal career moment The "use your ears" gospel according to gear forums Falling in love with albums instead of mix engineers The rise of unknown mixers making world-class records in their bedrooms Listener Q&A: We answer a question about preserving kick and snare transients without overloading the mix bus or mastering limiter, plus a question about whether we study other engineers and who we actually learn from.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #47 | Staying Sharp in the Studio: Sleep, Food, Panning, and Everything In Between It started with Chris being half asleep on a phone call. And somehow that turned into one of our more useful conversations. This episode is about what it actually takes to stay sharp in the studio, and we don't mean productivity hacks or morning routines. We mean the real stuff: sleep, food, hydration, ear fatigue, monitoring habits, and how all of it directly affects the quality of your mix decisions. We break things into categories because there's a real difference between doing some vocal tuning on a tired Saturday morning and making final print decisions on a mix that matters. Knowing where you are in that spectrum changes how you should approach the session, and honestly, whether you should be in the session at all.   Then we get into a question from the MCC live stream about panning. Does moving a sound off-center actually change its tone? We dig into what's really happening physically, what's happening perceptually, and why your DAW's pan law settings matter more than most people realize. You'll Learn: Why sleep is still the most important variable in creative performance How what you eat at lunch affects your afternoon mix session Why monitoring at lower volumes keeps your ears sharper longer What phantom center actually is and why it matters for your panning decisions How pan law settings in your DAW affect the perceived level and tone of a signal Why taking a sound off-center changes how it sits in the mix, even if the raw tone hasn't changed Topics and Stories: Chris zones out mid-conversation about staying sharp. The irony is not lost on anyone. Steve's take on food: carbs during the week are basically a wrap Why the old rock and roll "no sleep, drugs, and cigarettes" era isn't the argument people think it is The magnesium and theanine wind-down routine we're both apparently running Walking. We mean it. Just go for a walk. Phone notifications: off vs. intentional breaks, and why both can work depending on who you are Listener Q&A: Big shoutout to Bullfrog from the MCC live stream for sparking the panning conversation. We talk through why panning a sound changes how it feels in the mix, the role of pan compensation, and why phantom center is one of those concepts that quietly affects everything you do in stereo.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #45 | Your Phone Knows Your Mix Has a Problem. Do You? We get into three listener questions this episode, and at least one of them might change how you check your mixes going forward. The first question comes from Northern California, and it is one we have probably all experienced but never quite pinpointed. A listener notices his mix sounds great in the car and on AirPods, but something about the iPhone speaker makes his reverb sound harsh and brittle. When he tries to fix it, the mix loses something on the other playback systems. We dig into what the phone EQ curve is actually doing, why reverb returns tend to live right in the problem zone, and why other people's mixes don't have the same issue on the same device. The phone is not broken. It is telling you something true. The fixes we talk through: high pass and low pass your reverb return as a first move, add a touch of pre-delay to separate the wet from the dry, and check the whole thing in mono while you are at it. We also make a small promise to ourselves to start checking mixes on our phones more often, which is either a great habit or a rabbit hole. Probably both. The second question is about signal flow. Specifically, what is the advantage of routing your mix to a stereo bus group channel rather than going straight to the output? We walk through how we each handle this in our sessions, why the output channel stays completely clean in both cases, and what happens if you run room correction software like Sonar Works and forget to bypass it before you bounce. Chris also explains why keeping that group bus as a middle man makes it easy to import your mix bus chain from a previous session into a new one, which took a few extra words to explain but is genuinely useful. The third question is a bonus, and it is a good one. Does anyone actually track their time on a mix, and if so, how? Steve uses his feelings. Chris blocks time by the day and lets the song fill the window. We also look at a free plugin called Project Time Pro by Hoffa that logs your session time automatically the moment you open the session. Great concept, one small flaw involving an open Cubase session and a backyard barbecue. You'll Learn: Why the iPhone speaker exposes reverb problems that other playback systems let slide The two-move fix for harsh reverb on phone speakers: high pass and low pass the return, then add pre-delay Why pro mixers EQ their reverb returns way more than most home studio producers realize The case for keeping your output channel completely free of plugins How a stereo bus group channel makes your mix chain portable between sessions Why blocking time might be smarter than tracking it, and what a free session timer actually does to your workflow Topics and Stories: The phone speaker that knows too much Why Chris is finally going to start checking mixes on his iPhone The Sonar Works bypass you absolutely cannot forget before bouncing Steve's feelings-based approach to pricing flat-rate mixes The goldfish and the bowl Project Time Pro and the barbecue problem Listener Q&A: We had three great questions this episode. Keep them coming. Submit yours using the form in the show notes or leave a comment on YouTube and we will get to as many as we can.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #44 | Mic Shootouts, Genre Comfort Zones, and the Music We Love Mixing You've got two mics, one singer, and a session to run. Which one do you reach for? In this episode, we dig into that exact scenario, starting with a great question from Johnny in Denmark. He's got a Rode NT1 and an SE V7, and he wants to know how to think about the choice. We break down the real decision-making process: it's not about which mic is "better" on paper. It's about tone, sibilance, room sensitivity, how much work you'll have to do in the mix, and what the song actually needs. We get into why sibilance is often the first thing that eliminates a mic, why a dynamic sometimes just solves problems a condenser can't, and why committing to two mics at once is a completely valid move when you're still learning what your gear does. We also talk about building an internal catalog of your mics over time, so eventually you walk into a session and already know where to start. Then we shift into Ian's question: what genre do we feel most comfortable mixing and mastering? The answer comes pretty quickly for both of us, and it connects directly to where we each started. You'll Learn: How to run a real mic shootout that actually tells you something useful Why sibilance is a red flag worth eliminating early How room acoustics affect which mic makes sense for a session Why testing across dynamics (verse to chorus) matters as much as tone What it means for a mic to "photoshop" a voice before you even hit record How genre familiarity shapes what you listen for when you mix Topics and Stories: The new breakfast spot (Korean barbecue bowl, and yes, it won) Johnny's mic question: Rode NT1 vs. SE V7 for home studio vocals The SM7B's embarrassing habit of winning shootouts it shouldn't Multi-mic recording as a learning tool Ian's genre question: rock, jazz, country, and why "people music" keeps winning Steve's salsa dancing backstory (and Jessie making him look good) Listener Q&A: Big shoutout to Johnny from Denmark for the mic question, and to Ian for sending in a two-parter. We tackle the first half of Ian's question this episode, what genre we feel most comfortable mixing, and we're saving the second part for an upcoming show. Got a question for us? Drop it in the comments on YouTube or hit the link below to fill out the form.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #43 The Da Vinci Problem: Knowing When to Let Go of Your Mix You've been in the mix for hours. It sounds pretty good. You think it sounds pretty good. But you keep going back in, tweaking, adjusting, making that one last pass. Sound familiar? In this episode, we dig into the question MCC member Frank Robinson sent our way: how do you know when to stop? And is anyone ever actually happy with their final mix? We also get into a comment from our friend KP, who wants to know whether mixing in Cubase versus Pro Tools actually makes a sonic difference. Spoiler: it's mostly about who's driving. You'll Learn: Why the last five percent of a mix can take longer than the first eighty percent What "pushing food around the plate" actually means as a creative signal How the sleep test, the scrolling listen, and the AirPods check each serve a different purpose Why time-constraining your mix sessions might be the most practical habit you can build Whether your DAW choice genuinely affects your sound, and what actually does Topics and Stories: The Da Vinci problem: why art is never finished, only abandoned Chris's graveyard of mixes he refuses to listen to anymore Moving furniture in a prison cell as the perfect metaphor for overmixing Steve's logic-to-Pro Tools workflow and why he uses two different tools for two different jobs The rich guy with thirty cars: which one do you take to church, the track, and the road trip? Why Chris drives a Volvo and Steve has a Ferrari, a Bugatti, and several Hondas Listener Q&A: Big shoutout to Frank Robinson from the MCC! His question: how do you decide when to stop tinkering and call the mix done? And is anyone really fully happy with their final mix? We spend a good chunk of the episode on this one because it deserves it. We also dig into a comment from KP, who floated the idea of a Cubase vs. Pro Tools mix-off. We address the DAW question seriously, and then immediately give KP a hard time about the competition idea.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #42 | Mixing, Mastering, and the Mindset That Separates Them You finish the mix, you're happy with it, you slap Ozone on the master bus... and now what? Do you keep tweaking? Do you bounce and walk away? Do you send it somewhere? One listener question about Tonal Balance Control opened up a conversation we've been circling around for a while, and this episode is where we finally went there. We're talking about the mixing vs. mastering mindset, whether tools like Ozone belong on the mix bus, how AI mastering services fit into a real workflow, and why your answer to all of this probably depends more on your personality than your plugins. You'll Learn: Why Tonal Balance Control works great as a monitoring tool, not a mix bus effect What separates a "mix-mastering" workflow from a proper two-stage process When it makes sense to leave Ozone committed and keep tweaking the mix around it Why Chris and Steve approach this completely differently, and why both approaches hold up What AI mastering tools are actually good for, and where they fall short Why mastering your own music is one of the best kept secrets for getting better at mixing Topics and Stories: Edward Stashko's listener question about Tonal Balance and Ozone on the mix bus The Cubase control room advantage and why Steve is smug about it Chris's recent shift toward mix-mastering and why he's owning it Sending mixes out: Nashville, Montreal, Winnipeg, and Sterling Sound in New York What happened when three mastering engineers got the same single Steve officially becoming a grandpa in the Denny's parking lot Listener Q&A: Big shoutout to Edward Stashko for this week's question. He asked whether running a mix through Tonal Balance Control before using Ozone as an automated mastering tool produces a better result, and whether tweaking after the mastering stage creates problems that could have been caught earlier. Edward, you cracked this one wide open. Great question.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #41 | NS10 Translation in 2026: Emotion, Mixing, and What Actually Works What does emotion in music actually mean? And does your mix have to make someone cry to count as art? We got a comment on our Angine de Poitrine episode that sent us down a rabbit hole, and we're not mad about it. In this episode, we're responding to a listener comment that challenged whether technical genius can actually be a form of emotional expression. Then we pivot into something every home studio mixer has wondered about: is the old NS10 translation theory still valid in 2026? Two very different conversations. One throughline: what does it mean for something to actually work? You'll Learn: Why awe and admiration are legitimate emotional responses to music How the NS10 theory made perfect sense in its era and why it needs more context today What mix translation actually means with AirPods, Bluetooth speakers, and modern monitoring in the picture Why "sounds good on bad speakers, sounds good anywhere" now comes with a few asterisks Topics and Stories: The Dirk Campbell comment calling Angine de Poitrine's playing "musical parkour" and why we pushed back Why cathedrals, the Olympics, and a guy spilling wine while distracted by a YouTube clip all ended up in the same conversation Chris's confession about borrowed NS10s appearing in his old YouTube videos Why the speakers in your car and living room all basically sounded the same thirty years ago, and how that changed everything Listener Q&A: Shoutout to Mastermind on YouTube for the NS10 question. We get into the full translation theory, why it made sense in its day, and how monitoring has evolved enough that it's now more of a checkpoint than a rule.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #40 | The Omelet Crisis and How Many Reverbs You Actually Need Alright, the steak omelets are gone and the vibes are… fragile. But despite the breakfast tragedy, we’re digging into a topic that separates the bedroom demos from the pro records: Reverb. Specifically, are you using it to make things "wet," or are you using it to create a 3D space? In this episode, we answer Cornelius’s question about how many reverbs are too many. We talk about why we’ve moved away from the "one size fits all" reverb buss and how we use EQ and compression on the reverb itself to keep things clean. Plus, we address a listener who thinks Steve is crazy for needing to "acclimate" to his mixing headphones. (Spoiler: Steve might be crazy, but he's right about the headphones). You’ll Learn: Why reverb is actually a dimension tool, not just an effect The "Feel vs. Hear" rule for modern vocal processing How to EQ your reverb returns to stop them from eating your mix Why "Critical Listening" requires a different brain state than the gym or the car The reason professional reference headphones feel like "learning a new language" Topics & Stories: The tragic loss of the Denny’s steak omelet (and Chris’s resulting mood) Steve’s philosophy on "sub-spaces" for snares vs. toms Why high-passing your reverb is the fastest way to a pro sound The difference between AirPods and reference-grade monitors Why Steve thinks you need to "re-learn" your ears every time you switch gear Listener Q&A: A massive shoutout to Cornelius for the reverb deep dive and to Rome 81 for calling Steve out on his headphone habits! We break down the technical difference between "casual listening" and "data-driven mixing."   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #39 | The Band That Broke the Internet (And What It Means for You) We lost the Denny's steak omelet. But we found hope for music. There's a band from Quebec called Angine de Poitrine, that stopped us mid-conversation and made us ask a question we hadn't thought to ask in a while: what does it actually sound like when human creativity has no ceiling? That's where this episode starts. And honestly, it's one of the more hopeful conversations we've had on this show." You'll Learn: Why micro-tonal, math rock music is so disorienting at first listen, and why that's exactly the point What makes this Quebec duo different from just "weird for weird's sake" How real, raw talent is the most durable weapon against AI-generated music Why the next generational band might already be building an audience right now How Steve trained his ears to trust the low end on reference headphones after years on speakers The EQ-boost technique that bridges the gap while your brain catches up Topics and Stories: The band from deep Quebec with more frets than you've ever seen on a guitar Why loop stations, quarter tones, and impossible time signatures somehow groove What Genesis, Rush, and 2112 have to do with a sold-out show in San Francisco Chris's daughter Kayla and son-in-law now casually listening to micro-tonal math rock in the car How Denny's became the emotional villain of this episode Listener Q&A: Huge shoutout to Ryan, who asked a great question about mixing on headphones after years of doing live sound. When you're used to feeling the PA in your chest, reference headphones can feel like mixing in a vacuum. Steve breaks down exactly how he made that mental shift, including the boosted EQ phase, why he gradually pulled it back, and the moment he realized he actually trusted his ears again.   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #38 | Mixing With Your Eyes: Visual Tools, Meters, and the Mix Bus Limiter Debate Can you actually mix with your eyes? Should you? We're diving into one of those conversations that sounds like it has an obvious answer, until you really start pulling it apart. This week, we're talking about the visual tools we actually use in our mixes: spectrum analyzers, tonal balance plugins, phase correlation meters, LUFS readouts, and more. We get into when they help, when they hurt, and how to keep them in their lane so they're working for you instead of turning your mix into a connect-the-dots exercise. We also celebrate a big milestone, one year on YouTube. If you've been watching and listening, this one's partly for you. You'll Learn: Why tonal balance tools like iZotope's Tonal Balance Control are about finding the ballpark — not the bullseye How freezing Pro-Q's spectrum display changed the way Chris hears his mixes Why the low end is where visual metering earns its keep (especially in untreated rooms) When to close the analyzer and just trust your ears and your instincts How phase correlation meters caught a real problem on a live MCC stream Why gain staging with your speakers off is not only okay, it's smart Topics & Stories: Steve's algorithm keeps serving him Chris's face, even at home, in his off time AJ calls in mid-recording via the "ring even on silent" feature, it works, everybody We talk about our favourite spectrum analyzer plugins (Tonal Balance Control, Ozone overlay, the Pro-Q freeze trick) Chris's journey through three different rooms and why metering became a survival skill We accidentally prove we've now been doing this long enough to repeat ourselves (we already did an episode on mixing full albums, we forgot) How ear fatigue makes your meters more trustworthy than your ears after hour two Listener Q&A: Big shoutout to Stefan Jorissen for this week's question: "Do you put a limiter on your two bus from the beginning of the mix? What are the settings, and do you adjust them during the mix or adjust the tracks to keep within the desired range?" We break down the different schools of thought, mixing into a limiter, using one as a bypass reference check, and why Chris eventually stopped mixing with one running the whole time (hint: his mastering engineer's limiter sounded a lot better than his).   👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.

Studio Stuff Podcast #37 | Third-Party Plugins vs Tim Tams: Which Actually Improves Your Mix? Do you really need third-party plugins to make a professional mix… or are stock plugins already doing more than enough? In this episode, we dig into one of the biggest mindset traps in modern mixing: believing the next plugin will magically improve your sound. We talk about where third-party plugins can genuinely help, where stock plugins are often underrated, and why better tools do not automatically mean better mixes. Along the way, we get into workflow, inspiration, tone, specialty processing, CPU efficiency, and how to think more clearly about what you actually need in your setup. And yes… Tim Tams make an unexpected appearance too. What We Dig Into: Why stock plugins are often more capable than people think Why buying more plugins does not automatically make you a better mixer How third-party plugins can help with workflow, speed, tone, and inspiration The difference between a plugin that is useful and one that is just tempting Why specialized tools can sometimes solve problems faster than stock options How learning your stock plugins first can make you a stronger mixer Why some plugins become part of a mixer’s signature sound Topics & Stories: Chris introduces Steve to the Tim Tam coffee trick The plugin rabbit hole and why so many mixers fall into it Why great mixers still sound like themselves, even with unfamiliar tools The real value of analog-style channel strips and plugin color Why stock plugins often have an advantage when it comes to CPU efficiency The difference between tools that improve workflow and tools that create distraction Listener Q&A: Shoutout to Oh Sushi Studio for the question: What non-musical item is essential for a proper recording studio in 2026? Chris and Steve share their picks, including a mug warmer, comfortable studio clothes, and the little everyday things that make a studio feel like a place you actually want to spend time in. 👉 Got a question for us?📩 Submit it here: Form LinkWe pull topics directly from your questions and YouTube comments. And if you’re digging the show, hit follow/subscribe and leave a quick review.It really helps more home studio folks find Studio Stuff.