Advertise on podcast: Lock'd Up with Copville

In this episode of Lock’d Up with Copville, I break down the Cornell sexual assault allegations, the timeline and serious questions about how the case was handled. Then we tackle the tit-for-tat comparisons with the Lindsay Clancy case: victim advocacy, outrage and whether people apply the same standards when their emotions change.

This week we taslk defemation and two pretty wild police videos resulting in deaths.

The badge won’t save you. Your follower count won’t save you. And dancing around on TikTok won’t prepare you for someone fighting to take your life. This is a serious profession with deadly consequences. You need the fitness to keep fighting, the skills to protect yourself and others, and the mental discipline to make sound decisions under extreme pressure. Being prepared to fight also means knowing when to use force—and when to stop. In this episode of Lock’d Up with Copville, I break down two intense bodycam encounters: a confrontation involving a person reportedly experiencing a mental health crisis that ends in an in-custody death and raises serious questions about repeated Taser use, and a wanted shooting suspect whose foot pursuit ends in a fatal officer-involved shooting. We’re taking a hard look at the tactics, the force, and the consequences. Was the Taser use excessive? What happens when your equipment doesn’t end the fight? Can you maintain control, think clearly, and recognize when the situation changes? If you’re thinking about applying, understand what you’re signing up for. You may have to fight for your life, protect someone else’s, or make a decision you’ll carry forever. Taking this job seriously means preparing before that moment arrives. Get in shape. Train your hands. Be proficient with your weapons. Build your mental discipline. Your partners and the public need someone they can count on when everything goes sideways.

A little update on the UFC progress of Miami-Dade Deputy Luis Hernandez winning two UFC fights in 11 days.

What happens when off-duty police officers show up to a high school football game in plain clothes, armed, and using a marked police vehicle?In this episode of Lock'd Up with Copville, we break down the questions surrounding a recent incident involving Vero Beach Police officers at a local football game.According to reporting by Vero News, deputies became concerned after observing what appeared to be a civilian accessing a marked police vehicle. That person turned out to be an off-duty police officer. The situation raises bigger questions about take-home vehicle policies, communication between agencies, off-duty firearm rules, supervision, and officer safety.We also examine reports that one of the officers had previously been involved in an issue concerning carrying a firearm at a football game. If expectations had already been communicated, why did another situation occur?And there’s another question worth asking: Why was a marked police vehicle being used to attend the game in the first place? Was it simply a misunderstanding of the take-home vehicle policy, or did having the police vehicle provide parking, admission, access, or some other benefit? There is currently no evidence establishing that the officers were attempting to get into the game for free, but it is a question that deserves clarification.Most importantly, this incident shows how seemingly small policy issues can create much larger problems. Deputies believed they might be dealing with an unauthorized person accessing a police vehicle. Add plain clothes and firearms to that situation, and a misunderstanding could potentially become a serious officer-safety issue.We break down what is known, what remains unanswered, and why clear policies and consistent accountability matter.This episode is about asking questions—not assuming guilt. The facts and the policies should provide the answers.

🔥 HOT TOPIC WITH COPVILLE & JOJO — POLICE USE OF FORCE Tonight on Hot Topic with Copville & Jojo, we’re breaking down several controversial police videos that are generating serious discussion about use of force, accountability, and officer decision-making. First, we’ll examine video showing an officer kicking a suspect in the head. The officer claims the kick was accidental—but what does the video actually show, and what factors should be considered before reaching a conclusion? We’ll also cover several other incidents, including the case of an NYPD officer jailed in connection with the use of a chokehold. We’re putting the videos on the screen, examining the circumstances, and letting YOU weigh in. 🚨 Use of Force • Bodycam Breakdown • Police Accountability • Live Discussion 🎙️ Hot Topic with Copville & Jojo📺 LIVE tonight at 7 PM on CopvilleOG YouTube & Facebook Watch the videos. Hear the discussion. Then tell us what YOU think.

🚨 EMERGENCY BROADCAST: VIRAL VERO BEACH POLICE VIDEO A video involving a First Amendment auditor and the Vero Beach Police Department is going viral on Facebook—and there’s a lot being said about what happened. In this Copville Emergency Broadcast, we’re breaking down the encounter from a law-enforcement perspective. What did the auditor have a legal right to do? How did the officers respond? Could the situation have been handled differently? And what can officers learn from encounters where someone is intentionally recording and testing the boundaries of the First Amendment? We’re going to separate what the video actually shows from the social-media commentary, talk about officer discretion and constitutional rights, and discuss how one encounter can quickly become a public-relations issue when millions of people have a camera in their pocket. 🚨 Viral video. First Amendment rights. Police response. Public accountability. This is Copville. Let’s break it down.

Law enforcement officers are trusted with access to some of the most sensitive information available—driver’s license photos, home addresses, vehicle information, criminal-justice records, and license-plate-reader data. That access is a privilege, not a personal search engine.In this episode of Copville, we break down the case of former Florida Highway Patrol Trooper Alain Fernandez, who is accused of using restricted law-enforcement databases for personal purposes and sharing confidential information with friends and associates through text messages and Snapchat.Investigators allege the conduct wasn't an isolated mistake. Reporting on the FDLE investigation describes at least 22 alleged disclosures between 2022 and 2025, involving information associated with systems including DAVID, NCIC, and Flock license-plate-reader data.We’re digging into the questions every cop and every citizen should be asking: What happens when someone with a badge turns government databases into a tool for their friends? Where is the line between having access and having authorization? How are these searches audited? And what should happen when that trust is allegedly abused?We’ll also break down the rules governing DAVID, Flock, and NCIC, because “I had access” is not the same thing as “I had a legitimate law-enforcement reason to use it.”The badge gives you responsibility. The password gives you access. Neither gives you permission to use sensitive information however you want.This case involves allegations and criminal charges. Fernandez is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

In this episode of Lock’d Up with Copville, we examine body-camera footage showing a Fort Myers police officer being placed in a difficult position after stopping a city employee for allegedly speeding 12 mph over the limit in a school zone. After the driver contacted Police Chief Jason Fields, the officer was asked to extend a “professional courtesy” and void the approximately $300 ticket. This episode goes beyond the ticket itself. We discuss what happens when police leaders pressure officers to take actions that may conflict with policy, professional judgment, or equal enforcement of the law. Officers placed in these situations may be forced to choose between following their conscience and following the direction of someone who controls their assignments, evaluations, promotions, and careers. That pressure can cause anxiety, stress, loss of confidence, moral injury, and fear of retaliation. It can also place an officer’s credibility and reputation at risk—even when the decision originated with someone higher in the chain of command. We examine how these leadership decisions can affect officer mental health, careers, agency morale, and public trust. If an ordinary citizen would have received the ticket, should a government employee be treated differently simply because she could call the chief? Accountability must apply at every level of law enforcement especially at the top. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Lock'd Up Wwith Copville, we take a deeper look at the continued allegations of misuse involving FLOCK license plate reader systems—and an important question that goes far beyond simply violating a user agreement. When an officer runs a license plate without a legitimate law-enforcement purpose, is that merely an agency policy violation? Or could certain conduct potentially cross the line into a criminal offense? We break down **Florida Statute § 815.06**, Florida’s computer-crimes law. The statute addresses a person who willfully and knowingly accesses a computer, computer system, computer network, or electronic device **without authorization or in a manner that exceeds authorization**, while knowing the access is unauthorized or exceeds that authorization. A violation of § 815.06(2) is generally a **third-degree felony**, subject to the statute’s exceptions and enhanced penalties. We’ll also discuss FLOCK user agreements, agency policies and the responsibilities that come with having access to powerful investigative databases. But there’s another issue: consistency and accountability. If an agency considers unauthorized database access serious misconduct for one employee, how should similar allegations involving another employee be handled? Should rank, assignment, relationships or popularity affect how allegations are investigated or disciplined? This episode isn’t about declaring anyone guilty. It’s about examining the facts, understanding the rules and asking whether those rules are being **investigated and enforced consistently across the board**. Technology like FLOCK can be an incredibly powerful law-enforcement tool. But with that power comes responsibility—and when officers are given access to information the general public cannot access, accountability matters. FLOCK. User agreements. Florida computer-crime law. Internal investigations. And the question at the center of it all: Are the same rules being applied to everyone? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lock’d Up with Copville — Warrior Choice Foundation In this episode of Lock’d Up with Copville, I sit down with Anthony Longo of the Warrior Choice Foundation and law-enforcement veteran Jerry Wurms, the first officer ever featured on the hit television show COPS. Anthony takes us inside the mission of the Warrior Choice Foundation, which provides specially trained service dogs to veterans and K9s to law-enforcement agencies. He explains the intense training these dogs go through before they're ready to serve and the incredible amount of time, effort, commitment, and dedication required from a potential candidate before being paired with one of their service dogs. This isn't simply about handing someone a dog. Anthony explains the process behind creating a successful team and why both the dog and the person receiving it have to put in the work to build a relationship that can truly make a difference. Jerry joins the conversation to talk about why he believes so strongly in Warrior Choice Foundation, the incredible work he's seen them do, and why he's now helping support the organization and spread the word about its mission. We also discuss several upcoming fundraising events that will help Warrior Choice Foundation continue its mission. Please check them out, attend an event if you can, and learn more about how you can support the organization. Learn more, see upcoming events, and support Warrior Choice Foundation:Warrior Choice Foundation — warriorschoice.org We talk veterans, law enforcement, service dogs, working K9s, training, commitment, and the incredible bond between these animals and the people they serve. This episode gives you a look at just how much work goes on behind the scenes to put the right dog with the right person—and the people dedicating themselves to making it happen. Like, subscribe, share, and please support the Warrior Choice Foundation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Copville, I sit down with Chief Jeremy Story of the Las Cruces Police Department in New Mexico. This episode was dedicated to Los Cruces Officer Jonah Hernandez #989 who was killed in the line of duty February 11, 2024. Chief Story is a United States Marine, Global War on Terrorism veteran and Grand Master level competitive shooter. He brings a disciplined, performance-driven approach to law-enforcement leadership, with a strong focus on fitness, firearms, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and staying sharp through continuous training. He also passed the Copville test by using social media to share real police content, highlight his officers, and showing off physical fitness rather than dancing around for views. We talk about his military and law-enforcement career, his leadership style, officer preparedness and why police leaders should hold themselves to the same standards they expect from their officers. It’s a good conversation about leadership, accountability and building officers who are ready to handle the job when it counts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

IT’S ALWAYS WALMART In this episode of Copville, we break down body-camera footage from the June 16, 2026, shooting inside a Walmart loss-prevention office in Anchorage, Alaska. Three officers responded to what began as a reported shoplifting call. As they attempted to take the suspect into custody, a struggle followed and the suspect allegedly fired a concealed handgun. One officer was struck twice in the lower body, while another was struck in the chest—but was protected by his ballistic plate. Officer Kaden Pohl returned fire, killing the suspect. This incident is a powerful reminder that there is no such thing as a “minor” or routine call. We examine complacency, positioning, control, communication, and the tactical warning signs officers cannot afford to overlook. We also discuss the importance of wearing your ballistic vest/body armor on every call. Nobody starts a shift knowing which shoplifting complaint, traffic stop, disturbance, or seemingly routine encounter will suddenly become deadly. In this incident, body armor made a critical difference when an officer was struck in the chest. This isn’t Monday-morning quarterbacking. It’s about learning from real encounters, so officers are better prepared for the next one. Stay alert. Stay prepared. Wear your vest. Never underestimate the call. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Florida just slammed the brakes on the FLOCK surveillance machine—and local agencies should be preparing for the fallout. The Florida Department of Transportation has revoked approvals for automated license-plate readers located within State Highway System rights-of-way. Local police departments and sheriffs have 30 days to remove the affected cameras. If they fail to act, FDOT says it will remove the remaining devices. FDOT has also stopped approving future LPR placement requests within its jurisdiction. Read the reported details (https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/regional/florida/flock-camera-removal-order-florida-fdot/67-550bc3af-6af9-4166-9a63-547c06734968). Governor Ron DeSantis has come down hard on the unchecked expansion of this technology, saying its use had gotten “out of control” and warning that Florida cannot be allowed to become a surveillance state. See his reported comments (https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/florida-governor-says-public-is-right-to-be-concerned-about-flock-cameras-0fd0efdd). Now comes the accountability. Sheriffs and police chiefs must determine which cameras are affected, remove them, address contracts and taxpayer money already committed, and explain how losing coverage along state highways will affect their operations. They should also be prepared to answer tougher questions about search practices, access controls, audits, data sharing, alleged misuse and whether elected officials truly knew how these systems were being operated. Some agencies may attempt to relocate cameras onto local, county or private property. Others may abandon their programs entirely. Either way, the days of quietly building a massive vehicle-tracking network without meaningful public scrutiny appear to be ending. Let’s be accurate: this memo does not automatically ban every FLOCK camera everywhere in Florida. It specifically addresses LPR systems located within FDOT-controlled State Highway System rights-of-way. But the message from Tallahassee is unmistakable: unchecked surveillance, questionable searches and “trust us” accountability are no longer enough. On this episode of Copville, we break down what the FDOT action actually says, what Ron DeSantis is signaling, what local sheriffs could lose and why every agency using FLOCK should expect the public to start demanding receipts. The FLOCK has been noticed. Now the people operating it have some explaining to do. #Copville #FLOCK #FlockSafety #RonDeSantis #FDOT #Florida #Privacy #Surveillance #LawEnforcement #PoliceAccountability #Sheriff #ConstitutionalRights Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode of Lock’d Up With Copville, 23-year law enforcement veteran Michael Dilks takes a detailed look at the Lindsay Clancy case, separating what the evidence and trial testimony actually show from claims and misinformation spreading across social media. Rather than relying on viral clips, headlines, or online speculation, Michael breaks down the case through the lens of decades of investigative experience. We examine the timeline of January 24, 2023, Patrick Clancy’s movements and phone activity, Lindsay’s digital activity, Apple Health data, toxicology evidence, statements attributed to Lindsay, and the medical-examiners testimony. We’ll also identify several widely repeated claims about the case that may not match the evidence presented in court, explaining what the record actually establishes, what remains disputed, and what simply cannot be concluded from the available evidence. Most importantly, this episode remembers the three children at the center of this tragedy: Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy. Evidence over speculation. Facts over viral narratives. Hosted by Michael Dilks — 23-Year Law Enforcement Veteran Disclaimer: This program contains commentary and analysis of an ongoing criminal proceeding. Lindsay Clancy is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Opinions expressed are based on publicly available evidence and testimony. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices