Advertise on podcast: Rapture on SermonAudio

The sermon explores the theological distinction between the Church and the nation of Israel, emphasizing that the New Covenant is specifically for Israel while Gentiles have been grafted into God's plan through the mystery of grace. It clarifies that the Church is not the replacement for Israel but a separate entity created by God's foreknowledge, citing Ephesians and Colossians to demonstrate the unfathomable riches of this inclusion. The teaching distinguishes between the 'fullness of the Gentiles,' which precedes the Rapture, and the 'times of the Gentiles,' a period of Gentile dominion over Jerusalem that will end with Christ's return. By analyzing Luke 21 and Romans 11, the message warns against spiritual ignorance and self-righteousness, urging believers to understand that God's promises to Israel remain irrevocable despite their partial blindness. The tone is instructional and corrective, aiming to align the congregation's understanding with a literal interpretation of Scripture regarding end-times events and divine election.

Why ought we believe in a pretribulation rapture? I can think of at least one good reason: immanency.

The blessed hope is the growth of the Kingdom so that the knowledge of God covers the earth as the waters cover the sea. That is the message Peter proclaimed at Pentecost.

Anticipating the Rapture: Knowing Truth, Encouraging Others, Living Holy. We are joined by Carl Broggi (Pastor). Topics discussed include: The Rapture: The Reality, Purpose, and Response. Living a Life Reflective of the Rapture.

As in the account of Lazarus, we also who are believers in the Lord Jesus Christ shall rise again at the rapture to be with Him forever.

This sermon examines the major theological positions regarding the Tribulation, contrasting preterist, historicist, and idealist views with the futurist perspective. It argues that a literal, historical-grammatical interpretation of Scripture necessitates a distinction between Israel and the Church, leading to a future, seven-year period of divine wrath. The speaker presents a detailed case for a pre-tribulation rapture, citing 1 Thessalonians 4 and 5 to demonstrate that the Church is not destined for God's wrath and will be removed before the outpouring of judgment. The discussion concludes by affirming the distinct prophetic role of Israel in God's redemptive plan, emphasizing that the Church and Israel are separate entities with intertwined but distinct destinies.

This sermon examines the theological distinctions between the Rapture and the Day of the Lord, arguing for a pre-tribulational timeline where believers are removed before the period of divine wrath begins. The speaker identifies 1 Thessalonians 5 and 2 Thessalonians 2 as the primary biblical texts defining the start of the Day of the Lord, linking the 'peace and safety' mentioned in the former to the initial seal of Revelation and the rise of the Antichrist. By contrasting the pre-tribulational view with post-tribulational, mid-tribulational, and pre-wrath perspectives, the presentation addresses common apologetic challenges, such as the accusation that pre-tribulationalism is an 'escape' mentality. The discussion emphasizes that the church is exempt from God's wrath, not merely hell, and clarifies that the Rapture is imminent and distinct from the specific events of the tribulation period.

The sermon explores the theological relationship between Israel and the Church through the olive tree metaphor in Romans 11, emphasizing that Gentiles are grafted into the Abrahamic covenant by grace rather than boasting against the natural branches. By cross-referencing Ephesians 2, the message highlights the transition from being dead in trespasses and strangers to the commonwealth of Israel to becoming fellow citizens of God through the blood of Christ. The central theme warns against spiritual pride, reminding believers that their standing is maintained solely by faith and the nourishment of the root, not by their own works. The discourse concludes with the assurance that God's covenants with Israel are irrevocable, promising that the natural branches will be restored when the fullness of the Gentiles comes in, ultimately pointing to the future kingdom and the fulfillment of the New Covenant.

(AI Generated Summary) This sermon examines Luke 21:27 as the climactic point of the Olivet Discourse, arguing that the return of the Son of Man is a visible, cosmic event rather than a secret or invisible occurrence. The text contrasts the humble, hidden nature of Christ's first coming, which accomplished redemption through substitutionary death, with the resplendent glory and power of His second coming, which will be witnessed by all nations. By refuting interpretations that suggest a secret rapture or an invisible 70 AD fulfillment, the message emphasizes that the Day of the Lord will be marked by supernatural signs and universal recognition. The sermon concludes with a pastoral exhortation to believers to stand firm in faith and persevere in their earthly pilgrimage, anchored by the blessed hope of Christ's visible return and the transformation of their bodies.

This sermon explores the theological comfort found in 1 Thessalonians 4, addressing the anxiety of early believers who feared that deceased Christians would miss the imminent return of Christ. The speaker clarifies that the phrase "fallen asleep" is a euphemism for death, not a doctrine of soul sleep, and emphasizes that the resurrection of Jesus guarantees the future bodily resurrection of all believers. By examining the tension between Christ bringing the dead with Him and raising them from the dead, the message highlights the mystery of the intermediate state and the transformation of the body into an imperishable form. The tone is pastoral and instructional, aiming to dispel fear and encourage the congregation with the certainty that death is not the end for those in Christ. Ultimately, the sermon affirms that believers will always be with the Lord, providing a profound hope that transcends the grief associated with loss.

We continue our examination of the different views of the rapture.