Advertise on podcast: LSAT Logical Reasoning: The Argument-Type Playbook

LSAT prep is changing fast as remote testing disappears for most takers and Prometric centers become the new normal. The hosts break down how to train for sensory overload, adapt to the new LawHub interface, and avoid the hidden time costs of extra clicks. Show Notes Upcoming Changes to the LSAT Process: https://lawhub.org/prepare-for-the-lsat/about-the-lsat/upcoming-changes-lsat-process-aug-2026 Update on the New LSAT User Interface for the 2026-2027 ...: https://www.lsac.org/blog/update-new-lsat-user-interface-2026-2027-testing-cycle

Learn why the new triple-digit LSAT prep tests can hide years of older explanations, and how LSAC’s conversion tables help you find the original sources. The episode also breaks down the 66% chance of an experimental Logical Reasoning section and why you need stamina training to handle three LR sections without burning out.

With Logic Games retired, this episode breaks down why Reading Comp has become the new score separator, from the “nouns versus verbs” approach to pacing and blind review tactics. It also covers the redesigned argumentative writing task, remote proctoring rules, and why the unscored sample may soon matter for admissions.

This episode breaks down a full Logical Reasoning game plan: how to use pacing, the skip rule, and two-pass section strategy to avoid burning time on one hard question. It also explains how question types map to the same argument structure, then shows how blind review can turn missed questions into points.

Learn how test writers plant answers that sound decisive but miss the logic of the argument. This episode breaks down a five-part trap checklist, plus prephrasing and pacing tactics you can use to eliminate wrong choices fast.

This episode breaks down three rare LSAT question types: paradox, evaluate, and cannot be true. Learn how to spot each stem fast, avoid common traps, and use the right strategy to make conflicting facts fit or identify the key missing link.

This episode shifts from attacking flaws to describing arguments accurately, breaking down the three main structure question types: Method of Reasoning, Role of a Statement, and Point at Issue. Learn how to spot the move, label a sentence’s job, and identify where two speakers disagree without getting distracted by hidden flaws.

Learn how to strip away topic traps and identify the logical skeleton underneath arguments, with a focus on principle questions, parallel reasoning, and parallel flaw. The episode also drills conditional logic, necessary vs. sufficient conditions, and how to match arguments by structure instead of subject matter.

This episode breaks down inference questions in logical reasoning, showing how to separate Must Be True from Most Strongly Supported. It also teaches a fast overreach test for spotting answers that go one step too far, especially when quantifiers like some, most, and all are in play.

Learn how to spot when an LSAT argument jumps from correlation to causation, and why that leap hides a key assumption. This episode breaks down the three classic attacks on causal claims: alternative causes, reverse causation, and coincidence.

Learn a fast method for tackling Flaw questions by identifying the gap between premises and conclusion, prephrasing the error, and testing each answer choice against the argument itself. The episode also breaks down the biggest trap in LSAT reasoning: answers that sound right in the abstract but fail because they describe a flaw the author never actually made.

Learn the one-skill framework behind Strengthen and Weaken questions by focusing on the argument gap, not the stated facts. This episode breaks down why tempting choices that attack the premises are wrong, and shows three reliable ways to weaken an argument without falling for LSAT traps.

Learn how to spot whether an LSAT assumption stem asks for something required to survive or enough to guarantee the conclusion. The episode breaks down the Negation Test for necessary assumptions, common negation mistakes, and how to build a sufficient assumption that closes the gap.

Learn how to spot sufficient vs. necessary conditions, decode trigger words like if and only if, and avoid the classic LSAT trap of reading an arrow backward. The episode also breaks down the contrapositive and the two common mistakes that make conditional reasoning go wrong.

Learn how the modern LSAT is structured now that Logic Games is gone, and why Logical Reasoning carries so much weight on the test. This episode breaks down the core argument pattern—conclusion, premises, and assumption—and shows how to spot the conclusion using the Why Test and key signal words.