Advertise on podcast: Din Felsefesi

Merhaba, aşağıdaki kaynakça lisans tezimden. Okuma olarak değerlendirebilirsiniz. Tw: ⁠arif_adalar⁠  Ig: ⁠arif.adalar⁠  [email protected] Akdemir, Ferhat. “Alvin Plantinga’nın Din Felsefesi.” PhD thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 2006.  Boucher, Sandy C. “Methodological Naturalism in the Sciences.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 88, (2019): 57-80.  Draper, Paul. “God and Evil: A Philosophical Inquiry.” Paper presented at the 9th Annual Plantinga Fellow Lecture. University of Notre Dame, 2010.  Draper, Paul. God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence. Internet Infidels (Online Publisher). 2008. Accessed May 19, 2021. https://infidels.org/library/mod-ern/debates/great-debate.html.  Draper, Paul. “Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists.” Noûs 23, no. 3 (1989): 331-350.  Dubray, Charles. "Naturalism." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911. Erdem, Engin. “Kötülük Problemi.” In Din Felsefesi. Edited by Recep Kılıç, 301-337. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Uzaktan Eğitim Yayınları, 2013.  Forrest, Barbara. “Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection.” Philo 3, no. 2 (2000): 7-29.  Friedman, Michael. "Philosophical Naturalism." Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71, no. 2, (1997): 5-21.  Harvey, Carolyn M. “Lactantius’ De Ira Dei: An Explication of the Arguments and Study of Lactantius’ Treatment of Greco-Roman Philosophy.” MA Thesis, University of Georgia, 2003.  Hickson, Michael. “A Brief History of Problems of Evil.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil. Edited by Justin McBrayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder, 3-19. Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.  Howard-Snyder, Danile. “The Logical Problem of Evil: Mackie and Plantinga.” In The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil. Edited by Justin McBrayer and Daniel Howard-Snyder, 19-34. Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.  Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. (Online publisher) Global Grey Ebooks. 2018. Hume, David. The Natural History of Religion. With an introduction by John M. Robert-son, 54. (London: A. and H. Bradlaugh Bonner, 1889) James, William. “The Will to Believe.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Edited by Kelly James Clark, 233-240. Toronto: Broadview, 2008.  Latzer, Michael. “Leibniz's Conception of Metaphysical Evil.” Journal of the History of Ideas 55, no. 1, (1994): 1-15.  Mackie, J. L. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64, no. 254, (1955): 200-212.  Wilson, Edward O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books, 1999.  Papineau, David. “Naturalism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Ed-ward N. Zalta. Plantinga, Alvin. Naturalism vs. Evolution: A Religion/Science Conflict?. Internet Infi-dels, 2008. Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Phil-osophical Quarterly 16, no. 4 (1979): 335-341.  Russell, Paul and Kraal, Anders. "Hume on Religion." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Phi-losophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Sherry, Patrick. "Theodicy." Encyclopedia Britannica. Swinburne, Richard. “Natural Evil.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15, no. 4 (1978): 295-301.  Tooley, Michael. “The Problem of Evil.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Trakakis, Nick. “The Evidential Problem of Evil.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Yaran, Cafer Sadık. Kötülük ve Teodise. Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 1997.  Yasa, Metin. “Kötülük Sorunu.” In Din Felsefesi. Edited by Recep Kılıç and Mehmet Sait Reçber, 193-217. Ankara: Grafiker, 2018. 

Tw: arif_adalarIg: [email protected]

Merhaba, bu bölümde dinin kökeni üzerine bir değerlendirmede bulundum. Aşağıdaki eserleri kaynakça ve ileri okuma olarak değerlendirebilirsiniz. Anscombe, G. E. M. An Introduction to Wittgensteins Tractatus. New York: Harper, Row, 2. Basım, 1965. Batak, Kemal. Naturalizm Çıkmazı: Dennett’ten Dawkins’e Yeni Ateizmin Felsefi Temelleri ve Eleştirisi. İsntabul: İz Yayıncılık, 2011. Dennet, Daniel C. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Viking, 2006. Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Thought. çev. Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press, 1995. Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and The Profane: The Nature of Religion. çev. Williard R. Trask New York: Harcourt—Brace, 1959. Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity. çev. Marian Evans. London: Trübner—Ludgate Hill, 2. Basım, 1881. Freud, Sigmund. The Future of an Illusion. çev. James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton, 1961. Friedman, Jack—Shah, Timothy S. “Introduction”. Ed. Jack Friedman—Timothy Samuel Shah, Homo Religiosus? Exploring the Roots of Religion and Religious Freedom in Human Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Hume, David. Din Üstüne. çev. Mete Tunçay. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 6. Basım, 2019. McLellan, David. Marxism and Religion. London: The Macmillan Press, 1987. Plantinga, Alvin. “Theism, Naturalism, and Rationality” Ed. Jack Friedman—Timothy Samuel Shah, Homo Religiosus? Exploring the Roots of Religion and Religious Freedom in Human Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Topaloğlu, Aydın. Teizm ve Ateizm: Tanrıtanımazlığın Felsefi Boyutları. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2020. Toprak, Bilal. Din Arkeolojisinin İmkânı ve Göbekli Tepe. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2019. Youtube: A. Arif Adalar İletişim yolları;Tw: arif_adalarIg: arif.adalar [email protected]

Youtube: A. Arif Adalar İletişim yolları;Tw: arif_adalarIg: https: arif.adalar [email protected]

Youtube: A. Arif Adalarİletişim yolları;Tw: https://twitter.com/arif_adalarIg: https://www.instagram.com/arif.adalar/[email protected]

Youtube: A. Arif Adalar  İletişim yolları;  Tw: https://twitter.com/arif_adalar  Ig: https://www.instagram.com/arif.adalar/  [email protected]

Youtube: A. Arif Adalarİletişim yolları;Tw: https://twitter.com/arif_adalarIg: https://www.instagram.com/arif.adalar/[email protected]

Merhaba, bugün de temel argümanlardan biri olan kozmolojik argümanı değerlendirmeye çalıştım.İletişim yolları;Tw: https://twitter.com/arif_adalarIg: https://www.instagram.com/arif.adalar/[email protected]

Bu bölümde oldukça temel olan argümanlardan biri olan ontolojik argümanı değerlendirdik.  Youtube: A. Arif Adalar Tw: arif_adalar Ig: arif.adalar [email protected]